Professional graphic design is a long-horizon agentic task in which structured, editable artifacts emerge from many interdependent actions, yet outcomes admit no reliable programmatic oracle. We introduce a continual adaptation framework in which a frozen frontier model operates professional design software through more than 230 tools, while an external procedural memory of natural-language skills accumulates and refines reusable design procedures from experience. The memory widens by acquiring procedures for recurring uncovered subtasks and deepens by revising existing procedures against their own successful and failed executions, while a matched replay gate admits only changes that repair failures without regressing observed successes. Five rounds over 1,406 real user briefs and 1,869 automatically graded trajectories, with no weight updates and no human labels, grow the bank from 76 documentation-derived skills to 139 and raise GenEval2 execution success on Claude-Sonnet-4 from 72.7% to 99.3% (+11.99 points in generation quality), with 61.8% and 67.6% win rates against the no-skill agent across four specialized design benchmarks on Claude-Sonnet-4 and Claude-Opus-4.6. We further show the two mechanisms are effective in combination: on 200 held-out briefs from user-traffic benchmark, widening or deepening alone reaches a 49.4% / 48.6% win rate over the no-skill agent, while their combination reaches 58.5% (p = 0.025). Procedural memory offers a practical route to continual adaptation of agents under noisy, unverifiable feedback.

Despite rapid progress, generalist robot policies remain brittle on complex, long-horizon tasks that comprise multiple stages or require repeated attempts and deliberation on the same underlying stage before success. Q-value functions can improve these policies by ranking candidate actions or guiding policy improvement, but learning from sparse task-level rewards entails long credit-assignment horizons, difficult Bellman backups, and broad data-coverage requirements. We introduce SeeQ (Subtask-elicited Q-functions), which instead learns Q-values for the currently active subtask. This shortens the value-prediction horizon and enables effective learning with temporal-difference (TD) objectives. During training, subtask-level annotations present in offline robot data provide the decomposition and enable learning from broad, potentially suboptimal robot datasets. To eliminate the need for human annotations or modular subtask prediction systems at test time, our Q-function architecture is trained to autoregressively predict the active subtask in natural language before estimating its value. We instantiate SeeQ using a base vision-language backbone, pretrain it on diverse open-source robot manipulation data, and finetune it on downstream tasks. Across four real-world manipulation tasks on two bimanual robot platforms, the SeeQ value function substantially improves best-of-N policy steering.

We present MintAct, a family of vision-language models that unifies UI grounding, multi-step navigation across mobile, desktop, and web, and visual tool use, trained at 2B, 4B, and 8B scales. Through careful design of our environments, data, and training recipes, MintAct models match the performance of per-domain specialists across all of these capabilities. To enable this, we develop a scalable environment and reinforcement learning (RL) infrastructure. On the environment side, we host hundreds of concurrent instances across heterogeneous per-domain backends, serving both trajectory data collection and online RL. To enable efficient and scalable RL training, an asynchronous framework keeps explicit control over the cross-domain training distribution and remains stable under noisy environment feedback and off-policy drift. Experimental results show that MintAct achieves state-of-the-art performance (48.9 on OSWorld-Verified) across a wide range of benchmarks at comparable model sizes.

Score distillation methods use pretrained diffusion models as priors for optimizing parameters through differentiable forward models, most notably in text-to-3D generation. Yet the distribution they induce over those parameters is not well understood. Observing that existing distillation methods reduce to one of three: Score Distillation Sampling (SDS), Score Distillation via Inversion (SDI), and Variational Score Distillation (VSD), we extend the particle variational inference view of VSD to the other two. We show that SDS collapses onto the modes of the target, while SDI converges to a contracted version of it, and explain why SDI needs a negative classifier-free guidance scale. Next, we observe that the DDIM posterior mean equals a single Euler step of the probability-flow ODE (PF-ODE). Replacing this step in SDI with a full reverse solve makes the target a fixed point, but it requires solving two concatenated PF-ODEs. Dropping a Jacobian from the resulting gradient gives Probability-Flow Distillation (PFD), which requires solving only the forward PF-ODE. Experiments on synthetic targets, the CelebA dataset, and text-to-3D generation support our analysis and demonstrate the practical effectiveness of PFD.

This article analyzes the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as support for the conceptual modeling of relational databases through the automatic generation of Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams from natural language requirements. The approach combines different language models with prompt engineering techniques to evaluate their ability to identify entities, relationships, and attributes in a conceptually consistent manner. The experimental evaluation involved three LLMs, each subjected to three prompting techniques (Zero-Shot, Chain of Thought, and Chain of Thought + Verifier), applied to the same requirements scenario with progressively increasing complexity. The generated diagrams were qualitatively analyzed through direct comparison with the textual requirements, considering the structural and semantic adherence of the modeled elements. The results indicate that, although LLMs show reasonable performance in less complex scenarios, their reliability decreases as the complexity of the requirements increases, with a rise in inconsistencies, ambiguities, and failures in representing constraints. These findings reinforce that, in their current state, LLMs are not sufficiently mature for reliable use in complex scenarios, and the cost of validation may offset the apparent productivity gains.

Occupational accident narratives contain valuable information about work situations, unfavourable conditions, accident events, and their consequences. Automatically structuring these narratives can facilitate large-scale accident analysis and support occupational risk prevention. However, the terminology and writing styles used to describe accidents vary considerably across sectors and organisations, raising questions about the ability of automated coding systems to generalize beyond their training domain. In this paper, we evaluate the cross-sector generalization of accident-process role classification in French occupational accident narratives. We construct an expert-annotated corpus in which factual units are classified into four roles: work situation (A0), explicitly reported unfavourable condition (A1), accident event or deviation (B), and reported consequence (C). The role classifiers are developed and selected exclusively on 42,244 factual units extracted from 6,040 construction-sector narratives and are then evaluated on unseen corpora from the metallurgy and chemistry--plastics sectors, as well as on an independently collected company corpus, without retraining or target-domain tuning of the role classifier. We compare frozen pretrained representations with task-specific fine-tuning and supervised representation-learning strategies. The results show that task-specific adaptation consistently improves cross-domain transfer over frozen representations. Across repeated training runs, the three leading task-adapted strategies achieved average balanced accuracies between 85.6% and 85.8% across the three target corpora. These findings support the development of transferable assisted-coding systems capable of consistently structuring heterogeneous occupational accident narratives for expert review and cross-sector prevention analysis.

Class disentanglement--the separation of a representation's class-conditional point clouds along depth and over training--is measured by descriptive curves: the sentence such a study wants to write, layer l+1 is more disentangled than layer l, is an eyeball judgement with no null. We supply the inferential layer for a topological measurement of class overlap, the Intersection Euler Characteristic Profile: the Euler characteristic of the overlap of the clouds' ball unions as a function of scale, from one Alpha-complex sweep with no boundary-matrix reduction. Every number carries a test--exact permutation tests in both directions, a guarded separation certificate the invariant requires, and a paired sign-flip test for comparative claims. Building that test taught a lesson outliving this invariant: its statistic must be scale-free. On the raw profile mass, which has units of feature length, 12,375 paired tests return 5,633 significant steps of which every one at the first epoch points the wrong way, certifying feature-norm dynamics as disentanglement; the dimensionless statistic returns 2,707, with 2,026 decreases. Across 111 networks and 52,650 measurements, disentanglement is depth-graded and early, and interaction quotients rank class pairs by confusability (rho=0.83), on par with cheap separability statistics. In a 96-model factorial, augmentation is the one training choice that separates classes relative to chance; weight decay compresses the overlap without separating. Only a k-fold statistic can pose the structural question: the joint entanglement of a class triple sits below its strongest pair in 97% of triple-layer cells and 99.5% of deep cells, at median ratios far below a measured null floor, in vision encoders and frozen language models--a regularity, not a law. The unnormalized mass predicts test accuracy (R^2=0.94), the quotient does not, and neither beats a linear probe.

Saliency methods are widely used to visualize which input features are deemed relevant to a model's prediction. However, their visual plausibility can obscure critical limitations. In this work, we propose a diagnostic test for class sensitivity: a method's ability to distinguish between competing class labels on the same input. Through extensive experiments, we show that many widely used saliency methods produce nearly identical explanations regardless of the class label, calling into question their reliability. We find that class-insensitive behavior persists across architectures and datasets, suggesting the failure mode is structural rather than model-specific. Motivated by these findings, we introduce CASE, a contrastive explanation method that isolates features uniquely discriminative for the predicted class. We evaluate CASE using the proposed diagnostic and a perturbation-based fidelity test, and show that it produces faithful and more class-specific explanations than existing methods.

