Collegiate cross country teams often build their season schedules on intuition rather than evidence, partly because large-scale performance datasets were not publicly accessible prior to the National Running Club Database (NRCD). We analyze the comprehensive-era Cross Country subset of NRCD, 23,360 results from 7,056 athletes (2023-2025; >99% course/weather coverage). Under leakage control and temporal validation, race-result features do not support out-of-year forecasting of individual improvement (best men's R^2 = 0.044; women's -0.018), capturing only a small fraction of the outcome's reliability ceiling (approximately 0.23-0.28). Against this null, team race frequency associates with nationals placement (pooled RR = 2.09; GEE OR = 2.56/SD). Program-wide opportunity (roster depth; Effective Racing Opportunity) outranks a single workhorse's max race count cross-sectionally, but overall team depth for race count is controlled. Converted Only times (not adjusted for weather and elevation) overstate mean first-to-last gains by 15-21 s relative to Standardized. These results challenge coaching practices that treat schedule design as purely anecdotal and show how NRCD enables evidence-based decision-making in collegiate cross country.

Deep neural networks often exploit spurious associations, a failure known as shortcut learning. Before deployment, models should be audited for reliance on a set of concepts, such as acquisition artifacts or demographics. Current methods, such as linear probes and concept activation vectors, measure reliance by asking whether each concept, in isolation, is decodable from a layer. Their scores therefore reflect not only reliance but also correlations in the audit dataset. We introduce Independent Canonical cONcept (ICON) decomposition, which quantifies the share of a layer's variance each concept explains, conditional on all other concepts and the outcome. ICON scores are variance shares, comparable across layers and between continuous and categorical concepts. ICON also reports the share the set leaves unexplained. On simulated data, ICON recovers the true importance more accurately than seven baselines. On skin-cancer and neuroimaging models, ICON distinguishes learned shortcuts from correlated concepts, confirmed by retraining and out-of-distribution tests.

An agentic society is a collection of AI agents that coordinate autonomously across trust boundaries, on behalf of different principals whose objectives may only partially align. We show experimentally that in agentic societies even honest, competent agents often fail to reach satisfactory outcomes with existing harnesses and messaging primitives, and that faulty or malicious agents can stall collaboration, influence outcomes, and pursue other harmful goals by exploiting vulnerabilities in communication (“speech”). We argue that agentic societies need a social harness for inter-agent interactions, in addition to each agent's personal harness, which manages its private context and communication with its principal. We propose a layered architecture for social harnesses which (i) prevents classes of failures outright, (ii) enables agents to detect invalid messages at runtime, and (iii) supports post-facto investigation and consequences, and highlight directions for future research to realize these capabilities.

The same underlying computational problem is solved across unrelated fields under different names: recursive Bayesian state estimation appears as a "Kalman filter" in control, "Bayesian forecasting" in pharmacokinetics, and "data assimilation" in geoscience. Topical and citation-based scientific embeddings cannot see this shared problem. We distill each paper once into a domain- and method-name-stripped faceted computational fingerprint, a free-text mechanism skeleton plus controlled computational facets. We define a tunable, facet-selectable similarity over it. The goal is solution import: surface cross-field pairs solving the same problem, so a bespoke implementation can be swapped for another field's standard, specialized solver. On a benchmark of 18 method families across 109 papers, the skeleton lifts cross-domain retrieval average precision over the abstract from 0.222 to 0.513, and the whole fingerprint reaches 0.557. Strikingly, four trained scientific embedders all fall below plain abstract+TF-IDF: they encode topical and citation similarity, the wrong signal for this task. The gain is the representation: the abstract-to-skeleton swap lifts every embedder, and the pipeline is one cached LLM call per paper plus a cheap embedder. An interventional re-skin / math-edit test shows the fingerprint tracks the computation, not the field. On a 501-paper wild corpus, known twins dominate the top of the ranking (23 of the top 30); with planted pairs excluded from the results, three blind LLM judges rate 3 of the top 5 and 8 of the top 30 pairs genuine import candidates, and 0 of 30 random ones. The human verification is the four executed imports: in one, an open standard solver reproduces a bespoke clinical dosing engine's output. We release the benchmark, the code, and the distillation prompt.

World-action models (WAMs) jointly model future observations and actions, typically predicting the future as RGB images. Other visual modalities such as depth, pretrained visual features, and point tracks can more efficiently capture geometric, semantic, and motion features. However, how best to combine these modalities within WAMs remains an open question. We introduce ModAR, the first WAM to autoregressively denoise multiple future modalities before predicting actions. This allows each prediction to condition on previously generated modalities. We train from scratch to systematically study how training-data mixtures, predicted modalities, and WAM formulations affect performance. In our evaluations, WAMs benefit from predicting point tracks, DINO features, and depth maps, while additionally predicting future RGB does not provide a consistent benefit. We also find that ModAR's sequential generation outperforms existing WAM formulations, with the highest average success rate at all evaluated data scales. We also fine-tune the video-model-initialized WAM Flex-π on the same data; ModAR achieves a slightly higher observed average success rate (75

We introduce and release ScienceBuddy, an interactive scientific research workspace that brings continually improving scientific agents into researchers' everyday workflows. ScienceBuddy supports researchers in carrying out scientific tasks while transforming their requests, feedback, and execution evidence into tasks and evaluation rubrics for continual learning. At its core is recursive-in-recursive self-improvement, a paradigm that couples harness evolution with model reinforcement learning: the inner recursion improves the harness with the model fixed, while the outer recursion trains the model under the improved harness. Harness evolution shapes training experience, and model learning creates new opportunities for harness adaptation. We present case studies of researcher interaction, harness refinement, and model learning, with the benchmark cases spanning four scientific task families. By releasing ScienceBuddy as a research product, we make this paradigm available to the scientific community and take a step toward discovery intelligence: scientific AI that advances through sustained collaboration with researchers and evolves alongside the research it supports. Website: http://science-buddy.io

Interactive control for video generation is moving from coarse prompts toward fine-grained, physically meaningful manipulation of dynamic scenes. Yet existing controllable methods either require the full control schedule before generation starts, or use pixel-space signals that dictate object positions rather than physical dynamics. To address these limitations, we propose PhysStream, an autoregressive model for physics-grounded image-to-video synthesis that incorporates structured scene memory---positional maps and object tracking maps derived online from previously generated frames---and supports fine-grained motion control via sparse velocity-increment signals that encode physical quantities, letting the model learn the underlying dynamics. We train our model in two stages: a bidirectional model is first finetuned with motion-control conditioning, then a causal autoregressive model is trained with additional structured scene memory, further improving physical consistency. PhysStream enables interactive, mid-generation control over multi-object tabletop rigid-body scenes---a capability not supported by prior methods---reducing motion distribution distance (FVMD) by 33% and trajectory error by 12% over the strongest baselines on synthetic benchmarks, and is preferred by human evaluators in over 85% of in-the-wild comparisons. Please check our website for more details: https://czzzzh.github.io/PhysStream

Large language models can produce fluent answers when their factual support is weak. This paper introduces Chain-of-Self-Questioning (CoSQ), a prompt-only framework that makes answer commitment conditional on an explicit assessment of the information required to answer a question. We evaluate three CoSQ variants under seventeen conditions on the 817-item TruthfulQA multiple-choice validation set using eleven open-weight and hosted model families. In the final balanced-option protocol, Grounded-CoSQ at τ=0.90 reduces the mean unconditional wrong-commitment rate from 13.1% under chain-of-thought prompting to 8.9%, a 32.1% relative reduction, while increasing answered accuracy from 86.9% to 89.7% and answering 87.6% of questions. Both improvements hold for all eleven models and at every evaluated threshold. Critical-CoSQ and Adaptive-CoSQ provide neighboring operating points with 88.6% and 86.5% coverage, respectively, while remaining more reliable than the baseline. A secondary Natural Questions Short-Answer evaluation provides convergent open-form evidence. These findings show that self-assessment can support explicit, tunable answer-or-abstain decisions when an unsupported commitment is more costly than referral or review.

