SPA: Achieving Consensus in LLM Alignment via Self-Priority Optimization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
In high-stakes scenarios-such as self-harm, legal, or medical queries-LLMs must be both trustworthy and helpful. However, these goals often conflict. We propose priority alignment, a new alignment paradigm that enforces a strict "trustworthy-before-helpful" ordering: optimization of helpfulness is conditioned on first meeting trustworthy thresholds (e.g., harmlessness or honesty). To realize this, we introduce Self-Priority Alignment (SPA)-a fully unsupervised framework that generates diverse responses, self-evaluates them and refines them by the model itself, and applies dual-criterion denoising to remove inconsistency and control variance. From this, SPA constructs lexicographically ordered preference pairs and fine-tunes the model using an uncertainty-weighted alignment loss that emphasizes high-confidence, high-gap decisions. Experiments across multiple benchmarks show that SPA improves helpfulness without compromising safety, outperforming strong baselines while preserving general capabilities. Our results demonstrate that SPA provides a scalable and interpretable alignment strategy for critical LLM applications.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 35 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2025.
Builds on
35 of 48 references.
References · 35
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
23 more
- 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 496
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 463
- 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 368
- 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
- 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 263
- 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 261
- 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 175
- 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 148
- 2023LM-Infinite: Zero-Shot Extreme Length Generalization for Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2023Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Trainingcited by 122
- 2024Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectivescited by 94
- 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimizationcited by 54
- 2024MetaAligner: Towards Generalizable Multi-Objective Alignment of Language Modelscited by 44
- 2024TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weightscited by 42
- 2025SafeDPO: A Simple Approach to Direct Preference Optimization with Enhanced Safetycited by 37
- 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignmentcited by 27
- 2025SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without Hyperparameterscited by 25
- 2025Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPOcited by 22
- 2024Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models Through Hypervolume Maximizationcited by 20
- 2025Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignmentcited by 18
- 2025Fundamental Safety-Capability Trade-offs in Fine-tuning Large Language Modelscited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Aligning LLMs on a Budget: Inference-Time Alignment with Heuristic Reward Models
- 2024Aligning (Medical) LLMs for (Counterfactual) Fairness
- 2024Varying Shades of Wrong: Aligning LLMs with Wrong Answers Only
- 2024When to Trust LLMs: Aligning Confidence with Response Quality
- 2025ALIGN: Prompt-based Attribute Alignment for Reliable, Responsible, and Personalized LLM-based Decision-Making
- 2025On Evaluating LLM Alignment by Evaluating LLMs as Judges
- 2026Are Dilemmas and Conflicts in LLM Alignment Solvable? A View from Priority Graph
- 2025LLM Alignment as Retriever Optimization: An Information Retrieval Perspective