Safe whole-body control requires coordinating collision avoidance and balance under high-dimensional, nonlinear dynamics--making safety certificates difficult to design and reuse across behaviors. We present LIMBO, a framework for synthesizing a state-action control barrier function and distilling its safety structure into a task policy. LIMBO learns the safety certificate from black-box transitions and a state-based failure specification over residual actions around a frozen base controller, making Q-CBF synthesis tractable in the full control dimension while placing the certificate in the task policy's control space. During synthesis, the learned safety value drives risk-guided sampling near the estimated boundary of recoverability; during task learning, it serves as a teacher that provides action-level safety feedback, yielding a robust task policy and alleviating the need for an online safety filter at deployment. We demonstrate LIMBO on a 29-degree-of-freedom humanoid performing dodgeball avoidance and locomotion beneath low obstacles. Beyond scaling learned Q-CBFs to whole-body control, we show that risk-guided boundary sampling provides a theoretically grounded way to explore the edge of recoverability. Under the same safety specification, ceteris paribus, varying the sampling concentration produces strategies ranging from crouching to a novel backward-leaning limbo maneuver. In both settings, the learned policies transfer to hardware without online safety filtering, showing that learned safety synthesis scales to agile whole-body control.

Quadrupedal robots are increasingly deployed in environments where locomotion must remain robust to disturbances and constrained terrain. Gait type, such as walking or trotting, is commonly used to characterize quadrupedal locomotion. However, gait type does not uniquely define locomotion, as parameters such as duty factor, speed, and stance width can vary within a single gait type. In this work, we investigate the relationship between these gait parameters using three distinct quadrupedal locomotion control approaches. First, using whole body trajectory optimization with LQR feedback, we show that duty factor is a stronger predictor of local error convergence than nominal gait type. Second, we investigate duty factor selection with a learned locomotion controller, suggesting how duty factor may serve as a low-dimensional parameter for adapting locomotion robustness in narrow-terrain environments. Finally, we show that these trends persist under a centroidal model predictive control framework and validate them through narrow-terrain experiments on a physical quadruped. These results show that duty factor provides a simple and effective basis for understanding and selecting robust quadrupedal locomotion across gait types and control architectures.

Reference-to-video (R2V) generation is evolving toward increasingly general and versatile reference control, giving rise to the emerging paradigm of omni R2V generation. However, existing benchmarks fall short of these emerging capabilities: their test cases cover limited reference types and compositions, and their evaluation protocols largely assess holistic reference consistency, overlooking whether reference factors are properly preserved, disentangled, and routed. Meanwhile, the high cost of constructing omni R2V training data makes suitable training resources scarce. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniVBench and the Omni-R2V Dataset for evaluating and training omni R2V models. OmniVBench expands R2V evaluation across broader reference types, fine-grained control tasks, and richer reference compositions, covering 7 task families and 18 fine-grained tasks spanning content, motion, style, structure, narrative, and multi-reference settings. We introduce factor-grounded evaluation with 12,172 case-specific checklist items, assessing whether intended reference factors are faithfully preserved, correctly disentangled and bound to their targets, and properly realized according to the instruction. We further introduce the Omni-R2V Dataset, bringing industrial-grade training resources for diverse R2V tasks to the broader research community. Drawing primarily on a large-scale corpus of professional video footage, it comprises 340K processed training samples spanning diverse reference types and multi-reference compositions. We develop task-specific pipelines for reference-target pair construction, offering a practical and scalable recipe for omni R2V data construction. Extensive evaluation of advanced open- and closed-source R2V models reveals clear performance gaps across task families and evaluation dimensions on OmniVBench, highlighting remaining limitations of current R2V models.

Training capable coding agents via reinforcement learning (RL) requires diverse tasks with reliable verifiers. Open-source codebases offer a rich source of such tasks, while existing methods typically rely on development artifacts such as issues and commits, limiting the range of tasks that can be extracted. To better scale RL environments, we present CodeMidas, an agentic pipeline that turns implemented functionality in existing codebases into executable RL environments using source code as its only task-specific input. CodeMidas allocates agentic compute to every stage of environment construction: agents explore implemented functionality to formulate behavioral specifications, construct tests grounded in execution of the original code, and validate and filter candidate tasks through execution checks and repeated solution rollouts. The resulting dataset has 5,545 training tasks from 3,185 open-source codebases spanning 23 programming languages and 15 technical domains. Training MiMo-V2.5 on these tasks with GRPO improves performance on all five diverse benchmarks, covering issue repair (DeepSWE + 11.7%), whole-program construction (ProgramBench +17%), and terminal work (Terminal-Bench v2.1 +8.5%). Ablations show that increasing the number of high-quality training tasks improves performance. Trajectory analysis shows the RL-trained agent demonstrates better behaviors like increasing codebase exploration and more diverse self-verification. These results establish source code as a scalable foundation for constructing RL environments that improve coding agents across diverse software tasks.

Users increasingly delegate work to autonomous AI agents, yet evaluations typically measure task completion rather than the values users prioritize. Using Value Sensitive Design, we analyzed, with LLM assistance, 73,093 first-person Reddit posts about using OpenClaw, each for its human value, agent aspect, value fulfillment, and user outcome. The 21 values form six value groups, including Autonomous, Dependable, and Affordable Operation, Bounded Reach, Reviewability, and Equitable Access. Relative to each aspect's corpus share, values clustered not at the agent's outputs but at the operating conditions users set around a run. Values were usually met where users described what the agent delivered, in five of six groups, and mostly unmet where users described supervising it, in all six groups. We conceptualize this pattern as value-sensitive delegation. Supporting human values requires attention not only to what an agent accomplishes, but to the conditions users set around delegation, including cost, access, and oversight.

Advances in large-scale neural recording have made it possible to collect data across many animals and distributed brain regions, raising the question of whether this scale can be exploited to learn general-purpose neural representations transferable across diverse downstream tasks. Yet, progress toward this goal has been limited by fragmented evaluation protocols and a narrow focus on individual task domains. Here, we present BrainWideBench, a benchmark for evaluating across-animal transfer on multi-region neural recordings, built on the International Brain Laboratory Brainwide Map dataset of neural and behavioral recordings spanning 276 brain regions from 139 mice performing a sensory-guided decision-making task. The benchmark is organized around three complementary task suites that evaluate whether learned representations support downstream decoding of behavior, can predict masked or future neural activity, and can recover biologically meaningful anatomical organization. With this benchmark, we systematically evaluate pretraining methods across transfer settings, including finetuning on downstream objectives and zero-shot generalization to unseen animals. Our results confirm pretraining improves performance over matched single-session baselines, but we show current methods exhibit heterogeneity in transfer capabilities: gains depend strongly on the alignment between pretraining objectives and downstream tasks. No single approach performs uniformly well across all three suites, and most methods are designed to only address a subset of them. Together, these findings suggest that learning representations that jointly generalize across behavior, dynamics, and anatomy remains an open challenge. By providing a unified and reproducible evaluation suite, BrainWideBench establishes a framework for measuring progress toward general-purpose models of the mouse brain.

Automatic dense packing is widely desired in warehouse operations but remains a fundamental challenge in robotic manipulation. Existing work on irregular-object packing largely targets simulation with idealized contact, treating the object as an isolated rigid body. The gripper often enters as a discrete, post-hoc feasibility check, if considered at all, and the perception and contact drift accumulated during execution are not addressed. We present a closed-loop pipeline that integrates perception, gripper-aware placement optimization, and force-guided execution on a real manipulator. The optimizer represents the object together with the gripper as a single composite body of hierarchical sphere trees. It searches over five degrees of freedom on a GPU within a CMA-ES framework, with the vertical coordinate grounded analytically against the current heightmap. During execution, a force-monitored vertical descent stops on first contact. A post-release consolidation push then closes the residual lateral clearance that gripper-aware planning leaves behind. The container is re-perceived between placements so that drift does not accumulate. We validate the system on a Franka Emika Panda robot packing a 3D-printed set of flat, curved, and concave objects, and a YCB object subset. An ablation study isolates the contribution of gripper-aware optimization, the consolidation push, and mesh-derived geometry to end-to-end success, achieved density, and computational cost. We further benchmark against the heightmap-minimization method as a baseline representative of prior irregular-object packing work.

