VC-Soup: Value-Consistency Guided Multi-Value Alignment for Large Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape content generation, interaction, and decision-making across the Web, aligning them with human values has become a central objective in trustworthy AI. This challenge becomes even more pronounced when aligning multiple, potentially conflicting human values. Although recent approaches, such as reward reweighting, prompt-based supervised fine-tuning, and model merging, attempt to tackle multi-value alignment, they still face two major limitations: (1) training separate models for each value combination is prohibitively expensive; (2) value conflicts substantially degrade alignment performance. These limitations make it difficult to achieve favorable trade-offs across diverse human values. To address these challenges, we revisit multi-value alignment from the perspective of value consistency in data and propose VC-soup, a data filtering and parameter merging framework grounded in value-consistent learning. We first design a value consistency metric based on the cosine similarity between the reward-gap vector of each preference pair and an all-ones vector, which quantifies its cross-value coherence. We then filter out low-consistency preference pairs in each value dataset and train on the remaining data to obtain smooth, value-consistent policy models that better preserve linear mode connectivity. Finally, we linearly combine these policies and apply Pareto filtering across values to obtain solutions with balanced multi-value performance. Extensive experiments and theoretical analysis demonstrate that VC-soup effectively mitigates conflicts and consistently outperforms existing multi-value alignment methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.
Builds on
32 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Multi-Value Alignment for LLMs via Value Decorrelation and Extrapolation15 Nov
- 2024MAP: Multi-Human-Value Alignment Palette24 Oct
- 2024PAD: Personalized Alignment of LLMs at Decoding-Time5 Oct
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging17 Oct
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback2 Oct
- 2023From Instructions to Intrinsic Human Values -- A Survey of Alignment Goals for Big Models23 Aug
Other references · 26
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
- 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 378
- 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 252
14 more
- 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 232
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 171
- 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 145
- 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 140
- 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic βcited by 89
- 2021Learning Fair Representations for Recommendation: A Graph-based Perspectivecited by 50
- 2023Value FULCRA: Mapping Large Language Models to the Multidimensional Spectrum of Basic Human Valuescited by 49
- 2025Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPOcited by 21
- 2025Self-Improvement Towards Pareto Optimality: Mitigating Preference Conflicts in Multi-Objective Alignmentcited by 15
- 2025Bone Soups: A Seek-and-Soup Model Merging Approach for Controllable Multi-Objective Generationcited by 13
- 2026Maximizing Local Entropy Where It Matters: Prefix-Aware Localized LLM Unlearningcited by 10
- 2024Unlocking Decoding-time Controllability: Gradient-Free Multi-Objective Alignment with Contrastive Promptscited by 9
- 2026BalDRO: A Distributionally Robust Optimization based Framework for Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 8
- 2025Graph-Structured Driven Dual Adaptation for Mitigating Popularity Biascited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026VALUEFLOW: Toward Pluralistic and Steerable Value-based Alignment in Large Language Models
- 2025DiverValue-Bench: A Benchmark and Fine-Tuning Framework for Aligning Large Language Models with Diverse Human Values
- 2026Toward Stable Value Alignment: Introducing Independent Modules for Consistent Value Guidance
- 2026VISA: Value Injection via Shielded Adaptation for Personalized LLM Alignment
- 2025Internal Value Alignment in Large Language Models through Controlled Value Vector Activation
- 2025Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges
- 2025VAL-Bench: Belief Consistency as a measure for Value Alignment in Language Models
- 2023On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment