mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignment

arXiv 2601.18731 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) aims to align outputs with human preferences, and personalized alignment further adapts models to individual users. This relies on personalized reward models that capture user-specific preferences and automatically provide individualized feedback. However, developing these models faces two critical challenges: the scarcity of feedback from individual users and the need for efficient adaptation to unseen users. We argue that addressing these constraints requires a paradigm shift from fitting data to learn user preferences to learn the process of preference adaptation. To realize this, we propose Meta Reward Modeling (MRM), which reformulates personalized reward modeling as a meta-learning problem. Specifically, we represent each user's reward model as a weighted combination of base reward functions, and optimize the initialization of these weights using a Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML)-style framework to support fast adaptation under limited feedback. To ensure robustness, we introduce the Robust Personalization Objective (RPO), which places greater emphasis on hard-to-learn users during meta optimization. Extensive experiments on personalized preference datasets validate that MRM enhances few-shot personalization, improves user robustness, and consistently outperforms baselines. We release code at https://github.com/ModalityDance/MRM.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 5 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

Builds on

5 of 8 references.

References · 5

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2019MeLU: Meta-Learned User Preference Estimator for Cold-Start Recommendationcited by 121
  4. 2024Multi-step Problem Solving Through a Verifier: An Empirical Analysis on Model-induced Process Supervisioncited by 52
  5. 2023Meta-Learning with Adaptive Weighted Loss for Imbalanced Cold-Start Recommendationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Personalized RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models with Human Aligned Personalization
  2. 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorization
  3. 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modeling
  4. 2024Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes
  5. 2025The Reward Model Selection Crisis in Personalized Alignment
  6. 2023On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment
  7. 2025Two Minds Better Than One: Collaborative Reward Modeling for LLM Alignment
  8. 2024Transforming and Combining Rewards for Aligning Large Language Models