Traffic sign recognition (TSR) is an important perception task for autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems, where a system must both localize traffic signs and determine their semantic classes efficiently. This work presents a TSR system based on YOLOv2 for simultaneous detection and classification. Two complementary modifications are studied. First, YOLOv2 is extended with intermediate prediction layers, forming a branched architecture that can terminate inference early for easy cases and reduce computation time. Both whole-image and cell-wise branching strategies are investigated. Second, geometric information is introduced to reduce classification errors between visually similar signs. An unsupervised Bayesian image-segmentation method produces binary representations that are compared with class-specific geometric templates inside YOLOv2 bounding boxes. This information is used either during inference or as an additional signal during training. A dedicated dataset is constructed by combining GTSDB and GTSRB samples using seamless cloning and controlled image transformations. Experiments cover ten traffic-sign classes, with 3,000 training and 300 test samples. The selected branched architecture reports 0.647 s runtime and 0.680 mAP, compared with 0.6607 s and 0.680 mAP for baseline YOLOv2. Geometric verification during inference increases mAP to 0.713, while the geometric-feature training variant achieves 0.697 mAP with a reported runtime of 0.6608 s.

Multi-hop retrieval failures are not uniformly distributed across queries: they cluster in structurally predictable subpopulations. We prove two results formalizing this structure. First (CWAR Reducibility): confident-failure reduction is achievable if and only if retrieval features carry mutual information about success, a condition satisfied by LLM-judge pipelines but substantially weaker in dense-only settings, explaining the AUC-AC gap between regimes. Second (Feature Regime Complementarity): no single ANN score feature achieves best predictive performance across all failure regimes; the dominant feature differs between datasets (query length on MuSiQue, hop-1 concentration on HoVer), and a constructive witness pair shows each is necessary in one regime and non-contributory in the other. We instantiate these principles in RegimeAbstain, which computes a Retrieval Confidence Score (RCS), a logistic function of up to nine query-ANN structural features, all available without any additional LLM call, and uses it to implement a calibrated abstention policy. We define the Confident-Wrong-Answer Rate (CWAR) metric and evaluate across three multi-hop benchmarks (MuSiQue, 2WikiMultiHopQA, HoVer) and two retrieval architectures (LLM-judge and dense-only), covering five failure regimes with CWAR from 14.5% to 62.1%. RCS achieves best or co-best AUC-AC in all five conditions against eight confidence baselines. On MuSiQue (LLM-judge), RCS reduces CWAR from 39.5% to 20.6% at 50% coverage (47.8% relative reduction), with ECE=0.035. A model trained on MuSiQue transfers to 2WikiMultiHopQA with only -0.5pp AUC loss, confirming the domain-agnostic structure of regime features.

A desirable property of a world model is the ability to learn continually across tasks, adapting to new environments without forgetting what the agent has already learnt. In particular, the ability to retain and reuse knowledge obtained from prior experiences underpins an agent's ability to efficiently adapt to novel environments, as the dynamics of the physical world can often be described in recurring mechanisms. However, the world model's measure of adaptation entangles two abilities: the speed and capacity to learn unseen tasks, and the reuse of knowledge already acquired, since incoming tasks carry novel content alongside what recurs. In order to isolate knowledge reuse from prior experiences, we propose a compositional continual learning benchmark for world models in robot manipulation. Specifically, we design each task curriculum with compositional tasks that combine aspects of the tasks seen in the sequence. We further factorise this composition along the axes of action and perception to better understand how different input modalities bottleneck knowledge reuse. We evaluate state-of-the-art world models under canonical continual learning methods, alongside a modular world model whose dynamics backbone contains explicitly reusable components. Results show that modularity balances reuse against forgetting better than conventional methods, but none solve the problem fully, leaving clear room for continual world models built to reuse without forgetting. More details are available on our project website: https://object814.github.io/Compositional-Continual-Learning/.

We prove that, over any field, the bilinear complexity of multiplying a 3× 2 matrix by a 2× m matrix is strictly greater than 24m/5. In particular, every exact bilinear algorithm for multiplying a 3× 2 matrix by a 2× 5 matrix requires at least 25 multiplications. Together with the Hopcroft-Kerr upper bound, this proves that the ⟨ 3,2,5⟩ matrix multiplication tensor has rank exactly 25. The proof has been formally verified in Lean 4, with the formalization available at https://github.com/fallnlove/mm325_proof.

Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) are highly sensitive to label noise, since corrupted supervision can propagate through the graph and degrade learned node representations. This work proposes PCC+GCN, a hybrid framework that uses Particle Competition and Cooperation (PCC) as a graph-based label-refinement stage before GCN training. PCC identifies suspicious labeled nodes through particle domination dynamics and determines whether their labels should be preserved, removed, or reassigned before GCN training. The framework also allows the graph used by PCC to be augmented with feature-based k-nearest-neighbor edges, while the GCN itself is trained on the original graph structure and node features. The proposed method was evaluated on ten graph datasets from the NoisyGL benchmark under conventional Uniform, Pair, and Random label noise, as well as under instance-dependent label noise. A detailed hyperparameter analysis was also conducted on Cora, CiteSeer, and PubMed. Under conventional noise, PCC+GCN achieved the highest overall average accuracy and the best average rank among the evaluated methods, with an average gain of 1.67 percentage points over the baseline GCN across the clean setting and all noisy scenarios. Under instance-dependent noise, PCC+GCN remained competitive with the best-performing robust methods while requiring substantially lower execution time, being the fastest robust method on eight of the ten datasets. The results indicate that PCC-based label refinement provides an effective and computationally efficient preprocessing strategy for improving GCN robustness under noisy supervision.

Tactile sensing is central to how robotic systems interact with the real world, yet current solutions face a tradeoff between sensing area and system complexity. This work investigates metallic ultrasound waveguides as distributed tactile sensors fully interrogated from a single proximal transducer. Using cylindrical indenters, we characterized the acoustic response to single and multi-point contacts with varying forces and contact materials. For single point indentation, the applied force was well captured by a linear relationship with the ratio of the reflection to transmission coefficients (F = a * R/T) across all nine tested materials (R2 >= 0.95). The calibration slope, a, correlated strongly with the material's effective contact modulus (log--log Pearson r=-0.98). The reflected energy partition was found to be a load-independent parameter related to the contacting material's properties, enabling material class differentiation independent of force. For the two-indenter experiment, both contact forces were recovered from the waveguide signal and were in close agreement with reference load cell measurements (contact 1, R2 = 0.97; contact 2, R2=0.95). The approach was extended to two-dimensional metallic sheets, confirming both contact localization and material-dependent effects. Overall, these results validate metallic waveguides as a robust platform for distributed tactile sensing, providing contact localization, force estimation, and material-class discrimination for the contacting body.

A selective predictor acts as a safety gate: it returns an output only when the prediction appears sufficiently trustworthy. Deployments increasingly require this reliability to be certified at a target precision for every reporting unit of interest, such as a tool, policy label, or patient subgroup. The main difficulty is often not whether a granted certificate is valid, but whether finite calibration data can produce one at all. As the gate becomes safer or more fine-grained, some units may receive too little evidence to certify. We make this notion of availability computable through classical exact-binomial inversion and formulate reporting-partition selection, under a fixed group order, as a dynamic program that exposes the trade-off among safety, granularity, and served traffic. The resulting frontier reveals a large population opportunity that finite-sample estimation nearly erases: a truth-informed planner gains 0.157 mean coverage over support balancing, whereas a naive estimator recovers only 0.005, making recovery from finite data the central challenge. Constructing candidate partitions on one planning split and selecting among them on another recovers part of this gap, improving mean coverage over support balancing by 0.060, with the direction reproduced in 59 of 60 model effects across three intent-routing datasets and two architectures. A complementary validity-preserving lever, reallocating the familywise error budget across reporting units, recovers additional coverage both with population quantities and noisy estimates. The same frontier recurs, with predictor-specific ceilings, across LLM tool-calling, content moderation, lesion classification, and recommendation. Certified availability is therefore a plannable deployment resource that determines when a safety gate can be certified, at what granularity, and over how much traffic.