Pruning can reduce the deployment cost of large language models (LLMs), but its impact on context-grounded tool calling remains poorly understood. We systematically study pruning-induced degradation in smart-home tool calling across four LLMs spanning dense Transformer, dense hybrid, and mixture-of-experts (MoE) architectures, together with depth, width, hybrid, and expert pruning methods. After post-pruning supervised fine-tuning (SFT), we evaluate more than 19,500 instances from three smart-home datasets. Beyond aggregate task accuracy, we characterize degradation along two dimensions: action components (i.e., operation, device, argument, and value) and task complexity. Our results show that dense models have narrow safe pruning regions followed by sharp degradation, while MoE models tolerate substantially more pruning. Pruning degrades grounded specificity before schema-level intent, and aggressive dense pruning can induce systematic over-refusal. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating pruning beyond aggregate accuracy when selecting pruned LLMs for reliable tool execution.

Neural audio codecs are a key component in speech language modeling. However, their high frame rates lead to long sequence lengths, increasing computational costs. Dynamic frame rate codecs mitigate this by reducing the effective frame rate using a compression step to merge multiple frames together. However, most prior methods either operate on single-codebook codecs or apply a single compression step before multi-layer quantization. This forces all quantization layers to share the same segmentation boundaries, despite the residual embeddings at different quantization layers exhibiting different rates of change over time. We propose LACE (Layer-Adaptive Codec Encoding), a dynamic frame rate codec that applies an independent compression step at each quantization layer, enabling layer-specific segmentation boundaries. To use LACE tokens in downstream text-to-speech (TTS), we further introduce union alignment and boundary anchor mechanisms to make durations consistent across layers while preserving compression benefits. Experiments on LibriTTS show that LACE offers a better rate-quality tradeoff than prior dynamic frame rate methods on the reconstruction task and improves TTS inference efficiency while maintaining competitive synthesis quality. Our code is released as part of the ESPnet3 codec recipe.

Interaction paradigms used in robot-assisted autism intervention have historically employed robots as teachers, clinical assistants, or more-abled peers to promote a variety of social skills. These modalities often leverage the expertise of trained practitioners to ensure that child-robot interactions are productive or clinically grounded to yield positive therapeutic benefits for children across the autism spectrum. Yet, despite the fact that the majority of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) attend mainstream schools and spend 80% or more of their time in the general classroom [27], there is a paucity of research incorporating validated classroom teaching pedagogies into robot-assisted autism interventions. In this work, we introduce a novel teaching methodology for advancing social skills in school-aged children with ASD. We evaluate the effectiveness of a novel robot-assisted autism intervention which incorporates the learning-by-teaching pedagogy and explores the comparative benefits of employing a robot versus a human confederate for improved performance on a set of social skills tasks. Results show that 80% of study participants performed better in the robot condition (mean performance in the robot condition=63%, mean performance in the confederate condition=37%), irrespective of the scenario order. Further, 90% of all participants were significantly more engaged in the robot condition (mean engagement: robot=61%, confederate=32%) and, while the effect did not result in the confederate condition, analyses indicate that overall engagement in the robot condition contributed to improved performance. These results suggest that robots employed in a learning-by-teaching context may help enhance engagement and improve performance on a simple social skills task for children with ASD.

Mobile manipulators deployed across many rooms and visits should improve with experience: after discovering that a cabinet is locked or finding an object in a drawer, the robot should reuse that knowledge rather than start each task from scratch. Yet today's robots often treat each task as new: compact scene representations omit interaction-derived knowledge, raw video histories are difficult to query, and VLM planners reason at inference time without persistently updating what the robot knows. We present MessyMem, a persistent memory system that enables mobile manipulators to learn from experience and reuse that knowledge across future tasks. It maintains a spatially grounded 3D scene graph of objects and locations, augments it with properties and outcomes learned through interaction, and links visual observations for fine-grained recall. We evaluate MessyMem in simulation and on a real mobile manipulator. In a continuous 25-task simulation spanning over 3 hours, MessyMem achieves 80.0% task progress, outperforming the strongest ablation by 14.8 percentage points and the strongest external baseline by 28.9 points, while retrieving task-relevant evidence from thousands of stored keyframes and over an hour into the past.

Uncertainty estimation for Vision-Language-Navigation (VLN) models is a critical task since it can help identify ambiguous and unreliable predictions, enabling agents to make safer navigation decisions. As one of the most advanced uncertainty estimation frameworks, conformal prediction (CP) offers a promising approach for uncertainty estimation in VLN. However, given that VLN agent requires a sequence of steps, standard calibration in conformal prediction fails to provide coverage guarantee it promises over a dependent, variable-length VLN episode. To this end, we propose Episode-Normalized Conformal Prediction (ENCP), which rescales a nonconformity score by the policy's residual confidence and calibrates one maximum score per episode. Under exchangeable calibration and test episodes, this construction covers the ground truth at every step with probability at least 1 - α, while allowing dependence among steps within an episode. Across four VLN policies and three nonconformity scores on R2R and REVERIE dataset, ENCP meets all reported empirical step-coverage targets on the seen-to-unseen evaluation. These results demonstrate that ENCP can provide model-agnostic uncertainty estimates, which might be useful for determining when a VLN agent should defer to a more capable predictor, including human assistance.

Language-model agents are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) during tool use: adversarial instructions hidden in untrusted tool outputs can covertly redirect legitimate task execution. Existing work often trains and evaluates defenses against fixed attacks that do not adapt to the defender's behavior, so the resulting defenses may struggle against adaptive attacks. We combine adaptive attacker-defender co-training with subsequent refinement: continued interaction improves both roles, while learned attackers provide training challenges for further gains in defender safety and task utility. We therefore model adaptive IPI as a general-sum Markov game: the defender advances the task through successive tool calls, while the attacker can inject multiple times within the same task and adapt subsequent attacks to the defender's responses. Building on this formulation, we propose CoER, a verifier-grounded co-evolution and refinement framework. After initializing the attacker from successful trajectories, Co-PPO retains historical policies from both roles as opponent populations and mixes current and historical opponents for bilateral reinforcement learning, extending training beyond the latest matchup. Attackers from these populations are then reused to challenge teacher agents, and only demonstrations verified for both safety and task completion are used to fine-tune the co-evolved defender. In our main seven-domain evaluation, CoER reduces observed overall attack success from 38.5% to 0.2% and raises task utility from 63.2% to 76.3%, with improved attack resistance on external benchmarks.

LLM assistants are widely used for daily social advice, yet evaluating their social reasoning in such consultation settings remains challenging since (i) it requires setups where the assistant learns about social situations from subjective user narratives, and (ii) social properties, such as others' intentions, typically lack verifiable ground truth. To address these challenges, we introduce Fuse, a multi-agent simulation framework for studying user-mediated social reasoning. In Fuse, a target agent with a hidden motive interacts with other agents including one representing the user, who then consults the evaluated assistant to infer the target's motive, providing verifiable ground truth by construction. Simulation faithfulness is validated through a human study with 24k annotations. We apply Fuse to 12 LLMs and demonstrate its analytical utility by systematically isolating key factors, showing that (i) user mediation compounds the inherent difficulty of social reasoning; (ii) LLMs exhibit systematic sensitivity to biased user framing; (iii) models can require more details than humans need to reach a correct prediction; and (iv) longer conversations do not always improve performance despite providing opportunities for clarifying questions. We open-source Fuse and a dataset with 21k examples.

Differences in vehicle kinematic characteristics between production autonomous vehicles (PAVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) have been limitedly investigated by empirical studies. Most recent studies rely on simulation-based models, while some further investigate low-level adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems in controlled experiments. These methods commonly adapt some time-domain metrics to characterize PAV-HV differences across limited driving conditions. However, current PAVs equipped with high-level autonomous driving systems generate driving behaviors in a black box using data-driven models. These fundamentally different mechanisms for generating behaviors may produce distinct kinematic characteristics in traffic. More importantly, these time-domain metrics cannot reflect frequency-related traffic dynamics across different driving scenarios. Thus, this study adapted a real-world PAV dataset with four PAV platforms and developed a frequency-domain framework to quantify kinematic differences between PAVs and HVs across diverse driving scenarios, including varying driving states, lighting, weather, and vehicle densities. The framework transforms kinematic signals into the frequency domain and extracts spectral features, and then compares these features between PAVs and HVs based on kernel density estimation and Wasserstein distance. The results reveal clear scenario-dependent PAV-HV spectral differences. Specifically, speed-related differences were consistently smaller during car-following than cruising, while rainy conditions consistently enlarged acceleration-related differences compared with clear conditions. These findings highlight the necessity of multi-scenario evaluations and demonstrate the value of frequency-domain analysis for characterizing PAV-HV kinematic differences under real-world conditions.

