mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tangent Space Fine-Tuning for Directional Preference Alignment in Large Language Models

arXiv 2602.01128 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Our goal is to enable large language models (LLMs) to balance multiple human preference dimensions; such as helpfulness, safety, and verbosity, through principled and controllable alignment. Existing preference optimization methods, including Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), collapse feedback into a single scalar reward, fixing one balance among objectives and preventing traversal of the Pareto front. Recent work by Ortiz-Jimenez et al. (2023) showed that fine-tuning can be viewed in a model's tangent space, where linearized updates act as additive vectors that can be composed to jointly perform well on multiple tasks. Building on this formulation, we extend this idea to preference alignment and propose Tangent-Space Direct Preference Optimization (TS-DPO), which performs DPO within this locally linear regime to learn per-objective update directions. These directions can be linearly combined at inference to generate user-specified behaviors without additional optimization. Evaluated on the helpfulness-verbosity trade-off using the HelpSteer and UltraFeedback datasets, TS-DPO achieves broader Pareto-optimal coverage and smoother preference control than scalarized DPO. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) further shows that tangent-space training amplifies canonical directions aligned with distinct preferences, improving disentanglement.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 4 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.

Builds on

4 of 8 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards28 Feb

Other references · 3

  1. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
  2. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
  3. 2023SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHFcited by 107

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
  2. 2024Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
  3. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
  4. 2026Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation
  5. 2024Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models
  6. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
  7. 2024Triple Preference Optimization: Achieving Better Alignment using a Single Step Optimization
  8. 2024sDPO: Don't Use Your Data All at Once