Memory systems for large language models have focused predominantly on efficient retrieval, whereas the decision of whether retrieved memories should be trusted has received comparatively little attention. When the memory store contains conflicting positions, standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) blindly injects memories and amplifies hallucinations: in models susceptible to memory injection, the RAG hallucination rate under conflicting memories is markedly higher than that of a memory-free baseline. Inspired by memory signaling mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex, we propose the Memory Decision Layer (MDL), a zero-parameter memory decision controller situated between the retrieval and generation stages. Its core is a three-signal complementary encoder that fuses relevance, reliability, and task risk through QR-based orthogonal subspace projection and a meta-working-memory signal into an interpretable decision representation that quantifies the trustworthiness of retrieved memories. Building on this encoder, MDL explicitly decouples confidence from consistency and introduces risk inversion and explicit abstention. Evaluations on mainstream large language models and multiple open-source datasets show that MDL reduces the hallucination rate under conflicting memories by about 56.04% in general scenarios and approaches zero hallucination in high-risk scenarios. The controller is fully white-box: it relies purely on geometric operations, requires no trained parameters, and adds only about 0.14 ms per decision -- roughly 50x faster than the embedding-retrieval step that precedes it and four to five orders of magnitude faster than an LLM self-evaluation call.

Reinforcement learning is increasingly used to align image generators with reward signals, and Flow-GRPO recently extended this paradigm to flow-matching models by treating the denoising sampler as a stochastic policy that can be optimized from reward feedback. Training in this setting is unstable in a way specific to multi-step denoising: the policy update changes systematically across denoising steps, with importance ratios drifting below one, becoming increasingly dispersed, clipping at different rates, and leaving fewer usable samples late in training. Prior work treats these effects as separate failure modes and addresses each with a hand-tuned stabilizer. We show instead that they arise from a single per-step quantity, which we call path variance. This quantity is determined exactly by the sampler's Gaussian transition kernel and can be estimated cheaply during training. This reframes instability as a resource that can be measured and budgeted rather than a collection of symptoms to repair. Our method, λ-Controlled GRPO, calibrates importance-ratio behavior from this predicted law rather than from noisy empirical statistics, and allocates gradient effort across denoising steps according to their predicted cost. The two scales governing the update are fixed by standard policy choices rather than introduced as free tuning parameters. On a text-to-image model under two reward settings, rendering difficult target text scored by optical character recognition and matching human preferences scored by a preference model, λ-Controlled GRPO improves both text accuracy and preference reward over the strongest empirical stabilizer. It also keeps late-step path variance within its intended budget, precisely where the baseline systematically overshoots. The result is a Flow-GRPO update calibrated by its own transition law rather than stabilized after instability appears.

Current Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving operate primarily through feedforward inference across the perception--reasoning--planning hierarchy. While modern architectures maintain temporal recurrence within the perceptual module, early perception remains blind to downstream reasoning and navigation goals, processing visual inputs agnostically without prioritizing cues informed by prior decisions. To bridge this gap, this paper introduces PRIME, a learned feedback mechanism that conditions the VLA perceptual queries on a novel Situational Memory. By aggregating latent representations of past perception, reasoning, navigation goals, and predicted behaviors across an L-step window via cross-attention, PRIME enables intent-driven perceptual attention at minimal computational cost, adding only a maximum of 29.7M parameters (0.41% of the 7.3B-parameter base model). Evaluated on the Bench2Drive closed-loop benchmark, PRIME achieves a state-of-the-art Driving Score of 82.47 (+4.73 over ORION) and a Success Rate of 60.00% (+5.38 percentage points), the highest reported Driving Score among published VLAs trained on Think2Drive demonstrations.

We need studies on conversational AI (CAI) at scale to understand human behavior and shape CAI design. However, fragmented reporting of systems and study configurations hinders replication, extension, and knowledge accumulation. We present Gricea, an open-science platform representing studies as configurable, deployable research artifacts that researchers can run, inspect, share, and reuse. Informed by a formative analysis of prior CAI research, Gricea couples study procedures, participant-facing systems, and conversational task behavior in. In a replication study using Gricea, we replicated configurations 93% of eligible CUI 2026 papers; while also flagging missing information in 96% of papers that hinder faithful replication --- further motivating Gricea's need. In a user study, researchers and practitioners from diverse backgrounds successfully constructed runnable studies addressing various open-ended research questions. Together, these findings demonstrate Gricea's support for constructing, reproducing, and extending CAI studies through shared research artifacts, enabling cumulative knowledge building through open science.

We introduce QuranicMMLU, a benchmark for evaluating generative AI on Quranic Arabic across multiple dimensions of linguistic complexity. Existing Quranic benchmarks center on general question answering and semantic retrieval, without probing specific linguistic competencies or stratifying by cognitive demand and verse difficulty. We construct a five-pillar Quranic taxonomy spanning Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics, with 31 leaves covering phenomena from tajwīd and root-and-pattern morphology to occasions of revelation and inter-surah coherence. For each leaf we generate questions stratified by Bloom's cognitive level and verse perplexity, then have LLM as a judge to independently answer and score every item and route the annotations to manual review. The resulting dataset comprises 980 human-reviewed questions, each issued in both open-ended and multiple-choice form. We benchmark 12 systems on these items and find that the Islamic-specialized model leads, yet every system scores higher on multiple-choice accuracy (average 84%) than open-ended answer quality (average 60%): the two rankings agree closely (Kendall's τ=0.73), but multiple-choice scoring hides failures that surface only once answer choices are removed. QuranicMMLU thus offers a rigorous, linguistically grounded framework for evaluating Arabic NLP in the Quranic domain.

Conway's 99-graph problem asks whether a strongly regular graph with parameters srg(99,14,1,2) exists. We develop two complementary lines of attack. Fixing one vertex, the conditions λ=1 and μ=2 force its neighbourhood to be a perfect matching and determine every edge between that neighbourhood and the remaining vertices. For (99,14,1,2), the unresolved part is therefore a constrained 12-regular graph on 84 vertices. We encode this reduction in CP-SAT and validate it by recovering the unique srg(9,4,1,2). We also prove by exhaustive enumeration that no circulant graph on ℤ/99 satisfies more than 68.0% of the CAISc constraints, and we give a validated orbit formulation for prescribed automorphisms. We then study the partial-score search problem. Fourteen human-designed search configurations reached at most 69.43%. Separately, we supplied the scoring function to an evolutionary program-search system. It produced a degree-preserving 4-vertex-switch tabu search whose best verified artifact scores 70.73%. The generated move differs from those used in our own searches and crosses a plateau that was stable under them. These results do not resolve the existence problem, but they reduce the exact search space and improve the best verified partial construction found in our experiments.

Millimeter-wave radar enables robust perception in visually degraded environments, yet radar-inertial estimation remains prone to drift: body-frame velocity measurements do not constrain heading and position, and the gyroscope bias, which governs heading drift, is poorly observable over the short horizons of sliding-window estimators. We propose a hierarchical radar-inertial factor graph that separates estimation into a fixed-lag navigation graph, which fuses IMU preintegration, radar velocities, ZUPT, and ground-plane constraints into smooth, low-latency odometry, and a keyframe mapping graph, which combines this odometry with submap registration and loop closures. Loop closures additionally calibrate the IMU: the part of a loop residual explained by a bias error is estimated through preintegration Jacobians chained over the loop interval and enters the navigation graph as a prior on the bias alone. Since this calibration is irreversible, it uses only loop closures accepted by the mapping graph and a cycle-consistency test. Extensive evaluations demonstrate high accuracy and drift-reduced estimation at real-time speeds.

Control barrier functions for port-Hamiltonian systems inherit model uncertainty when the Hamiltonian is learned from data. We show how to propagate this uncertainty into a safety filter with independently tunable credibility budgets. To propagate this uncertainty, we employ a two-stage Bayesian approach. First, posterior prediction over the Hamiltonian yields credible bands for the energy storage, producing Bayesian barriers whose safe sets are high-probability inner approximations of the true allowable set with credibility 1 - (η_ptB). Independently, a drift credible ellipsoid accounts for vector field uncertainty in the CBF inequality with credibility 1 - (η_ dr). Since energy and drift uncertainties enter through disjoint credible sets, the end-to-end safety guarantee is at least 1 - (η_ dr + η_ptB). Experiments on a mass-spring oscillator with a GP-learned Hamiltonian show that the proposed filter preserves safety despite limited and noisy observations.