Unauthorized hardware replacement can preserve a wireless device's logical identity while altering its physical implementation, posing a challenge to hardware integrity verification. Spatio-frequency polarization fingerprints (SFPFs) capture device-dependent responses across multiple frequencies and directions, but their frequency and spatial dimensions exhibit different structural dependencies. We propose FreqSpaNet, an SFPF representation learning network for open set hardware anomaly detection. A frequency branch captures local variations among neighboring frequencies, while a geometry-aware spatial branch models directional relationships using angular information. The two representations are combined through adaptive fusion, and complementary pretraining further captures shared information while preserving the distinct characteristics of the frequency and spatial representations. Experiments show that FreqSpaNet achieves a mean AUROC of 96.31\%, 9.05 points above the baseline. Results under seven hardware replacement scenarios further verify the effectiveness of FreqSpaNet.

We introduce LimiX-2, a new model in the LimiX family, developed through model and data scaling guided by our previously established scaling laws. LimiX-2 adopts the Contextual Mechanism Networks (CMNs) paradigm and is pretrained with Context-Conditional Masked Modeling (CCMM). CMNs shifts the organizing principle of in-context learning from target-centric prediction to mechanism-oriented joint modeling. Rather than centering the network on the p(y | x, D_context) objective of conventional tabular PFNs, it is designed around learning p(x, y | D_context), a context-dependent representation of the joint structure underlying data generation. Pretraining uses synthetic datasets generated by structural causal models (SCMs) spanning diverse graph structures, functional mechanisms, and observation processes. Evaluations on TabArena, TALENT, and BCCO show that LimiX-2 outperforms current dataset-specific models and tabular foundation models. Beyond predictive performance, the CMN paradigm also promotes causal awareness in LimiX-2: its feature attention encodes direct causal relationships, enabling accurate causal skeleton recovery.

A linear sketch is a randomized linear mapping of a vector v to a lower dimensional sketch vector, designed to preserve relevant information about v. We consider sketches of vectors v ∈ Z^u (for u ∈ N), designed for exact recovery of v from its sketch. Concretely, our Stuffed IBLT is a linear sketch configured with a capacity n ∈ N and a multiplicity limit L ∈ N and will recover v with high probability whenever ||v||_0 ≤ n and ||v||_∞≤ L. The sketch can be maintained efficiently under unrestricted updates to v, i.e., v is not subject to any constraints in between decoding requests. This makes the sketch useful for streaming algorithms and for solving the (multi)set reconciliation problem. For any positive constants c, ε, and for large enough n and u ≥ n^1+Ω(1), the space usage of a Stuffed IBLT is within a factor 1+ε from the information-theoretic optimum while allowing updates in constant time, and decoding in time O(n) with failure probability n^-c. This improves the space/time/error probability trade-off over all prior constructions with similar functionality, including the Invertible Bloom Lookup Table (IBLT). The performance of the Stuffed IBLT is essentially the best we could hope for, up to the dependence on c and ε. We make the dependence on these parameters explicit, and further show a lower bound demonstrating that the dependence on c is optimal within the class of peeling-based approaches. Our improvement comes from a careful combination of Walzer's spatial coupling technique (SODA '21), the purity heuristic of Houen, Pagh, and Walzer (SOSA '23), and backyarding (Belazzougui, Kucherov, and Walzer, ESA '24; Fleischhacker, Green Larsen, Obremski, and Simkin, ICALP '24), allowing us to eliminate bottlenecks of past approaches.

Modeling student misconceptions in a realistic manner is critical for AI in education. In this work, we examine how large language models (LLMs) reason about misconceptions when generating distractor answers for multiple-choice questions (MCQs), a task that requires producing answers that are incorrect, yet plausible. We introduce a taxonomy over reasoning strategies for distractor generation that is grounded in learning-science literature and empirical observation, which we apply to LLM-generated reasoning traces across math and science MCQs. On the math dataset, we find that models follow a misconception-based process with potentially high diagnostic value: they recover the correct solution, articulate student errors, simulate them, and select plausible candidates. On the science dataset, on the other hand, they tend to follow a less robust approach based on semantic similarity to the correct answer. We find the most frequent failure modes to be that the model is unable to generate a correct solution or that it discards plausible distractor candidates when performing selection. Providing the correct solution in the prompt yields a relative improvement of 6.4% in alignment with human-authored distractors, highlighting the critical role of anchoring distractor generation to the correct solution. Together, our findings offer an interpretable view of how LLMs model incorrect student reasoning.

This study asks whether training-time motion-prior regularization can improve insertion success when a diffusion policy is learned from only 15 demonstrations. Minimum jerk discourages abrupt changes in predicted translational acceleration; speed-curvature regularization instead couples movement speed to path geometry. These are candidate mechanisms for task completion, not safety guarantees. We compare the priors individually and jointly, neither prior, and generic smoothness, with 80 real-robot trials per setting pooled over four recorded condition classes. Joint and minimum-jerk-only settings each achieved 70/80 successes (87.5%), versus 69/80 (86.3%) for speed-curvature only, 66/80 (82.5%) for neither prior, and 67/80 (83.8%) for generic smoothness. Success rates and Wilson 95% confidence intervals are visualized for direct comparison. Joint regularization exceeded neither by 5.0 percentage points but provided no observed gain over minimum jerk alone. The results motivate minimum jerk as the simpler candidate for replication, without establishing synergy, biomechanical specificity, improved safety, or distribution-shift robustness.

Modern large-scale machine learning tasks often require multiple workers, devices, CPUs, or GPUs to compute stochastic gradients in parallel and asynchronously to train model weights. Theoretical results typically distinguish between two settings: (i) the homogeneous setting, where all workers have access to the same data distribution, and (ii) the heterogeneous setting, where each worker operates on different data distributions. Known optimal time complexities in these settings reveal a significant gap, with far more pessimistic guarantees in the heterogeneous case. In this work, we investigate whether these pessimistic optimal time complexities can be overcome under different assumptions. Surprisingly, we show that improvement is provably impossible under widely used first- and second-order similarity assumptions for any randomized algorithm. We then turn to the interpolation regime and demonstrate that the weak interpolation assumption alone is also insufficient. Finally, we introduce a minimal combination of irreducible assumptions, strong interpolation and the local Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition, to derive a new time complexity bound that matches the dependence on worker computation times in the best-known result in the homogeneous setting, without requiring identical data distributions.

Near-surface weather varies over tens to hundreds of meters, yet remains unresolved in analyses and forecasts. We test whether this variation can be inferred without resolving atmospheric dynamics. Combining sparse weather stations, high-resolution Earth observation, and coarse atmospheric dynamics, we infer temperature, dewpoint, and wind at 30-m resolution across the contiguous United States. Against measurements held out in space and time, estimates reduce error by 11-28% relative to the strongest baseline. Within held-out 0.25^∘ grid cells, we recover more spatial variance than baselines, explaining nearly half of temperature variability in the median cell. The method captures time-varying differences between locations and produces coherent patterns associated with topography and land cover. Beyond weather, our findings illustrate how sparse observations of a dynamical system can be combined with dense observations of persistent environmental structure to recover otherwise unresolved spatial variability.

Despite the rapid uptake of black-box object detectors in marine mammal research and monitoring, explainability techniques are rarely integrated into conservation workflows. Furthermore, most classification-oriented explainability tools are ill-suited to detection tasks involving imagery of social organisms or those with colonial life histories, as they ignore multiple detections within a scene and produce single-instance outputs that blur evidence across individuals. These methods also generate low-resolution, often biologically irrelevant visuals, limiting their utility for debugging, targeted data augmentation, and refined data collection. We proposed Det-LIME, a detector-aware, multi-instance adaptation of Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) that produced instance-specific, box-aligned explanations by combining per-detection weighting, a proximity kernel that emphasizes regions near each box, and Intersection-over-Union-based matching to track the same instance across perturbations. We evaluated Det-LIME on aerial drone imagery for harbor seal detection, with an additional seabird case study to assess generality, and compared it with vanilla LIME, Stabilized LIME, Deterministic LIME, and gradient-based attribution methods. Using the Attribution Ratio and Max Saliency Hit Rate metrics, we showed that Det-LIME consistently improved multi-instance attribution. In practice, these higher-resolution, instance-aware explanations provide insight into model outputs and support post-processing, debugging, and actionable improvements in modeling and data collection or augmentation.

