MOCHA: Multi-Objective Chebyshev Annealing for Agent Skill Optimization
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent skill learning and evolution
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM agents organize behavior through skills -- structured natural-language specifications that govern how an agent reasons, retrieves, and responds. Unlike monolithic prompts, skills are multi-field artifacts with platform limits: descriptions are indexed for routing, instruction bodies are loaded into a shared context window, and every extra line costs the agent context it could spend elsewhere. Skill optimization is therefore inherently multi-objective: a skill should be accurate and economical at once. Existing prompt optimizers collapse these goals into a single score, and we find that this makes them stall: in most of their runs, 1000 rollouts yield zero progress over the seed skill. We introduce MOCHA (Multi-Objective CHebyshev Annealing), which selects skills to improve by Chebyshev scalarization and accepts improvements that expand the Pareto front, annealing from exploration to exploitation. Chebyshev scalarization scores a skill by its largest weighted shortfall from a perfect skill; with random weights, it can select any skill on the Pareto front for improvement, including trade-offs that an average would never favor. Across six diverse skills and two models, MOCHA escapes the seed in nearly every run, achieving 7.9% higher mean accuracy than the strongest baseline (up to 23.7% on DebugBench with GPT 5.5 and 14.9% on FEVER with Claude Haiku 4.5) while discovering Pareto fronts with the highest hypervolume and nearly twice as many Pareto-optimal skills.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent skill learning and evolution, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
- 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 571
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 542
13 more
- 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 366
- 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 309
- 2024Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programscited by 291
- 2024TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Textcited by 273
- 2020HoVer: A Dataset for Many-Hop Fact Extraction And Claim Verificationcited by 201
- 2023TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering datasetcited by 192
- 2020Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 179
- 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 148
- 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 124
- 2024DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2024Trace is the Next AutoDiff: Generative Optimization with Rich Feedback, Execution Traces, and LLMscited by 69
- 2024Smooth Tchebycheff Scalarization for Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 54
- 2024Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models Through Hypervolume Maximizationcited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026MOSCOPT: Mixture-of-Skills Collective Optimization for LLM Agents
- 2026Bilevel Optimization of Agent Skills via Monte Carlo Tree Search
- 2026GraphSkillEvo: Evolutionary Optimization of Graph-Structured Agent Skills
- 2026SkillAdam: Stable and Efficient Skill Evolution for Agents
- 2026SkillBrew: Multi-Objective Curation of Skill Banks for LLM Agents
- 2026Skills-Coach: A Self-Evolving Skill Optimizer via Training-Free GRPO
- 2026COBRA-Skills: Contextual Bandit-Guided Evolution for Agent Skill Optimization
- 2026MetaSkill-Evolve: Recursive Self-Improvement of LLM Agents via Two-Timescale Meta-Skill Evolution