A novel stability-enhanced Gaussian process variational autoencoder (SEGP-VAE) is proposed for indirectly training a low-dimensional linear time invariant (LTI) system, using high-dimensional video data. The mean and covariance function of the novel SEGP prior are derived from the definition of an LTI system, enabling the SEGP to capture the indirectly observed latent process using a combined probabilistic and interpretable physical model. The search space of LTI parameters is restricted to the set of semi-contracting systems via a complete and unconstrained parametrisation. As a result, the SEGP-VAE can be trained using unconstrained optimisation algorithms. Furthermore, this parametrisation prevents numerical issues caused by the presence of a non-Hurwitz state matrix. A case study applies SEGP-VAE to a dataset containing videos of spiralling particles. This highlights the benefits of the approach and the application-specific design choices that enabled accurate latent state predictions.

Every multiparameter persistence vectorization we know of carries a one-sided Lipschitz upper bound and nothing below it: without a lower gauge there is no sense in which the features are faithful, and no per-prediction guarantee can be built on them. This paper supplies the missing side. COMPLEX is a closed-form, training-free embedding of multiparameter modules -- slice the module along a fixed near-diagonal net, embed each slice barcode by the certified PLACE/PALACE landmark map, concatenate. Under a checkable witnessing-slice coherence condition, holding on 100% of audited pairs on Orbit5k, a single slice carries a closed-form lower gauge: separated modules stay separated in the embedding. With the standard upper bound this gives, to our knowledge, the first two-sided distortion bound for a multiparameter feature map, making faithfulness measurable. Measuring it, we find the floor tight within a small factor of realized distances yet operationally local: an RBF-SVM reaches 91% where 1-NN reaches 78% on the same features. Local per-prediction certification therefore fails for a structural reason common to every landmark embedding whose lower gauge is witnessed by one coordinate. With no learned embedding and no held-out calibration -- only a cross-validated SVM head -- COMPLEX sets the state of the art on both Orbit benchmarks (91.95% on Orbit5k, 92.98% on Orbit100k), level with or above Euler-characteristic surfaces and above transformers and graphcode. On graphs it exceeds GRIL on all four shared molecular benchmarks with one fixed configuration, including the only multiparameter method to clear COX2's majority baseline by more than three points. Closed-form selection -- of the landmark radius, the kernel (certificate-preserving), and the bifiltration set -- buys further accuracy; gradient-shaped adaptation buys none.

Vision-language models (VLMs) rely on storing and transferring appropriate information across their sub-components. Verifying that the VLMs exhibit desired behaviours, while avoiding harmful ones, is central to their reliable deployment. Yet, methods that identify VLM behaviours remain scarce. We present DiaVLo, a diagnostic framework that leverages human curation and VLMs' generation capabilities to construct specifications of desired and observed VLM behaviours, surfacing potential misalignments. Beyond this, DiaVLo also provides causal estimates to identify the most influential concepts steering VLM behaviours. We evaluate DiaVLo on several open-source VLMs under both classification and generation conditions. Our experiments show that DiaVLo produces behaviour labels that correlate with model performance and provide context for measured performance. DiaVLo surfaced behaviours that are clearly aligned and misaligned, alongside patterns in how VLMs perceive, organise, and prioritise concepts.

Gating the value pathway of attention reportedly improves language model pretraining, and prior studies disagree on why. We argue and provide experimental evidence that such gates supply two different things that softmax attention lacks: abstention and noise filtering. The first is abstention, which allows an attention head to output nothing, bypassing the requirement that attention weights must sum to one. The second is noise filtering, which allows the value pathway of an attention head to suppress interference from superposed features in the residual stream. In our experiments in matched models from 10M to 350M parameters, we supply abstention through a learned per-head sink logit in the softmax and noise filtering through a gate on each value. We report three empirical findings. First, the benefit of abstention, measured as the reduction in validation loss relative to a matched baseline, declines as models grow, whereas the benefit of noise filtering increases with scale. In particular, abstention accounts for nearly all of the gain from gating at 10M and filtering for most of it at 350M. Second, the best model at every scale is the one with both primitives built in. Third, injecting controlled interference into the values a head reads confirms that the gate removes such interference, and reveals that each of the two gate forms we study has a characteristic blind spot. Supplying both primitives adds negligible parameters and remains compatible with the key-value cache.

Open time-series forecasting (TSF) benchmarks cover retail, energy, weather, and traffic, but supply-chain logistics remains underserved. We introduce ISOMORPH, the first public digital twin of a multi-echelon logistics network with interpretable, user-configurable parameters and modular topology, demand, and control rules. The simulator advances a directed routing graph in discrete time: demand is served from inventory or recorded as backlog and triggers replenishment throughout the network. The state tracks inventory, outstanding orders, in-transit shipments, and a smoothed demand estimate, yielding Markovian dynamics on a tractable state space. The released data reproduces the bullwhip effect at empirically consistent magnitudes, while three conservation laws provide verification tools for simulator extensions. We release datasets at two catalogue scales (C=50 and C=200), with a 33-rollout scenario library at C=50. These datasets exhibit dynamics largely absent from fixed TSF benchmarks, including variance amplification, cascading bottlenecks, regime shifts, and cross-channel coupling through shared macro shocks. Zero-shot evaluation of three foundation models (Chronos, Moirai, TimesFM) against three in-domain-trained baselines (ARIMA, ETS, PatchTST) spans four targets: demand, backlog, fill rate, and edge utilization. Comparison with ETTh1, Electricity, and Weather shows that ISOMORPH introduces forecasting regimes that differ from standard real-world TSF benchmarks, positioning it as a complementary, regenerable logistics-domain benchmark. The same pairing produces forecast confidence bands across scenario configurations, providing forward UQ from parameter uncertainty and demonstrating foundation models as fast surrogates for digital-twin-based UQ. Code (MIT): https://github.com/tuhinsahai/ISOMORPH. Interactive demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/HyeminGu/ISOMORPH-demo.

Computer-use agents (CUAs) have advanced along two separate lines: graphical interaction and software development through code and the command line. Real digital work requires both, interleaved rather than stacked end to end. We study hybrid CUAs that autonomously decide when to explore an interface, implement software, and run and visually verify their artifacts. We introduce RecreationWorld, a five-platform framework built around recreation: given a running reference, an agent must discover its behavior and build a faithful implementation with no prescribed workflow. RecreationWorld provides reproducible environments on Ubuntu, macOS, Windows, Android, and Web, plus a unified harness with native GUI control and coding tools. The running reference serves as an oracle for hidden behavioral tests, providing execution-grounded rewards. We scale trajectory generation with high-quality open-source applications. Models trained on these trajectories improve across five out-of-distribution coding and hybrid computer-use benchmarks and more frequently verify their rendered outputs, providing evidence of transfer beyond recreation. For held-out evaluation, we introduce RecreationBench, comprising 250 diverse tasks across domains and platforms. Reference-grounded programmatic and visual assertions cover action-conditioned outcomes at multiple interaction depths; each is validated on the reference and by human reviewers before the suite is frozen for automatic scoring. GPT-6 Astra leads at 58.1% overall, but passes all programmatic tests on just 2.8% of tasks. Agents reproduce static interface structure more reliably than interactions and computed outputs, while generated applications remain smaller and more monolithic than their references. We release the benchmark, environments, and test suites.

LLM agents in social simulation revise their opinions implicitly, in context: how open an agent is to persuasion can neither be specified nor verified, and collective outcomes inherit the model's training prior. We introduce Bayesian Chronicle Agents (BCA), a minimal belief layer separating what an agent believes from how it speaks. Each stance is a probability, updated by one Bayesian step per utterance heard. A single prior-strength parameter κ encodes stubbornness, modeled after its role in Friedkin–Johnsen (FJ) opinion dynamics. We then sweep this parameter to yield three canonical regimes of opinion dynamics on demand (consensus, persistent disagreement, committed-minority influence), with persistent disagreement matching the FJ closed-form fixed points at R^2=0.93–0.99. We further show that prescribed κ remains recoverable after the language round-trip, with perfect rank-order recovery across all four models. Explicit belief also makes simulation auditable: the layer surfaces systematic per-model stance biases that end-to-end simulation would silently absorb.