The absolute capacity of dense associative memory has mainly been analyzed for unbiased patterns. Here we examine the effect of bias in centered binary patterns under the Krotov-Hopfield single-site criterion P_error=1/N, where P_error is the probability that a single-site flip lowers the energy of a stored pattern and N is the number of neurons. Each pattern component takes 1-q with probability q and -q otherwise, where 0<q≤1/2. For polynomial interactions of order n, a signal-to-noise analysis gives an absolute capacity of order N^n-1/ln N at q=1/2. For fixed q<1/2, however, the capacity is O(N^n/2) for even n≥4 and O(N^(n+1)/2) for odd n≥5. For n=3, both the unbiased and fixed-bias capacities remain O(N^2/ln N). For n≥4, these different asymptotic forms imply a nonuniform large-N limit near q=1/2. Asymptotic matching predicts a bias-induced crossover in the region 1-2q=O(ln N/N^⌊ n/2⌋-1). The crossover originates from a bias-dependent crosstalk mean that reduces the stability of sites carrying the more frequent value -q. Computer simulations are compared with the finite-size conditioned-Gaussian predictions. An activity-dependent control potential that cancels the conditional crosstalk mean restores the N^n-1/ln N capacity for fixed 0<q<1/2 within the conditioned-Gaussian approximation.

Capable open-weight models make local coding and reasoning attractive, but their context and execution state strain laptop memory. We present JustFit, an MLX-based inference runtime that combines KVExec for compressed KV execution, PhaseSwap for component residency, and StateTrans for state-preserving serving transitions. These mechanisms fuse reconstruction and coordinate just-in-time materialization and release, independently of model-weight quantization. In full-execution capacity tests on a 24 GiB M4 Pro MacBook running Qwen3.8-27B MXFP4, three independent runs complete 196,608 input and 16,384 output tokens, increasing completed single-request context from the mlx-vlm baseline's 30,720 positions to 212,992 (6.93x); a separate two-request run retains 229,376 positions in aggregate. In separate performance tests, a 32K-input, 64-output probe reaches 19.11 tokens/s, and a repeated 32K+6K workload has a median peak process footprint of 16,374 MiB. The integrated runtime answers 29 of 30 AIME 2026 problems correctly, showing how compact state and lifetime-aware execution expand local serving capacity while supporting extended generated reasoning.

Large language model (LLM) distillation aims to transfer the capabilities of a powerful teacher to a smaller student. Direct imitation, however, can also transfer the teacher's systematic bias and errors. This challenge is particularly pronounced under covariate shift, when the teacher's reliability on target questions is uncertain and target-domain reward feedback is unavailable. We propose Coupled Calibration and Learning (CCL), an LLM distillation algorithm that couples teacher calibration with student updates through token-level branching, using reward feedback only on source questions. Each iteration calibrates the teacher using source feedback and then uses the calibrated teacher to train the student on target questions. The updated student, in turn, informs subsequent calibration. In an autoregressive policy framework, we prove that the output student's expected average Kullback-Leibler divergence to the oracle student converges to zero at a polynomial rate in the number of iterations. The oracle maximizes the true reference-regularized target reward within the student class, which need not represent the unrestricted optimal policy. Our analysis quantifies the progress of projected student gradient updates while controlling the error in teacher calibration. We further establish a separation from regularized direct matching: its error relative to the oracle student can remain bounded away from zero even when the teacher achieves higher regularized target reward than every student policy. These results demonstrate that LLM distillation can overcome persistent teacher bias and recover the optimal student through coupled calibration and learning, without target-domain reward feedback.

Post-training a code generator against a learned judge can optimize proxy features that raise the score without improving the artifact. We study the opposite signal: a deterministic, judge-free filter that asks only whether a generated project launches cleanly under a headless engine (strict-launch). Under this gate, rejection-sampling self-distillation compounds out-of-family generalization: on GameCraft-Bench a 14B model raises the per-candidate clean-launch rate on four held-out families from 8.8% to 42.2% and coverage at 32 candidates from 84% to 100%, the gold references' own ceiling, beating the supervised model on every one of the 25 held-out tasks. The gate costs one engine invocation per candidate: no reward model, no judge. At a fixed admitted count, what governs the loop is verifier precision. Swapping in a lenient build check alone erases the gain (p=0.0012); a matched gold-duplication control regresses below the supervised model. Under a semantic gate on APPS, dialing fuel precision from 1.0 to 0.25 at fixed candidate count prices that fuel linearly: over 23 training seeds, half-clean fuel returns +3.59 percentage points against the +3.69 a linear rate predicts. Under count-matched rejection-SFT only one direction of verifier error carries a measurable cost. Search obeys the same gate: quadrupling the harvest budget is worth +1.62pp behind a strict gate and nothing distinguishable from zero behind a partial-credit one. Recall is nearly free; search pays only through a precise gate: the verifier is the curriculum.

Multi-agent systems split a task across a tree of agents and justify the split with folklore: smaller contexts, cleaner separation, parallelism. We ask what the split does to how much of what the leaves discover reaches the root. Model a decomposition as a tree in which an agent handed b items keeps any one with probability r(b). If r(b)=1/b, every tree delivers exactly one finding, for every task size and every shape; we verify this to 2.4 × 10^-15 on 20,000 random irregular trees. If r(b)=Cb^-δ, a depth-k tree over N findings yields C^k N^1-δ: task size and architecture separate, and architecture contributes only C ≤ 1 per level, so flat is optimal for yield and no arrangement of agents escapes the exponent δ. On 600 production deep-research traces δ= 0.34 [0.30, 0.38], by three identifications that do not share a failure mode. At a hop where item boundaries come from the tool rather than a text heuristic, and where b=1 occurs 550 times, C = 0.571 [0.527, 0.615] is observed rather than extrapolated, over 16,082 hops. A tier also costs alignment: on 1,012 annotated multi-agent traces one brief in sixteen goes off-target, giving μ= 0.939 and a per-tier penalty Cμ= 0.536. Depth is bought on two other axes. The root context is the only state that persists and the only one that cannot cheaply forget, and depth cuts its exposure from N items to N^1/k. Depth is also cheaper: production flat agents bill as N^1.39, not the N^2 an append-only context predicts, and at equal spend two tiers overtake flat at 403 findings. Across every parameter we measured the model says 0.7

Robot swarms, by virtue of their decentralised architecture, are a natural tool for scalable, robust modelling of spatial fields, such as water temperature, wind velocity, or terrain elevation. However, existing methods rely on external positioning systems that allow each robot to determine its own position in space. Here, we introduce location-unaware Gaussian process regression (LU-GPR) as a solution to the modelling of spatial fields in the absence of such positioning systems. LU-GPR allows each robot to infer the posterior mean and variance of the field in space, while simultaneously agreeing on a common frame of reference with its peers, using only local sensing and communication. We propose an online algorithm that allows each robot to consistently infer local estimates as its local frame of reference converges to the common one. By means of a product of experts model, each robot also combines the estimates of its peers with its own to obtain a global model. Our results show that LU-GPR scales well with the number of robots and is robust to limited communication ranges. We also demonstrate how it can be used in real-world monitoring scenarios to estimate the flow of an evacuating crowd.

Dominant programming paradigms inherit an execution model optimised for a bygone era of a single human mind instructing a local machine, leaving contemporary systems burdened with path dependencies. When forced to host multi-dimensional, connectionist intelligence, this brittle assembly model fractures under the weight of a profound probabilistic-symbolic impedance mismatch. While contemporary Software 3.x frameworks attempt to patch the mismatch by encasing large language models (LLMs) in increasingly complicated external harnesses, this spiralling architectural complexity only compounds the carrying cost of static code assembly. To address the cause rather than the effects, this paper introduces Software 4.0 -- an autopoietic heterarchy of human intelligence, neural AI, and natively reflective symbolic substrate. At its core is a simple premise: intelligence survives its ignorance by giving the unknown a form it can keep, and act upon without understanding. Under this paradigm, software is transformed from an inert corpus to be parsed into a self-regulating metabolic network that natively verifies, modifies, and evolves its own structural integrity. We present Recognitive, the programming language and platform that materialises this architecture. By offloading the burden of structural verification to a deterministic substrate, it unlocks a superior inference-time scaling regime -- one where connectionist compute translates entirely into deep semantic exploration and hypothesis traversal rather than the ruinous computational and financial cost of simulating structural constraints probabilistically. Moving beyond the legacy 'Software Factory' mindset, we outline the theoretical foundations required to ground connectionist intent and arrive fully in the intelligence age.

