mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SMOPD: Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning via Specialize-and-Merge Online Policy Distillation

arXiv 2608.03092 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

We aim to improve model performance in multi-reward reinforcement learning training process. Existing Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO) has mitigated the issue of reward signals masking one another during direct scalarization by normalizing each reward dimension separately before aggregation. However, our experiments show that GDPO still struggles to balance reward signals with different granularities. Specifically, in some particular training tasks, the model may receive a dense reward that assigns fine-grained scores ranging from 0.1 to 1.0, together with a sparse reward that provides only binary feedback of either 0 or 1. In such cases, we find that the sparse reward may provide an insufficient optimization signal, preventing its corresponding capability from being effectively reinforced. Therefore, how can we strengthen the optimization signal from the sparse reward without sacrificing the capability already learned from the fine-grained reward? To overcome this limitation, we propose Specialize-and-Merge Online Policy Distillation (SMOPD), a two-stage training method for multi-reward optimization. Stage1-Specialize: SMOPD first employs reward-priority configurations to train multiple reward-specialized teachers, allowing each reward to be learned under conditions where its signal can effectively drive optimization. Stage2-Merge: SMOPD then utilizes online policy distillation to combine the reward-specialized capabilities of these teachers into a single student policy, while maintaining balanced task-level optimization. To validate our method, we conduct experiments on two multi-reward settings: complementary rewards(tool-calling accuracy and format) and conflicting rewards (helpful and harmless rewards). Based on above settings, SMOPD outperforms GDPO across 1.5B, 3B and 7B backbones.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

29 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization8 Jan

Other references · 28

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  7. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  9. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  10. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  11. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  12. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
16 more
  1. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  2. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  3. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  4. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  5. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  6. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  7. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  8. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 574
  9. 2025ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needscited by 342
  10. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 232
  11. 2024DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 145
  12. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 145
  13. 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 121
  14. 2023f-Divergence Minimization for Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 112
  15. 2024WARP: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Rewarded Policiescited by 42
  16. 2026Prefix-Guided On-Policy Distillation: Mining Golden Trajectories from Rolloutscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026GD2PO: Mitigating Multi-Reward Conflicts via Group-Dynamic reward-Decoupled Policy Optimization
  2. 2026REOPD: Reliability-Adaptive Reward Extrapolation for On-Policy Distillation
  3. 2026MDP-GRPO: Stabilized Group Relative Policy Optimization for Multi-Constraint Instruction Following
  4. 2026GOPO: Policy Optimization using Ranked Rewards
  5. 2026Learning beyond Teacher: Generalized On-Policy Distillation with Reward Extrapolation
  6. 2025Learning a Pessimistic Reward Model in RLHF
  7. 2025BNPO: Beta Normalization Policy Optimization
  8. 2026Unifying Group-Relative and Self-Distillation Policy Optimization via Sample Routing