Large language models can hold knowledge they do not report. A model may sandbag on a capability evaluation, or answer against what it internally knows, and its outputs alone cannot tell whether it is hiding an answer or simply does not have one. We borrow the Concealed Information Test, a forensic method that identifies guilty knowledge by presenting a suspect with the true detail among plausible decoys and measuring a stronger response to the item they recognize. Our method, Probe of Internal Recognition (PIR), does the same inside a model. It presents a question with its candidate answers and reads, from the model's internal states, which candidate the model recognizes as correct. PIR is reference-free, needing no honest reference model and no labeled truth corpus. Across eight models from five families (Gemma, Qwen, Llama, Mistral, and Phi), PIR recovers the recognized answer at 0.70 to 0.87 balanced accuracy, well above the 0.28 to 0.40 unknown-item baseline and the 0.25 chance rate. It stays readable across every form of concealment we test, from prompted deception and trained sandbagging to external password-locked and circuit-broken checkpoints, with recognition between 0.85 and 0.93. When the model hides a known answer, recognition stays high. When unlearning removes the knowledge, recognition drops to the level of a question the model never knew. PIR therefore separates a model that will not answer from one that cannot, which supports sandbagging audits and unlearning verification. The signal is causal, adds information beyond black-box behavioral cues, and extends from multiple-choice questions to free-form generation.

The prediction of critical heat flux (CHF), a key safety-related quantity in nuclear thermal hydraulics, remains an important challenge due to its direct relationship with fuel performance and reactor safety. Recent studies have demonstrated that relative to traditional empirical correlations and lookup tables (LUTs), machine learning (ML) methods can substantially improve CHF prediction accuracy. Most ML-based CHF models, however, have been developed and evaluated using tube databases, leaving their applicability to reactor-relevant rod bundle geometries largely unexplored. This study evaluates ML-based CHF models deployed within the CTF subchannel code using the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) rod bundle CHF database. Both pure and hybrid residual correction models are considered in local and semilocal formulations. The tube-trained ML CHF models generally transferred favorably to rod bundle applications and outperformed traditional CHF methods across most geometries and operating conditions. The local hybrid LUT model produced the strongest overall performance, and the semilocal pure ML model remained highly competitive. Comparison against the Bowring correlation, W-3 correlation, and 2006 Groeneveld LUT demonstrated that substantial improvements in rod bundle CHF prediction are possible even when models are trained exclusively on tube data. These findings provide one of the first large-scale assessments of ML-based CHF models in square rod bundles within a production-level subchannel analysis environment and support their broader application in reactor thermal hydraulic analysis.

Productive dialogue alignment requires distinguishing surface coordination (acknowledgments and smooth task progression) from epistemic alignment (convergence of belief states); standard preference-based methods typically optimize response-level preferences without explicitly modeling the latter. We operationalize Theory-of-Mind (ToM) inference as a control signal within Frictive Policy Optimization by extracting, at each referring expression, a four-part belief structure: the speaker's intended referent, the addressee's interpretation, and each participant's model of the other's belief. This makes friction mechanically computable from epistemic-state comparisons, capturing silent divergence, where both participants proceed confidently while grounding to different referents. We evaluate the signal at two levels. At the representation level, ablating the second-order channel reduces misunderstanding recall from 65% to 26%. At the policy level, reward-shaping (FAR) and trust-region (FTR) variants improve intervention F1 and warranted-context calibration over DPO, with Brier scores independently supporting the calibration gains. Across three training runs, FAR and FTR remain substantially more stable, whereas DPO varies widely and can degrade intervention competence already present in the base policy. Thus, ToM-grounded friction provides a trainable signal for context-sensitive intervention under referential belief divergence.

We introduce a low-recourse rounding paradigm for packing problems in fully dynamic settings, which we name Dynamic Contention Resolution Schemes (DCRSs). These are dynamic analogs of (Online) Contention Resolution Schemes (or (O)CRSs) for low-recourse dynamic optimization and offer a variety of benefits. Similarly to their offline and online counterparts, DCRSs for different constraints can be combined to obtain DCRSs for the constraints' intersection. Furthermore, together with the Positive Body Chasing framework of Bhattacharya, Buchbinder, Levin, and Saranurak [FOCS 2023], DCRSs imply competitive recourse algorithms for fully dynamic packing problems with submodular objectives: these are algorithms that, for any input sequence, incur recourse that is itself competitive with the best possible recourse for that sequence. We show the existence of Ω(1)-balanced and O(logrank)-recourse DCRSs for matroid constraints, and Ω(1)-balanced/O(1)-recourse DCRSs for matching and knapsack constraints. In particular, these yield the first non-trivial recourse bound for fully dynamic knapsack, as well as the first competitive-recourse algorithm for non-bipartite matching, and both of these apply even to monotone submodular objectives. Beyond our particular results, we view the DCRS framework as a principled step towards mechanizing the relax-and-round paradigm of approximation algorithms in the context of dynamic optimization.

Most work in computational ethics treats annotator disagreement on moral content as noise to be voted away, collapsed into majority vote or the more permissive any-annotator rule the moment a single annotator flags an item. We argue this uncertainty should instead be modeled and learned from. We introduce Moral Entropy, a Bayesian framework that keeps a full posterior over the true label and decomposes its entropy into aleatoric uncertainty (irreducible disagreement about the moral content) and epistemic uncertainty (from insufficient or noisy annotation) -- and lets any heuristic consensus rule be audited against a calibrated ground truth via entropy methods such as cross-entropy/KL, Brier score, and expected calibration error. Across three corpora and fifteen discourse domains, auditing the standard aggregation rules against this posterior reveals bias that no current pipeline reports: the any-annotator rule disagrees with the calibrated posterior on roughly 30% of items -- pooled, almost entirely false positives, though the errors invert at the foundation level (19.9%/38.9% mean FPR/FNR on MFTC) -- while the stricter majority and two-vote rules miss 63-83% of true positives.

Latent flow models have proven to be a reliable and cost-effective method for time series generation. However, the latent compression induces unwanted artefacts, such as a spectral mismatch with respect to the underlying dataset, thus hindering their use as training surrogates. In this article, we propose a spectrally-aligned latent-flow time series generator, where the latent space for flow matching is trained to preserve dynamical properties that are relevant for the suitability of synthetic samples. We find that incorporating fine-tuning losses based on canonical signal representations such as the Fourier, wavelet and signature transforms helps overcome these issues. The interpretability of these transformations allows us to ensure that the synthetic signals are aligned with the true ones in terms of relevant features, such as smoothness or targeted spectral content, as opposed to relying on pointwise reconstruction losses only. We compare the proposed aligned models against a base latent-flow model and the state of the art over real-world long-range univariate and multivariate benchmark datasets. Our quantitative results validate the superiority of the proposed method in terms of its performance on metrics reflecting signal realness and computational efficiency, while being aligned to the training set with respect to its local structure.

Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) approximates a nonnegative matrix, X, by the product of two nonnegative factors, WH, where W has r columns and H has r rows. In this paper, we consider NMF using the component-wise L1 norm as the error measure (L1-NMF), which is suited for data corrupted by heavy-tailed noise, such as Laplace noise or salt and pepper noise, or in the presence of outliers. Our first contribution is an NP-hardness proof for L1-NMF, even when r=1, in contrast to the standard NMF that uses least squares. Our second contribution is to analyze, under simplified probabilistic assumptions, how the sparsity in the data enforces zero solution in the optimal scalar update in the factors of L1-NMF when all the other entries are kept fixed. This provides an intuition of the connection between the sparsity of the L1-NMF factors with the sparsity of the input. Even though sparsity favors interpretability, if the data is affected by false zeros, too sparse solutions might degrade the model. Our third contribution is a new, more general, L1-NMF model for sparse data, dubbed weighted L1-NMF (wL1-NMF), where the sparsity of the factorization is controlled by adding a penalization parameter to the entries of WH associated with zeros in the data. The fourth contribution is a new coordinate descent (CD) approach for wL1-NMF, denoted as sparse CD (sCD), where each subproblem is solved by a weighted median algorithm. Although it lacks convergence guarantees to a stationary point, sCD is, to the best of our knowledge, the first algorithm for L1-NMF whose complexity scales with the number of nonzero entries in the data, making it efficient in handling large-scale, sparse data. We perform extensive numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world data, including imaging mass spectrometry and topic modeling, to show the effectiveness of our new proposed model (wL1-NMF) and algorithm (sCD).