Multispectral object detection combines visible and thermal imagery to improve perception under challenging illumination and environmental conditions. However, differences in modality appearance and reliability can introduce redundant or conflicting responses, limiting the use of complementary information. Complex fusion mechanisms further increase computational cost, creating a persistent trade-off between detection accuracy and efficiency. To address these challenges, CFGPNet is proposed, a cross-attention-based fused gradient programmed network. The framework incorporates re-parameterized RepViT blocks into the YOLOv9 architecture to strengthen spatial and channel representations while maintaining efficient feature extraction. Cross Computation Efficient Attention (CrossCEA) exchanges spatial attention maps between modalities at multiple detection scales, allowing each stream to emphasize regions supported by the other while preserving modality-specific information. Attention Selection and Aggregation Fusion (ASAF) combines dense feature aggregation with selection of the strongest responses from multiple attention branches to form compact, discriminative fused representations. A programmable gradient information pathway provides auxiliary supervision during training to improve feature learning. This pathway is removed after training, adding no parameters or operations at inference. Experiments on FLIR, M3FD, LLVIP, VEDAI, and MFAD demonstrate favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-offs across three model scales, with the smallest variant requiring 15.3 million parameters and 56.9 GFLOPs. The code is available at https://github.com/NimaHatami99/CFGPNet.

Table understanding is a core task in document intelligence, encompassing two key subtasks: table reconstruction and table visual question answering (TabVQA). While recent approaches predominantly rely on vision- language models (VLMs) operating on table images, we propose a more scalable and effective alternative based on structured textual representations. These representations are easier to process, align more naturally with LLMs, and eliminate the need for language-specific visual encoders, making them particularly suitable for multilingual documents. We present DELTA, which separates physical structure recognition, logical structure recognition, and OCR to extract both layout and content accurately. DELTA outputs tables in Optimised Table Structure Language (OTSL), a compact and unified format that encodes cell arrangements and textual content. On table structure recognition (TSR), DELTA achieves TEDS- Structure scores comparable with state-of-the-art methods across FinTabNet, PubTabNet, and PubTables-1M. We further establish its robustness on non-English tables through our curated Hindi benchmark, TORQUE. Building on this, we introduce TARQA, an LLM fine-tuned on OTSL sequences. Our approach yields gains of 9.3 p.p. on WTQ (TabQA) and 9.2 p.p. on FinTabNetQA (TabVQA), respectively. On TORQUE, our method ranks second among all VLMs and DELTA + LLM variants. We release our code, models, and benchmark at: https://github.com/Tihiitborg/Tables-Decoded

Visual diffusion models achieve remarkable progress, yet they are typically trained at limited resolutions due to the lack of high-resolution data and constrained computation resources, hampering their ability to generate high-fidelity images or videos at higher resolutions. Recent efforts have explored tuning-free strategies to exhibit the untapped potential higher-resolution visual generation of pre-trained models. However, these methods are still prone to producing low-quality visual content with repetitive patterns. The key obstacle lies in the inevitable increase in high-frequency information when the model generates visual content exceeding its training resolution, leading to undesirable repetitive patterns deriving from the accumulated errors. In this work, we propose CineScale, a novel inference paradigm to enable higher-resolution visual generation. To tackle the various issues introduced by the two types of video generation architectures, we propose dedicated variants tailored to each. Unlike existing baseline methods that are confined to high-resolution T2I and T2V generation, CineScale broadens the scope by enabling high-resolution I2V and V2V synthesis, built atop state-of-the-art open-source video generation frameworks. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our paradigm in extending the capabilities of higher-resolution visual generation for both image and video models. Remarkably, our approach enables 8k image generation without any fine-tuning, and achieves 4k video generation with only minimal LoRA fine-tuning. Generated video samples are available at our website: https://eyeline-labs.github.io/CineScale/.

Novel-view synthesis from a single image is a fundamentally ambiguous problem. As the camera moves away from the input viewpoint, previously hidden regions become visible, exposing missing geometry and holes in the reconstructed scene. Existing methods often rely on generative models to complete such regions. However, many of these artifacts are small gaps near depth boundaries and do not require generating new scene content. In order to eliminate expensive process of generating image we introduce ORCA, an occlusion-aware method for reconstructing and completing explorable 3D scenes from a single image. ORCA first introduces 3D structure into a Gaussian-anchor representation using monocular depth while preserving the original camera-ray correspondence. During scene exploration, missing regions are handled based on their size and structure. Small disocclusions are repaired using RGB-D information already available in the reconstruction, while generative inpainting is reserved for larger regions that cannot be reliably recovered from the scene. New Gaussian anchors are added and optimized locally without modifying the existing representation. By reducing unnecessary reliance on generative inpainting, ORCA limits generation-induced hallucinations and better preserves the content and structure of the original scene. On DIV2K, ORCA improves novel-view quality over VistaDream across all reported metrics, increasing MUSIQ from 61.60 to 68.71 and CLIP-IQA from 0.474 to 0.574. These results show that many novel-view artifacts can be repaired effectively by reusing information already present in the reconstructed scene.

Language models can produce plausible short proofs, but may still be unreliable on long-horizon research problems, where progress depends on a sequence of uncertain and interdependent decisions. We introduce Stellar Colosseum, a model-agnostic harness for allocating inference across research in mathematics and theoretical computer science. Colosseum explores alternative strategies before proof construction, uses a readiness gate to decide when a route is mature enough to decompose, represents the proof plan as interdependent section-level subproblems, and routes verifier findings back to the affected part of the argument. Across these stages, it generates candidates in parallel, attacks them with targeted falsification, and combines candidates and their critiques into a single research artifact through overlapping random-sample tree aggregation. The Colosseum workflow has been integrated into Google Antigravity's Teamwork framework as the Long Proof pattern. We demonstrate the capabilities of Colosseum through open-ended research and evaluations on theorem-proving and competitive programming benchmarks. Using Colosseum with Gemini 3.1 Pro, we obtain several new results that address open problems arising from papers published at top venues such as FOCS and JMLR. On TCS-Bench, a benchmark of research-level theorem-proving tasks drawn from papers published at FOCS, STOC, and SODA, Colosseum achieves 71.0% accuracy using Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 3.7 Flash. In a separate Codeforces evaluation using Gemini 3.1 Pro, the proof-oriented pipeline with execution feedback solves 218 of 222 problems.

Vision-based crack inspection depends on segmentation networks whose reliability depends on the quantity, diversity and label quality of their training data. Pixel-level annotations are costly, and crack images of specific structures are scarce. Generative augmentation can supply additional data, but existing methods address isolated steps. They reuse annotated masks, offer limited control over crack geometry, and adopt the conditioning mask as the label without checking it. This paper presents an end-to-end pipeline that produces labelled crack data without manual annotation and assesses the reliability of these data and of the detectors trained on them. Procedurally sampled Bézier skeletons with guaranteed geometric properties are converted into crack masks by a generative adversarial network (GAN). A dual-ControlNet Stable Diffusion model renders the masks as crack images, either on text-described surfaces or on user-provided backgrounds. An ensemble of segmentation networks trained on real images combines its agreement with the inherited label and its internal disagreement into a pixel-wise label confidence. This confidence weights the training loss instead of removing samples with a threshold. The trained detectors are evaluated with image-space probability of detection (POD) and calibration analyses. On CRACK500 and CrackTree200, the pipeline improves five segmentation networks over conventional, diffusion-based and flow-matching-based augmentation, and on CRACK500 confidence weighting yields a higher accuracy than threshold filtering at every tested threshold. On CRACK500, the crack width that U-Net detects with 90\% probability at 95\% confidence decreases from 8.0 to 4.3 pixels, and the expected calibration error decreases from 14.2\% to 9.6\%.

