mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

T-REG: Preference Optimization with Token-Level Reward Regularization

arXiv 2412.02685 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 13

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has been crucial in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values. Traditionally, RLHF involves generating responses to a query and using a reward model to assign a reward to the entire response. However, this approach faces challenges due to its reliance on a single, sparse reward, which makes it challenging for the model to identify which parts of the sequence contribute most significantly to the final reward. Recent methods have attempted to address this limitation by introducing token-level rewards. However, these methods often rely on either a trained credit assignment model or AI annotators, raising concerns about the quality and reliability of the rewards. In this paper, we propose token-level reward regularization (T-REG), a novel approach that leverages both sequence-level and token-level rewards for preference optimization. Harnessing the self-refinement capabilities of LLMs, our method uses contrastive prompting to enable LLMs to self-generate token-level rewards. These self-generated rewards then act as reward regularization, guiding the model to more effectively distribute sequence-level rewards across tokens. This facilitates better token-level credit assignment and enhances alignment performance. Experiments on the instruction following benchmarks, including Alpaca Eval 2 and Arena-Hard, show that our method consistently outperforms baseline methods by up to 3.8% and 4.4%, respectively. We will release the code and models at https://github.com/wzhouad/T-REG.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 38 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.

Builds on

38 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts18 Jun
  2. 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF29 Apr
  3. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling11 Jan
  4. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint18 Dec
  5. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training2 Jun
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  7. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback17 May
  8. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment13 Apr
  9. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
  10. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
  11. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 27

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  6. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  7. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
  8. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
  9. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  10. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  11. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  12. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
15 more
  1. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
  2. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
  3. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
  4. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
  5. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
  6. 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 256
  7. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
  8. 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearningcited by 236
  9. 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewardscited by 145
  10. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 133
  11. 2024WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimizationcited by 53
  12. 2024Improving Large Language Models via Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning with Minimum Editing Constraintcited by 39
  13. 2023Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignmentcited by 35
  14. 2024Selective Preference Optimization via Token-Level Reward Function Estimationcited by 25
  15. 2023Instructive Decoding: Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models are Self-Refiner from Noisy Instructionscited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMs
  2. 2024TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
  3. 2025Sentence-level Reward Model can Generalize Better for Aligning LLM from Human Preference
  4. 2024West-of-N: Synthetic Preferences for Self-Improving Reward Models
  5. 2024Sequence to Sequence Reward Modeling: Improving RLHF by Language Feedback
  6. 2025Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective
  7. 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularization
  8. 2025GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward Generalization