The advancement of next-generation Wi-Fi technology heavily relies on sensing capabilities, which play a pivotal role in enabling sophisticated applications. In response to the growing demand for large-scale deployments, contemporary Wi-Fi sensing systems strive to achieve high-precision perception while maintaining minimal bandwidth consumption and antenna count requirements. Remarkably, various deep learning-driven perception technologies have demonstrated the ability to surpass conventional resolution limits. However, the theoretical underpinnings of this phenomenon have not been thoroughly investigated in existing research. We find that under hardware-constrained conditions, the performance gains of deep learning in Wi-Fi sensing primarily originate from two aspects: prior information and temporal correlation, which act as specific forms of side information that reduce the estimation error bound. We construct a deep learning-based Wi-Fi sensing system using only a single transceiver pair and design experiments to validate these gains. The system achieves an average human pose estimation error of 0.2189 m and an average localization error of 0.6124 m, while operating in real time at 42 fps on commodity hardware.

Reusing manipulation experience across robot embodiments is important for scaling robot learning and reducing repeated task-specific data collection. However, changes in embodiment alter visual appearance, action dimensionality and semantics, and the whole-body configurations that can realize the same tool pose. We present SkelWAM, a skeleton-guided world-action model that couples perception and control through one explicit geometric representation for single-source cross-embodiment manipulation. Arm centerline geometry, tool-center-point (TCP) pose, and parallel-jaw commands form a shared 25-D state. The same definition underlies canonical third-person and wrist observations and future whole-body action targets. Trained with predictive visual supervision, a video-action mixture of transformers predicts canonical skeleton action chunks, which embodiment-specific constrained decoders convert into joint or continuum-robot controls. This formulation requires no one-to-one joint correspondence and uses no target-task demonstrations or target policy updates. We introduce LIBERO-Cross10, a source-only cross-embodiment transfer benchmark covering ten tasks and ten target embodiments across four morphological groups. On this benchmark, Franka-trained SkelWAM achieves 43.3% success over 1,000 episodes, exceeding the best-performing evaluated baseline by 36.2 percentage points. We further deploy a JAKA mini2-trained policy on the Feagine A03 continuum robot for three tabletop manipulation tasks, illustrating the approach's potential for real-world cross-embodiment manipulation. Project page: http://www.liukepku.com/skelwam/index.html

During manipulation, robot and scene motion can move previously observed regions outside the camera's field of view. Geometry-aware RGB features encode visible structure, while control under partial observability requires scene memory that integrates observation history and grounds inferred content in current evidence. We introduce (Look, Imagine, Focus, and Do), a framework for persistent, 3D-aware scene memory. LIFD learns scene tokens through multi-view agreement, then completes them from a single RGB view and recurrent memory using rectified flow. Anchor-Guided Cross-Attention anchors generation to current geometry-aware features, and compact slot features condition a visuomotor policy. Multi-view and geometric supervision are used during representation learning; deployment requires one RGB camera, proprioception, and a task instruction. LIFD (Staged) reaches 91.6% average success on LIBERO and 79.8% on MetaWorld, improving LIBERO average success by 11.1 percentage points over Joint training. After policy-head adaptation with ten demonstrations per family, LIFD achieves 56.0% mean success across four UR5e task families, compared with 40.5% for OpenVLA-7B.

Robot demonstration collection often produces imperfect or failed trajectories in addition to successful demonstrations. Existing methods typically exploit failed trajectories by identifying segments that still make progress toward task completion, but largely overlook failure-critical behaviors that directly lead to task failure. Here we argue that these two types of segments provide fundamentally asymmetric supervision: progressive segments should be imitated, whereas failure-critical segments should be explicitly avoided. Based on this observation, we propose CARF, a Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-guided framework for learning from imperfect robot data. CARF introduces a progress-based importance scorer, trained solely on successful expert demonstrations and its perturbation results, to estimate step-wise contributions toward task completion and identify informative regions in failed trajectories. These scores guide a unified flow-matching objective that attracts the policy toward progressive behaviors and repels it from failure-critical ones, while excluding ambiguous segments. This enables more comprehensive utilization of imperfect data and avoids unreliable supervision from ambiguous failure segments. Extensive experiments in simulation and the real world demonstrate consistent improvements over competing baselines across diverse failure scenarios, with ablations further validating the effectiveness of the proposed scoring and attraction-repulsion mechanisms. Our website is https://zhao-sq.github.io/carf/#.

Dexterous manipulation requires coordinated multi-finger control and effective tactile feedback, yet learning these capabilities remains challenging due to the lack of large-scale real-world data and the difficulty of extracting effective representations from sparse tactile signals. We build a robot platform and teleoperation system to collect a 200-hour bimanual dexterous manipulation dataset with synchronized visual, tactile, and language annotations, comprising 10,576 trajectories across 65 tasks, 69.5% of which involve dexterous multi-finger manipulation. We further propose STAR, an integrated training recipe for vision-tactile-language-action (VTLA) models that addresses the spatial, temporal, and informational sparsity of tactile signals through visual-tactile joint pre-training, sparse-global tactile token representation, and sparse future tactile prediction. Trained on this dataset, STAR achieves a 61% average success rate across four real-world tasks with 100 post-training trajectories per task, demonstrating dexterous performance under task-specific post-training.

Natural-language instructions specify manipulation goals but leave the robot's motion underdetermined. We present AntiGrounding, a visual action-selection framework built around a dual geometric–visual trajectory interface. Each short trajectory retained after feasibility filtering remains an explicit motion plan and serves as a visual prompt for instruction-conditioned vision–language model (VLM) assessment. Structured multi-view visual question answering (VQA) scores safety, task alignment, efficiency, and physical plausibility. Weighted view fusion aggregates these scores for trajectory selection, while the scores also guide subsequent translational proposals. Separate orientation and gripper controls coordinate physical interaction. Planning proceeds in an initialized digital twin, which validates selected segments before the real robot executes the same waypoint sequences. Across eight real-world manipulation tasks, AntiGrounding with a single GPT-6 Astra evaluator achieves % overall success. Under the reported deployment protocol, π_0.5 achieves %, and a PIVOT-style visual proposal-selection baseline with the same evaluator achieves %. Component ablations and evaluator sensitivity characterize trajectory assessment, proposal search, orientation control, and evaluator choice. Performance depends on digital-twin fidelity and physical interaction.

We introduce Multiplicatively Optimistic Regret Matching (MORM), an uncoupled learning rule for finite general-sum games. Under simultaneous full-information self-play, every player achieves external regret O(√(n)log d) uniformly over all horizons, using only one-step optimism. The analysis combines a potential-based regret-matching argument with multiplicative stability and Hellinger control of strategy movement. A learning-rate safeguard additionally gives O(√(Tlog d)) regret in the face of adversarial utilities.

This study presents an architectural and experimental cross-generation analysis of Ultralytics YOLO27 (YOLOv27), YOLO26 (YOLOv26), YOLO11 (YOLOv11), and YOLOv8 for fine-grained robotic perception in complex orchard environments. Fine-grained detection and instance segmentation of early-stage fruit anatomy remain challenging in complex orchard environments because of limited pixel footprints, green-on-green similarity, occlusion, and substantial scale variation. Because YOLO27 has been announced but its public implementation and trainable segmentation models are not yet available, the present study provides an architectural analysis of YOLO27, while controlled experiments benchmark YOLOv8, YOLO11, and YOLO26; YOLO27 experiments will be incorporated following public model availability. Five model scales-nano (n), small (s), medium (m), large (l), and extra-large (x)-were evaluated for fruitlet, calyx, and peduncle detection and segmentation using conventional 640 x 640 and small-object-focused 960 x 960 configurations, yielding 30 experiments. YOLO11s-960 achieved the highest observed mask mAP@50:95(0.402) and box mAP@50:95(0.426), whereas YOLO26s-960 achieved comparable values of 0.397 and 0.425 with only 10.37~M parameters and 34.1~GFLOPs. Peduncle remained the most challenging class, and increasing model capacity did not consistently improve accuracy. Overall, compact-to-moderate YOLO models combined with small-object-focused training provided favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-offs, establishing a reproducible benchmark for fine-grained agricultural robotic perception. Code, trained models, and experimental configurations are publicly available, and will be updated through our Github Link: https://github.com/rnjnspkt/Optimizing-and-Comparing-Ultralytics-YOLOv26-YOLOv11-and-YOLOv8-for-Small-Object-Detection-and-Seg