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong visual question answering (VQA) performance, but processing large cluttered images is computationally expensive when only a small region is relevant. Electroencephalography (EEG) signals, which capture human neural responses to visual stimuli, can provide a human-derived semantic cue about the region of interest (ROI). However, EEG-guided visual category decoding remains imperfect, making direct ROI routing unreliable. In this work, we propose BrainFocus, a reliable EEG-guided efficient VLM framework for VQA. An EEG classifier predicts a target category, and a YOLO detector localizes the matching ROI. The VLM receives the cropped ROI only when both predictions pass confidence thresholds; otherwise, it processes the full image. For evaluation, we build on EEG-ImageNet to construct a 40-class benchmark comprising generated cluttered images and real object-centric images, with target-ROI annotations and 600 English visual question-answer pairs. Across Qwen3.5-VL 2B, 4B, and 9B models, BrainFocus improves VQA accuracy by 4.14-9.87 percentage points (pp) on cluttered scenes while reducing input tokens and total tokens by 23.2%-39.4% and 23.2%-39.3%, and end-to-end floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 23.2%-39.5%. These results demonstrate that EEG can guide efficient VLM inference even when its semantic decoding is imperfect.

Clinical data sources such as electronic health records and wearable sensors record patient status repeatedly over follow-up, often at irregular times and on different schedules for different measurements. These data create opportunities for continuously updated, individualized risk prediction. Existing approaches, however, often simplify the temporal structure for model fitting. We introduce Random Hazard Forests (RHF), a survival tree ensemble that estimates how a patient's hazard changes in continuous time as new measurements become available. The method formulates the estimation problem directly through a nonparametric hazard likelihood for predictable covariate processes. An efficient working model guides tree construction, after which flexible time-varying hazards are estimated for each terminal node. Given any predictable covariate path, each tree follows the path through its terminal nodes over time and assembles the corresponding node-level hazards into a trajectory. Averaging these trajectories across trees yields the pathwise hazard estimate. Because routing at each time uses only the covariate state available immediately beforehand, the construction accommodates internal longitudinal covariates without lookahead. Simulations and an intensive care application show that the forest accurately estimates changing risk under irregular and asynchronous covariate updates.

Optimizing industrial process flowsheets is often computationally prohibitive due to the high cost of rigorous simulations and the curse of dimensionality inherent in complex design spaces. To address these challenges, we present a reduced-space multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (RS-MFBO) framework designed for high-dimensional, expensive black-box functions. The approach integrates Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) for dimensionality reduction with a fidelity-augmented Gaussian process that captures correlations between low-cost approximations and expensive high-fidelity evaluations. A cost-aware acquisition strategy, augmented with cooldown and promotion mechanisms, adaptively guides the allocation of samples across fidelities. The framework is validated on two distinct industrial process simulators: a plasmid DNA bioprocess in SuperPro Designer and a green fuel synthesis plant in Aspen HYSYS. Results across diverse economic and physical objectives demonstrate that the proposed method substantially reduces the number of high-fidelity simulator evaluations while maintaining competitive optimization performance compared to single-fidelity baselines. These results highlight RS-MFBO as a scalable, simulator-agnostic approach for cost-constrained black-box optimization.

Efficient inference with Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly relies on Key-Value (KV) caches to store previously computed key and value vectors at each layer. These caches are essential to minimize redundant computation during autoregressive token generation, lowering computational complexity from quadratic to linear. However, the growth of KV caches has posed significant system-level challenges, particularly as model sizes increase, context lengths grow, and concurrent requests compete for limited memory resources. Even though several recent frameworks for KV cache management have emerged, their comparative trade-offs in memory consumption and inference performance have not been fully understood, especially under varying request sizes and model configurations. In this work, we conduct an empirical study of three state-of-the-art KV cache management frameworks: vLLM, InfiniGen, and H2O. These frameworks employ techniques such as tensor offloading, token eviction heuristics, and speculative scheduling to balance memory usage and performance. We evaluate their performance in terms of a range of metrics such as latency, throughput, and memory usage across a spectrum of key parameters including request rates, model sizes, and sparsity levels. Our results pinpoint the conditions for each framework to perform the best, revealing the most suitable selection and configuration of KV cache strategies under memory and performance constraints.

Reliable quantum engineering is essential for turning quantum phenomena into practical technologies. As quantum platforms grow in scale and complexity, their characterization and operation require increasing human effort and coordination. Scientific artificial intelligence agents, which can plan experiments, operate instruments, and analyze observations, offer a promising route towards autonomous quantum engineering. Yet whether current agents can perform reliably in this setting has not been systematically established. To fill this gap, we developed Quantum-Harbor, a virtual laboratory that provides a controlled execution environment for agents to interact with quantum systems. This design enables direct verification of both the actions taken and the conclusions drawn. Building on this framework, we introduce QIQCBench, a benchmark of 49 expert-authored tasks spanning multiple layers including calibration and control, error correction and compilation, sensing and networking. Across 17 frontier agentic systems, QIQCBench reveals wide variation in verified performance. These results expose a substantial gap between demonstrating capability and achieving reliable operation, and establish Quantum-Harbor as a foundation for measuring progress towards verified autonomy in quantum engineering.

Agentic LLM systems that generate code through multi-turn tool use face a fundamental context problem: each session starts from zero, discarding the domain constraints, data schemas, tool configurations, and output preferences that made previous sessions productive. We introduce shared selective persistent memory, an architecture that retains four categories of reusable context - task specifications, data schemas, tool configurations, and output constraints - while discarding session-specific reasoning traces, and that packages them into workspaces transferable across users under role-based access control. The resulting cost curve is non-monotonic. In a controlled replication on four public datasets, where a formatting specification is established once and then withheld, no memory completes 0/12 trials at 3.8K input tokens, selective memory completes 12/12 at 3.9K, and full conversation history completes 8/12 at 7.7K. What is kept matters more than how much is kept: the winning configuration costs essentially what the failing one does, and twice as much context does not improve on it. Both differences from no memory survive Bonferroni-corrected exact McNemar tests (p = 0.0005, p = 0.008); the two memory conditions separate on price rather than completion. We implement this in a deployed platform where agents produce git-versioned artifacts from CSV, SQL, REST, and MCP sources. A complementary zero-token data refresh contract decouples generated programs from runtime data, firing on 12/12 trials at a median 0.08s with no model call, while summary-driven data representation costs 97-431x fewer tokens than raw injection. Across 24 recurring enterprise tasks selective memory completes 23/24 against 19/24 and 17/24, though at that sample no pairwise difference reaches significance.

We submit MéTRON-FR, a 125M GPT-2 pretrained on 92.47M words of French, to the BabyLM 2026 Strict track. It scores 85.97 +/- 0.17% on QFrBLiMP (a native Quebec-French benchmark of grammatical minimal pairs) and 62.80% on the BabyLM-weighted leaderboard. A cross-lingual GLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation) protocol that combines French task-data translation with rank-16 LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) produces a sharp task-type gradient: relational tasks gain measurably, while world-knowledge tasks regress. Bilingual Lexicon Induction aligns the French embeddings to GPT-2 at p@1 = 68.84 +/- 8.61%, 18X above chance, suggesting cross-lingual alignment tracks acquired grammatical competence rather than training duration. An ablation study shows that single-token zero-shot scoring is dominated by tokenizer and template artifacts at the child scale, motivating tokenizer-swap sensitivity, placebo-controlled prompting, and native-language minimal-pair benchmarks as standard diagnostics.

In trapped-ion quantum computers, qubits must be shuttled between segments to interact. The routing logic that schedules these movements is written by hand for every new trap architecture. We present shuttling compilers based on five large language models (LLMs). Each LLM is fine-tuned on shuttling schedules produced by hand-coded heuristics for linear and branched one-dimensional trap architectures. We investigate how the shuttling operation counts of their schedules compare with those of the heuristics and how far they generalize to unseen architectures. For circuits of up to 16 qubits, the fine-tuned LLMs generate valid schedules on both training architectures, more often the fewer qubits a circuit has. In 12% of the compilations yielding a schedule, the best of ten runs needs up to 21% fewer operations than the heuristic baselines, after a rule-based post-processing step. A single run of one fine-tuned LLM produces a valid shuttling schedule for a previously unseen four-way branched architecture. This is preliminary evidence of cross-architecture generalization. On two other unseen architectures no LLM produces a valid schedule. Thus, LLM-learned shuttling compilation is feasible, and we show how far it currently reaches.

