LLM preference optimization methods
Key facts. LLM preference optimization methods: 1,132 papers on arXiv since 2017 (data through 7 Oct 2026). 736 of its 1,132 mapped papers (65%) cite “Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback” (2022, arXiv 2203.02155). 359 of its 1,132 mapped papers (32%) cite “A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences” (2023, arXiv 2310.12036). 21 new papers 17 Sep–7 Oct.
What’s new
17 Sep – 7 Oct 2026
21 new papers, 17 Sep – 7 Oct; 3 this week.
- This week · 3
- Efficient Best-of-N policy evaluation for inference-time alignment
- CM-DPO: Constraint-Margin Direct Preference Optimization for LLM Planning also fits: Process reward models for reasoning
- LSC-DPO: Learning-Signal-Controlled Direct Preference Optimization
- Earlier · 18
- Which Preferences to Train On? End-to-End Multi-Objective Alignment with an Adversarial Preference Distribution
- Bidirectional Preference Synthesis: Learning Prompt-Conditioned Preferences from Boundary Failures
- The Asymptotics of Language Model Alignment with Memory
- GAW-PO: Preference Optimization with Gradient-Aligned Token Weights
- Multi-LLM Collaborative Alignment via Stackelberg Games also fits: Process reward models for reasoning
- Optimal Design for Active Preference Learning with Biased LLM Judges
- Uncertainty-Normalized Margins for Direct Preference Optimization also fits: Reward modeling and RLHF
All 21
- Generalizable Lifelong Model Editing via Preference Optimization
- Rethinking Personalized Generation: Test-Time Alignment via Factorized Ranking Models also fits: Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG
- BA-DPO: Bias-Adjusted Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
- Sample What You Say: Aligning Language Models to Sample the Distributions They State
- ABC-Align: Prediction-Powered Alignment with Adaptive Bias Control
- LLM Alignment--Utility Asymmetry under Semantic-Preserving Transformations also fits: Human values and AI feedback alignment
- The Alignment Paradox: How Post-Training Amplifies Confident Hallucinations in Language Models also fits: Human values and AI feedback alignment
- DimPO: Dimensionality Reduction for Attention using Preference Optimization also fits: Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG
- Masking Frequent Tokens Sharpens Direct Preference Optimization
- onPanda: Efficient Annotation of On-Policy Alignment Data for LLMs and Agents via Token-Level Correction also fits: Human values and AI feedback alignment
- ExpBoN: Exponential-Noise Best-of-n for Efficient Test-Time LLM Alignment also fits: Process reward models for reasoning
Foundations
Most cited by papers here
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback2022cited by 736 here
- A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences2023cited by 359 here
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward2024cited by 293 here
- ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model2024cited by 177 here
- Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation2024cited by 150 here
Lineage
The papers this direction builds on, oldest first.
Each paper on the line cites the one before.
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 410 here
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 273 here
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 375 here
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 113 here
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 736 here
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 460 here
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 151 here
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 152 here
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 111 here
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 103 here
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 293 here
13 more it builds on, not in this chain
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 99 here
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 194 here
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 123 here
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 133 here
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 174 here
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 804 here
- 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimizationcited by 131 here
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 98 here
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 359 here
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 96 here
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 150 here
- 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positivecited by 94 here
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 177 here
The 24 most cited of 1,274.
Browse
30 of 1,132, ranked 6–35
- 6Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization2023131
- 7Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions2022123
- 8A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment2021113
- 9Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization2024103
- 10Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive202494
- 11Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment202393
- 12Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study202491
- 13LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment202387
- 14Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback202485
- 15OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment202383
All 30
- 16Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment202382
- 17Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints202377
- 18Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignment202474
- 19From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function202474
- 20Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset202459
- 21Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards202459
- 22Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback202458
- 23Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment202456
- 24Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision202353
- 25Some things are more CRINGE than others: Iterative Preference Optimization with the Pairwise Cringe Loss202351
- 26KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization202449
- 27Token-level Direct Preference Optimization202448
- 28Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey202348
- 29LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rank202442
- 30Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization202342
- 31β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic β202441
- 32Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms202440
- 33Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment202438
- 34The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning202338
- 35What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning202336