mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SPA: Achieving Consensus in LLM Alignment via Self-Priority Optimization

arXiv 2511.06222 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.CYcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

In high-stakes scenarios-such as self-harm, legal, or medical queries-LLMs must be both trustworthy and helpful. However, these goals often conflict. We propose priority alignment, a new alignment paradigm that enforces a strict "trustworthy-before-helpful" ordering: optimization of helpfulness is conditioned on first meeting trustworthy thresholds (e.g., harmlessness or honesty). To realize this, we introduce Self-Priority Alignment (SPA)-a fully unsupervised framework that generates diverse responses, self-evaluates them and refines them by the model itself, and applies dual-criterion denoising to remove inconsistency and control variance. From this, SPA constructs lexicographically ordered preference pairs and fine-tunes the model using an uncertainty-weighted alignment loss that emphasizes high-confidence, high-gap decisions. Experiments across multiple benchmarks show that SPA improves helpfulness without compromising safety, outperforming strong baselines while preserving general capabilities. Our results demonstrate that SPA provides a scalable and interpretable alignment strategy for critical LLM applications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 35 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2025.

Builds on

35 of 48 references.

References · 35

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  7. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  8. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
  9. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  10. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
  11. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
  12. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
23 more
  1. 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 496
  2. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 463
  3. 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 368
  4. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  5. 2023AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 263
  6. 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 261
  7. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
  8. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
  9. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 175
  10. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 148
  11. 2023LM-Infinite: Zero-Shot Extreme Length Generalization for Large Language Modelscited by 124
  12. 2023Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Trainingcited by 122
  13. 2024Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectivescited by 94
  14. 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimizationcited by 54
  15. 2024MetaAligner: Towards Generalizable Multi-Objective Alignment of Language Modelscited by 44
  16. 2024TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weightscited by 42
  17. 2025SafeDPO: A Simple Approach to Direct Preference Optimization with Enhanced Safetycited by 37
  18. 2024Spread Preference Annotation: Direct Preference Judgment for Efficient LLM Alignmentcited by 27
  19. 2025SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without Hyperparameterscited by 25
  20. 2025Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPOcited by 22
  21. 2024Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models Through Hypervolume Maximizationcited by 20
  22. 2025Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignmentcited by 18
  23. 2025Fundamental Safety-Capability Trade-offs in Fine-tuning Large Language Modelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Aligning LLMs on a Budget: Inference-Time Alignment with Heuristic Reward Models
  2. 2024Aligning (Medical) LLMs for (Counterfactual) Fairness
  3. 2024Varying Shades of Wrong: Aligning LLMs with Wrong Answers Only
  4. 2024When to Trust LLMs: Aligning Confidence with Response Quality
  5. 2025ALIGN: Prompt-based Attribute Alignment for Reliable, Responsible, and Personalized LLM-based Decision-Making
  6. 2025On Evaluating LLM Alignment by Evaluating LLMs as Judges
  7. 2026Are Dilemmas and Conflicts in LLM Alignment Solvable? A View from Priority Graph
  8. 2025LLM Alignment as Retriever Optimization: An Information Retrieval Perspective