Family caregivers of people living with dementia shoulder emotional and practical responsibilities, yet their own wellbeing often remains peripheral to dementia care. We built CareMirror, an envisioned caregiver wellbeing ecosystem with interconnected caregiver- and clinician-facing interfaces for longitudinal reflection, personalized support, and caregiver-controlled sharing with clinical care. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 caregivers, using CareMirror as a design probe to examine how they perceived this ecosystem and what expectations, concerns, and boundaries emerged around clinical connection. Caregivers valued attention to their wellbeing, longitudinal awareness, context-sensitive support, and clinical visibility when it could lead to meaningful follow-up. However, repeated reflection could become burdensome or emotionally difficult, automatic clinical sharing could inhibit candid disclosure, and participants wanted control over what information entered clinical care. They also expected AI to support reflection and communication without replacing caregiver voice or clinician judgment. We contribute design considerations for proactive, clinically connected caregiver wellbeing support.

Hybrid dynamical systems provide a powerful modeling framework for robotic systems, particularly in contact-rich environments. However, ensuring safety and performance in such systems remains challenging due to the intricate coupling between continuous dynamics and discrete mode transitions. In this work, we extend classical Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability analysis, a formal verification method for continuous-time nonlinear systems, to hybrid dynamical systems. Our framework characterizes safe sets for hybrid systems through a generalized value function defined over both discrete and continuous states while accounting for control constraints and model uncertainty. We additionally provide a numerical algorithm to compute this value function. Building on these safe sets, we propose two different mechanisms to integrate performance objectives. First, we introduce a hybrid least-restrictive safety filter that intervenes on both the discrete and continuous components of a nominal controller only when necessary to avoid unsafe states, thereby preserving nominal behavior whenever possible. Second, we formulate and compute hybrid backward reach-avoid tubes, enabling the simultaneous enforcement of safety and goal-reaching behavior, an extension not previously addressed within hybrid HJ reachability. This enables the synthesis of continuous and discrete control policies that guarantee both safety and task completion. We validate our framework through simulation studies and real-world experiments on a quadrupedal robot, demonstrating its effectiveness in hybrid mode planning and safety-critical applications.

Many learned sequential decision systems map the current state directly to an action. That shortcut becomes brittle when candidate actions are numerous, geometrically structured, and rebuilt with the state. One-to-many mobile charging makes this setting concrete: with N=250 sensors, the initial state induces about 1,125 candidate charging-stop actions; each chosen stop simultaneously serves its in-range sensors, and the action universe changes as sensors die. LP-BTS is a learning-guided planning architecture: a graph proposal policy concentrates a small candidate support, a learned value critic evaluates leaves, and edge-budgeted PUCT compares short simulated futures before committing an action. Because the policy scores this set without a fixed output head, a single frozen checkpoint covers every evaluated setting, spanning action universes from 736 to 2,813 stops. Matched ablations reveal complementary effects: uniform sampling costs 8.8 survival percentage points, while, with targeted support fixed, PUCT jointly retains 1.4 points (about 3.5 of 250 sensors) and direct policy selection travels 23% farther. On a prospectively specified, sealed 30-scenario confirmatory bank evaluated once, LP-BTS attains the highest observed survival (0.4545) and alive-AUC (0.8031). Its estimated survival advantage over the strongest domain-engineered comparator is +0.0066 (95% CI [-0.0037, +0.0184]), an unresolved difference, while it exceeds a deadline heuristic and two source-derived direct-policy reconstructions on every paired scenario. Both learned rows are trained, source-derived reconstructions of variants reported by Gong et al. In this setting, the results provide controlled evidence about learning-guided planning in a large, dynamic action space.

Real-time multi-object tracking systems remain highly vulnerable to full and long-term occlusion, where targets temporarily or completely disappear from the camera's field of view. Conventional trackers may terminate trajectories prematurely, resulting in identity loss and reduced situational awareness in applications such as defense and surveillance. This work proposes an occlusion-robust target tracking framework that maintains target identity and trajectory continuity through the integration of YOLOv11n object detection, Kalman Filter motion prediction, and occlusion-aware appearance-based re-identification. The framework consists of three stages: object detection, position estimation during occlusion, and identity recovery after target reappearance. Six Re-Identification (Re-ID) architectures were evaluated within the same tracking framework under identical conditions, with the Occlusion-Aware Mask Network (OAMN) achieving the best overall performance and therefore selected for the final pipeline. The framework was benchmarked against OccluTrack on the public OVIS dataset, achieving relative improvements of 18.1 percent in Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy (MOTA) and 25.1 percent in Identity F1 Score (IDF1), while reducing identity switches by 12.8 percent. On a custom military dataset simulating surveillance and battlefield-like environments with long-term occlusion, the framework achieved a MOTA of 0.734 and an IDF1 of 0.729, corresponding to relative improvements of 14.2 percent and 5.8 percent over OccluTrack. The system demonstrated strong tracking continuity, robust identity preservation, and reliable trajectory estimation under challenging occlusion conditions, highlighting its effectiveness for defense-related surveillance applications requiring continuous target tracking during visibility loss.

Self-evolving agents improve through continual self-play and self-generated learning signals, but their internally generated tasks and verifier signals provide limited coverage of phase-level errors, allowing capability degradation and safety drift to accumulate. We introduce ANCHOR, an LLM-based supervisory framework that delivers evaluative feedback at multiple phases of self-evolution and aggregates reviewed signals into context for subsequent steps. We retrofit two representative open-source self-evolving agent frameworks with ANCHOR, and evaluate them across coding, mathematical reasoning, and safety. Our results show that ANCHOR substantially improves safety performance while maintaining stable performance on the core capabilities of the underlying self-evolving agents. Further analyses provide practical insights for future research, showing that execution-result-based supervision is particularly effective and that increasing supervision frequency yields diminishing returns. Together, these results support external LLM-based supervision as a practical approach to developing safer, more stable, and controllable self-evolving agent systems.

Self-initiated attention shifts play a critical role in voluntary behavior but are difficult to study due to the absence of explicit temporal markers. While previous studies have examined their neural correlates, it remains unclear how multi-dimensional electroencephalography (EEG) features contribute to their characterization within an interpretable computational framework. In this study, we build on an experimental paradigm developed in our previous work, which enables controlled comparison between task-constrained self-initiated shifts and externally instructed shifts under identical visual stimulation. Within this setting, we investigate whether preparatory EEG activity can distinguish these two types of attention shifts. We adopt a machine learning-based approach and conduct two complementary analyses: (1) a performance-oriented assessment of frequency-specific topographic patterns, and (2) a model-based feature attribution analysis using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). These analyses provide a structured view of how spectral features across regions of interest contribute to model behavior. Our results demonstrate reliable within-subject classification performance, indicating that preparatory EEG activity contains subject-specific discriminative information within this paradigm. The analysis shows that higher-frequency bands and frontal regions contribute strongly to model decisions, although such contributions should be interpreted cautiously due to the potential influence of non-neural artifacts in high-frequency EEG signals. Overall, this work highlights the value of interpretable machine learning for analyzing subject-specific EEG signal patterns in a controlled experimental setting, with potential applications in personalized and asynchronous brain-machine interface systems.

Text-conditioned latent diffusion models perform strongly in video generation and are promising backbones for robotic applications. However, existing approaches rely on pixel-level or VAE-based latent representations that lack explicit semantic structure, leaving the impact of the representation space largely unexplored. Slot-based object-centric representations offer a structured alternative by decomposing scenes into object-level latents, or slots. While they have shown success in dynamics modeling and planning, they have not yet been explored for diffusion-based generative modeling. We introduce SlotDiT, a text-guided Diffusion Transformer (DiT) that operates in a slot-based latent space. Given a reference image and a language instruction, SlotDiT decomposes the scene into object-centric slots representing individual entities. Conditioned on the instruction and observed scene context, the model autoregressively denoises future slot trajectories to predict scene dynamics. To systematically investigate latent-space design for diffusion transformers, we compare slot-based representations against VAE-based and semantics-aligned alternatives within a unified DiT framework. Our experiments show that using slots as DiT latents yields competitive video generation quality while consistently improving task-completion rates across four robotic datasets. Furthermore, their compact representation provides a computationally efficient alternative to VAE-based and semantics-aligned latent spaces. Overall, our results demonstrate that object-centric structure is a powerful inductive bias for diffusion-based generative modeling in robotic environments. The project page is available at https://slot-dit.github.io/.

