mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards

arXiv 2402.18571 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 145

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-grained control over large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge, hindering their adaptability to diverse user needs. While Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) shows promise in aligning LLMs, its reliance on scalar rewards often limits its ability to capture diverse user preferences in real-world applications. To address this limitation, we introduce the Directional Preference Alignment (DPA) framework. Unlike the scalar-reward RLHF, DPA incorporates multi-objective reward modeling to represent diverse preference profiles. Additionally, DPA models user preferences as directions (i.e., unit vectors) in the reward space to achieve user-dependent preference control. Our method involves training a multi-objective reward model and then fine-tuning the LLM with a preference-conditioned variant of Rejection Sampling Finetuning (RSF), an RLHF method adopted by Llama 2. This method enjoys a better performance trade-off across various reward objectives. In comparison with the scalar-reward RLHF, DPA offers users intuitive control over LLM generation: they can arithmetically specify their desired trade-offs (e.g., more helpfulness with less verbosity). We also validate the effectiveness of DPA with real-world alignment experiments on Mistral-7B. Our method provides straightforward arithmetic control over the trade-off between helpfulness and verbosity while maintaining competitive performance with strong baselines such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO).

Key facts. Cited by 145 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 53 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2024.

Builds on

53 of 82 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  2. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  3. 2023Verbosity Bias in Preference Labeling by Large Language Models16 Oct
  4. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
  6. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment1 Dec

Other references · 47

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  7. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  9. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  10. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  11. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  12. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
35 more
  1. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  4. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  5. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  6. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  7. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  8. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
  9. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  10. 2022Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Modelcited by 557
  11. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
  12. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
  13. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
  14. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 395
  15. 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 382
  16. 2023A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHFcited by 285
  17. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
  18. 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 256
  19. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 232
  20. 2023Nash Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 220
  21. 2022Optimizing Prompts for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 204
  22. 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
  23. 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
  24. 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 174
  25. 2024A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 141
  26. 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 140
  27. 2023SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHFcited by 107
  28. 2023Is RLHF More Difficult than Standard RL?cited by 96
  29. 2018Batch Active Preference-Based Learning of Reward Functionscited by 87
  30. 2021Pre-trained Language Models in Biomedical Domain: A Systematic Surveycited by 87
  31. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  32. 2023LMFlow: An Extensible Toolkit for Finetuning and Inference of Large Foundation Modelscited by 58
  33. 2023Revisiting Scalarization in Multi-Task Learning: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 51
  34. 2023Peering Through Preferences: Unraveling Feedback Acquisition for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 23
  35. 2023Moral Machine or Tyranny of the Majority?cited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 52; 2025: 58; 2026: 35.

145 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  2. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 431
  3. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
  4. 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
  5. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
  6. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 265
  7. 2024VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generationcited by 190
  8. 2024Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMscited by 142
  9. 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferencescited by 129
  10. 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFcited by 126
  11. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignmentcited by 105
  12. 2024Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHFcited by 105
38 more
  1. 2024Group Robust Preference Optimization in Reward-free RLHFcited by 94
  2. 2024Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectivescited by 90
  3. 2024Strengthening Multimodal Large Language Model with Bootstrapped Preference Optimizationcited by 75
  4. 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularizationcited by 72
  5. 2024PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Timecited by 58
  6. 2026Rethinking Rubric Generation for Improving LLM Judge and Reward Modeling for Open-ended Taskscited by 55
  7. 2024GenARM: Reward Guided Generation with Autoregressive Reward Model for Test-time Alignmentcited by 54
  8. 2024PAL: Pluralistic Alignment Framework for Learning from Heterogeneous Preferencescited by 53
  9. 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimizationcited by 53
  10. 2024From Lists to Emojis: How Format Bias Affects Model Alignmentcited by 48
  11. 2025Multi-Attribute Steering of Language Models via Targeted Interventioncited by 44
  12. 2024Conditional Language Policy: A General Framework for Steerable Multi-Objective Finetuningcited by 42
  13. 2024Personality Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 36
  14. 2025Navigate the Unknown: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Intrinsic Motivation Guided Explorationcited by 33
  15. 2024Weak-to-Strong Search: Align Large Language Models via Searching over Small Language Modelscited by 32
  16. 2024LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Docited by 32
  17. 2024Sharp Analysis for KL-Regularized Contextual Bandits and RLHFcited by 32
  18. 2024Provable Pluralistic Alignment: Multi-Party RLHF under Offline Human Feedbackcited by 31
  19. 2024FGAIF: Aligning Large Vision-Language Models with Fine-grained AI Feedbackcited by 30
  20. 2026Reward Hacking in the Era of Large Models: Mechanisms, Emergent Misalignment, Challengescited by 30
  21. 2024Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization: Balancing Safety-Helpfulness in Language Modelscited by 27
  22. 2025Trajectory Balance with Asynchrony: Decoupling Exploration and Learning for Fast, Scalable LLM Post-Trainingcited by 27
  23. 2025PARM: Multi-Objective Test-Time Alignment via Preference-Aware Autoregressive Reward Modelcited by 27
  24. 2024On the Limited Generalization Capability of the Implicit Reward Model Induced by Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 26
  25. 2024Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferencescited by 23
  26. 2025Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 22
  27. 2025Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPOcited by 21
  28. 2024MAP: Low-compute Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Fronts via Quadratic Approximationcited by 20
  29. 2024Inference-Time Language Model Alignment via Integrated Value Guidancecited by 19
  30. 2025Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferencescited by 19
  31. 2025Whose Boat Does it Float? Improving Personalization in Preference Tuning via Inferred User Personascited by 17
  32. 2024ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Modelscited by 16
  33. 2025Adaptive Batch-Wise Sample Scheduling for Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 16
  34. 2025Gradient-Based Multi-Objective Deep Learning: Algorithms, Theories, Applications, and Beyondcited by 15
  35. 2025Self-Improvement Towards Pareto Optimality: Mitigating Preference Conflicts in Multi-Objective Alignmentcited by 15
  36. 2025Speak Easy: Eliciting Harmful Jailbreaks from LLMs with Simple Interactionscited by 14
  37. 2024Traversing Pareto Optimal Policies: Provably Efficient Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  38. 2024T-REG: Preference Optimization with Token-Level Reward Regularizationcited by 13

50 most cited of 145 All 145 (JSON)

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Aligning Crowd Feedback via Distributional Preference Reward Modeling
  2. 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modeling
  3. 2026One Model for All: Multi-Objective Controllable Language Models
  4. 2026One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignment
  5. 2025UC-MOA: Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment for Distributional Pareto-Optimality
  6. 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models
  7. 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization
  8. 2025Reward-aware Preference Optimization: A Unified Mathematical Framework for Model Alignment