We introduce NemotronLabs VoiceChat, an open full-duplex speech-to-speech model with native tool-calling capabilities. NemotronLabs VoiceChat combines a streaming speech encoder and decoder-only language model with parallel specialized output streams for agent text and structured function calls, an auxiliary RNN-T branch for incremental user transcription, and a streaming TTS decoder. This design enables the model to listen, transcribe, reason, invoke tools, and speak within a unified streaming architecture while preserving the temporal behavior required for natural conversation. On Full-Duplex-Bench 1.0, NemotronLabs VoiceChat achieves the lowest pause-handling takeover rates among evaluated open-weight systems, 100\% takeover following user interruptions, and a 4.33/5 post-interruption response-quality score. On Full-Duplex-Bench 1.5, it resumes its response after user backchannels in 93\% of cases. NemotronLabs VoiceChat obtains a 55.1 normalized average on VoiceBench and, on Full-Duplex-Bench 3.0 (FDB 3.0), achieves 82.5\% tool-selection F1, while argument accuracy and end-to-end tool execution remain areas for improvement. These results demonstrate that full-duplex interaction, speech recognition and generation, general language capabilities, and external tool use can be integrated in a single open speech-to-speech model without sacrificing real-time conversational behavior.

We study offline constrained reinforcement learning from human feedback with multiple preference oracles. Motivated by applications that trade off performance with safety or fairness, we aim to maximize target population utility subject to a minimum protected group welfare constraint. From pairwise comparisons collected under a reference policy, we estimate oracle-specific rewards via maximum likelihood and analyze how statistical uncertainty propagates through the dual program. We cast the constrained objective as a KL-regularized Lagrangian whose primal optimizer is a Gibbs policy, reducing learning to a convex dual problem. We propose a dual-only algorithm that ensures high-probability constraint satisfaction and provide the first finite-sample performance guarantees for offline constrained preference learning. Finally, we extend our theoretical analysis to accommodate multiple constraints and general f-divergence regularization.

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) carry subject-specific patterns enabling reliable individual discrimination, forming the basis of ECG biometrics. Beyond authentication, this paradigm holds significant potential to secure sensitive cardiac data and to serve as a pretext task in self-supervised learning. Yet, most studies remain confined to singlesession, resting data, leaving robustness to temporal and physiological variations largely untested. We address this gap by evaluating ECG biometrics under realistic conditions involving exercise-induced stress and cross-session variability. A Siamese ResNet with late multi-lead fusion strategy is trained on a large ECG dataset extracted from cardiopulmonary exercise tests and evaluated with a exercise-and time-aware protocol, as well as on public benchmarks. This first extensive assessment of ECG biometrics under combined physiological and temporal variability achieves an intra-session rest-to-peak EER of 1.7% and stateof-the-art 3.9% on the CYBHi dataset. Findings support the presence of an intrinsic cardiac signature resilient to physiological and temporal drift.

Addressing critical global challenges, from food security and disaster risk to disease outbreaks and socio-economic vulnerability, demands high-fidelity geospatial modeling. However, building predictive planetary models remains bottlenecked by a fragmented data ecosystem, requiring manual data retrieval, multimodal data curation and fusion along with iterative model selection. We present the Planetary Prediction Engine (PPE), an autonomous AI system that executes this end-to-end workflow directly from natural-language queries. PPE synthesizes multimodal datasets on the fly, retrieving spatiotemporally relevant covariates across open-web and Earth observation platforms (Data Commons, Google Earth Engine) and fusing them with geospatial foundation model embeddings (PDFM, AlphaEarth). Simultaneously, it searches over task-tailored model architecture families with automated overfitting guards. Across diverse tasks, geographies, and scientific domains, PPE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art or manually tuned expert baselines. For US spatial regression, PPE improves mean R^2 across 21 CDC health indicators (76.8

Masked discrete diffusion models are commonly accelerated using the so-called tau-leaping discretization method, which reveals several coordinates in parallel at each sampling step. The sampler replaces the joint conditional law of each revealed block by a product distribution, incurring a factorization error ε_fact present even with perfectly learned predictors. We analyze the standard sampler on N coordinates with K sampling steps, whose random block sizes depend on a denoising schedule. Our analysis uses an exact integral representation of ε_fact in terms of a distribution-dependent dependence density ρ, which records how conditional dependence evolves as the revealed fraction of coordinates grows. We develop estimators for this profile and quantify how estimation errors affect schedule selection. We derive recursive stationarity equations for the finite-K optimization problem and, under a monotonicity condition, characterize its unique optimizer. In the joint limit N,K→∞, we obtain an explicit characterization of the optimal limiting smooth schedule and quantify the cost of random block sizes relative to a deterministic planner. When ρ_N converges uniformly to a strictly positive continuous profile, optimizing over fixed smooth schedules can improve the leading constant but not the N/K scaling of ε_fact. By contrast, if ρ_N degenerates, suitable schedules can improve the asymptotic order relative to the uniform schedule. Examples based on stationary processes and exchangeable mixtures illustrate these two regimes.

The Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) framework enables the construction of surrogate models of complex nonlinear and high-dimensional systems, facilitating efficient stability and performance analysis together with controller design. Despite significant advances in data-driven LPV modelling, existing approaches do not quantify the uncertainty of the obtained LPV models. Consequently, assessing model reliability for analysis and control or detecting operation outside the training regime requires extensive validation and user expertise. This paper proposes a Bayesian approach for the joint estimation of LPV state-space models, including their scheduling map, together with characterization of the model uncertainty and confidence bounds on the predicted model response directly from input-output data. Both aleatoric uncertainty due to measurement noise and epistemic uncertainty arising from limited training data and structural bias are considered. The resulting model preserves the LPV structure required for controller synthesis while enabling computationally efficient simulation and uncertainty propagation. The approach is demonstrated on the surrogate modelling of a two-dimensional nonlinear interconnection of mass-spring-damper systems.

In a recreational column of the Scientific American, Martin Gardner presented in 1973 a game called Racetrack, consisting of computing an optimal trajectory for a vehicle on a race circuit, subject to acceleration constraints in discrete space ℤ^2. In this model, each step consists of changing the position of the vehicle by a vector in ℤ^2, with the constraints that two consecutive vectors differ by at most one unit in each dimension. We investigate two problems related to this model in arbitrary dimension in open space (no obstacles), where a configuration of the vehicle consists of its current position and the last-used vector (concretely, a value in ℤ^d ×ℤ^d). The two problems are the following. In BRANCHING COST, two configurations are given and the goal is to compute the minimum number of moves (length of a trajectory) between the two configurations. BRANCHING TRAJECTORY has the same input and asks for a description of the trajectory. We obtain various results. First, we revisit known approaches solving BRANCHING COST in 2D, clarifying the analysis and showing that this problem can be solved in constant time in any fixed number of dimensions d (more generally, in O(d log d) time). We also show that BRANCHING TRAJECTORY can also be solved in constant time for any fixed d, despite the fact that the length of the trajectory is not constant. The main ingredient is to show that there always exists at least one optimal trajectory that can be compactly represented using only O(1) intermediate configurations, with monotonic evolution between them. Among other uses, the latter implies that computing an optimal trajectory that visits a sequence of n points at prescribed velocities in 2D or 3D can be done in linear time in the number of points.

Training high-capacity vision models from scratch requires substantial computational resources. To improve training efficiency of a wide target model, existing growth methods often assume the availability of narrower models, obscuring the true computational cost of the entire pipeline. We propose an efficient training protocol, RBDC, that builds wide models by coupling in a parameter-free block-diagonal way narrower, independently trained models in a recursive way. This allows a flexible allocation of the training budget available across all the models involved. Evaluated with vision transformers (DeiT) and convolutional networks (ResNet) on ImageNet, our RBDC training protocol shows a much better efficiency than models trained from scratch with the standard protocol, yielding 30% FLOPs reduction at similar test accuracies. It also achieves higher performances at same training FLOPs than training protocols from the model growth literature. Finally, we show that our models can serve as better backbones than their original counterparts for downstream object detection and instance segmentation tasks.