Large language model (LLM)-based judges are widely adopted for automated evaluation and reward modeling, yet their judgments are often affected by judgment biases. Accurately evaluating these biases is essential for ensuring the reliability of LLM-based judges. However, existing studies typically investigate limited biases under a single judge formulation, either generative or discriminative, lacking a comprehensive evaluation. To bridge this gap, we propose JudgeBiasBench, a benchmark for systematically quantifying biases in LLM-based judges. JudgeBiasBench defines a taxonomy of judgment biases across 4 dimensions, and constructs bias-augmented evaluation instances through a controlled bias injection pipeline, covering 12 representative bias types. We conduct extensive experiments across both generative and discriminative judges, revealing that current judges exhibit significant and diverse bias patterns that often compromise the reliability of automated evaluation. To mitigate judgment bias, we propose bias-aware training that explicitly incorporates bias-related attributes into the training process, encouraging judges to disentangle task-relevant quality from bias-correlated cues. By adopting reinforcement learning for generative judges and contrastive learning for discriminative judges, our methods effectively reduce judgment biases while largely preserving general evaluation capability.

This paper investigates easy strategies to boost the performance of existing networks for lidar semantic scene completion (SSC) without requiring complex architectural redesigns. The fact is that, over the last years, SSC methods have mostly pursued architectural innovations, making the models heavier and more complex, e.g., by jointly training a point cloud semantic segmentation branch. In this work, we take a step back and explore two priors used as simple ingredients (possibly noisy) to improve existing approaches: semantic pseudo-labels and sensor visibility information. Concretely, we provide both kinds of information directly as additional inputs to a given SSC network, requiring only a minimal adaptation of the original architecture. We first demonstrate that endowing input point clouds with semantic pseudo-labels from off-the-shelf segmenters significantly improves the performance of existing SSC models. In fact, by evaluating these models against an oracle, we establish that high-quality semantic priors are a primary driver of semantic gains (mIoU), and that the SSC model can be trained just once with ground-truth semantics and then exploited without retraining using any segmenter. Furthermore, we equip the input lidar point cloud with visibility information that distinguishes between empty spaces (between the lidar and a scanned point) and unknown spaces (outside of lines of sight), providing a secondary performance boost across the tested architectures. We study the design space of data for representing visibility information and bound the remaining headroom with a ground-truth oracle on the free-space labels. On SemanticKITTI, these enhancements make older models competitive with state-of-the-art systems across four architectures, in one case even outperforming them. On the SSCBench-nuScenes benchmark, both priors also transfer with the sparser 32-beam sensor.

Contact-rich teleoperation logs expose a policy I/O design choice: demonstrations may contain the robot execution (E), leader command (C), or both. These signals are not interchangeable: E2E may discard contact-generating command offsets, whereas E2C preserves these offsets but omits the robot's execution response. We propose Dual-State Conditioning (EC2C), which conditions on both E and C while predicting future C, exposing command-execution mismatch as a cue for contact, latency, payload, and operator compensation; in quasi-static contact, this cue is often force-correlated. On a low-cost setup without force, tactile, or motor-current policy input, EC2C outperforms E2E and a strong E2C baseline across several real-world contact-rich, force-sensitive, and dynamic tasks. These results support EC2C as a practical default I/O setting for contact-rich imitation learning. We further formulate latency-adaptive inpainting as a temporal extension of this I/O choice for action-chunking policies, and discuss when long histories help dynamic inference or introduce causal confounding.

Given vectors v_i ∈ℝ^d, we consider the problem of choosing a set I independent in a partition matroid in order to maximize the determinant (∑_i ∈ I v_i v_i^T). Our main result is a polynomial-time approximation algorithm that finds a solution of value det ( ∑_i ∈ I v_i v_i^T) ≥ e^-O(d) OPT, where OPT = max_I^* det ( ∑_i ∈ I^* v_i v_i^T). For partition matroids of rank m ≤ d, we give a similar result for approximating the m-dimensional volume spanned by the chosen vectors, within a factor of e^O(m). This matches earlier known algorithms that estimate the optimal value but do not find the corresponding solution, up to a constant in the exponent. Similar to these estimation algorithms, our algorithm is based on the saddle-point relaxation proposed by Nikolov and Singh. A new ingredient is a randomized transformation based on 1/2-stable distributions, which converts the saddle-point relaxation into a more convenient multilinear relaxation.

This paper is the first work at the intersection of game theory and property testing, giving algorithms and lower bounds for efficiently testing whether an allocation mechanism is incentive compatible (IC). We propose distinguishing whether a mechanism is ε-far from being IC, i.e., when it observes many monotonicity "violations." Conceptually, inspired by the literature on Boolean function monotonicity testing, we construct a tester for discrete single-parameter allocation rules. Technically, our work is the first to consider monotonicity testing of vector-valued functions on the hypergrid. We give a Õ(n/ε)-query algorithm to test whether a function (representing n-player allocation mechanisms) is coordinate-wise monotone versus ε-far from it. We also show a matching lower bound: the class of coordinate-wise monotone vector-valued functions on a Boolean hypercube or hypergrid requires (n/ε) queries to test whether it is ε-far from monotonicity, and this holds even if the tester is two-sided and allowed to make adaptive queries. Finally, we extend our upper bound to and give a tester of the same query complexity for pricing functions of allocation mechanisms. This requires overcoming the technical challenge that the path in function space to the closest IC mechanism may involve interdependent changes to both the price and the allocation rule.

Legged robots offer a variety of automation applications in real-world scenarios. But areas that are difficult to traverse, like slopes, caves, or scaffolding, still pose a great challenge for traversal. To tackle this problem, we propose an optimized algorithm for evaluating the full actuatable wrench polytope for arbitrary contact scenarios. With our improved analysis algorithm, the torques for each joint of the robot can be calculated within a control frequency of 49 Hz. The achieved speedup allows for deployment within a regular control loop for actuating robot poses for different contact scenarios. We evaluated our stability controller extensively in simulation scenarios and validated its applicability by deploying it on actual walking robot hardware. The proposed controller achieved stability in very complex scenarios that are currently not achievable by any other controller.

We study pseudometric-weighted correlation clustering, where every pair of vertices carries a nonnegative disagreement weight and the weights satisfy the triangle inequality. For every fixed ε>0, we give a randomized polynomial-time (2+ε)-approximation, improving the previously best known factor of 10/3. Our algorithm extends the cluster-LP framework for unweighted correlation clustering to pseudometric weights. The weighted setting requires controlling both the total weight of admissible pairs and the weighted error in pairwise marginals. Our spectral preclustering preserves a near-optimal solution while bounding the total admissible weight by poly(1/ε)OPT, where OPT is the optimal clustering cost. An aggregated Ptolemy-type inequality yields a degree-product bound and a warm start for random walks within witness clusters, allowing the construction to use walks of constant length. We sample clusters from a bounded sub-cluster relaxation using correlated rounding with a randomized stopping time. An entropy bound and the triangle inequality charge the weighted marginal error to the admissible pairs rather than to the total input weight. Repeated sampling and atom-wise coverage corrections produce an explicit feasible cluster-LP solution supported on polynomially many clusters, with value at most (1+ε)OPT. After rescaling ε, factor-2 rounding gives the stated approximation guarantee.

Dexterous in-hand manipulation requires coordinated control of multiple actuated joints, and a runtime joint fault can abruptly disrupt the contact configuration required for successful manipulation. In this work, we propose residual fault adaptation (RFA), a teacher-anchored framework for compensating for hidden command-channel faults. RFA retains a frozen healthy teacher to provide nominal behavior and trains a recurrent residual policy to infer corrective actions from proprioceptive and command-response history. During training, fault-injection domain randomization (FIDR) varies the fault mode, affected joint, severity, and onset time, while adaptive sampling increases the frequency of fault modes associated with lower recent performance. A frozen Direct FIDR policy provides a distributional reference only on fault-active training samples and is absent from deployment. The deployed controller receives neither fault labels nor controller-switching signals. Simulation experiments on the dexterous hand indicate that RFA can improve manipulation performance relative to the healthy policy under a fixed mixed-fault protocol. Real-robot experiments with software-injected faults further demonstrate zero-shot deployment of the learned adaptation policy.