mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotations

arXiv 2110.12088 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 253

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing research on learning with noisy labels mainly focuses on synthetic label noise. Synthetic noise, though has clean structures which greatly enabled statistical analyses, often fails to model real-world noise patterns. The recent literature has observed several efforts to offer real-world noisy datasets, yet the existing efforts suffer from two caveats: (1) The lack of ground-truth verification makes it hard to theoretically study the property and treatment of real-world label noise; (2) These efforts are often of large scales, which may result in unfair comparisons of robust methods within reasonable and accessible computation power. To better understand real-world label noise, it is crucial to build controllable and moderate-sized real-world noisy datasets with both ground-truth and noisy labels. This work presents two new benchmark datasets CIFAR-10N, CIFAR-100N, equipping the training datasets of CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 with human-annotated real-world noisy labels we collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk. We quantitatively and qualitatively show that real-world noisy labels follow an instance-dependent pattern rather than the classically assumed and adopted ones (e.g., class-dependent label noise). We then initiate an effort to benchmarking a subset of the existing solutions using CIFAR-10N and CIFAR-100N. We further proceed to study the memorization of correct and wrong predictions, which further illustrates the difference between human noise and class-dependent synthetic noise. We show indeed the real-world noise patterns impose new and outstanding challenges as compared to synthetic label noise. These observations require us to rethink the treatment of noisy labels, and we hope the availability of these two datasets would facilitate the development and evaluation of future learning with noisy label solutions. Datasets and leaderboards are available at http://noisylabels.com.

Key facts. Cited by 253 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2021.

Builds on

37 of 56 references.

References · 37

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  3. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  5. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  6. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  7. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  8. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  9. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  10. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  11. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  12. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
25 more
  1. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  2. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  3. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  4. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  5. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  6. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  7. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  8. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  9. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  10. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  11. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  12. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
  13. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  14. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  15. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  16. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  17. 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
  18. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  19. 2019Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergencescited by 61
  20. 2020When Optimizing f-divergence is Robust with Label Noisecited by 44
  21. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  22. 2020Artificial Neural Variability for Deep Learning: On Overfitting, Noise Memorization, and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 28
  23. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  24. 2021Towards Good Practices for Efficiently Annotating Large-Scale Image Classification Datasetscited by 17
  25. 2020Policy Learning Using Weak Supervisioncited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 30; 2023: 60; 2024: 69; 2025: 64; 2026: 29.

253 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  2. 2024Benchmarking Uncertainty Disentanglement: Specialized Uncertainties for Specialized Taskscited by 78
  3. 2023Label-free Node Classification on Graphs with Large Language Models (LLMS)cited by 72
  4. 2024LLM Unlearning via Loss Adjustment with Only Forget Datacited by 71
  5. 2024Exponential Moving Average of Weights in Deep Learning: Dynamics and Benefitscited by 65
  6. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  7. 2022Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimationcited by 43
  8. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  9. 2025Exploring Criteria of Loss Reweighting to Enhance LLM Unlearningcited by 39
  10. 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
  11. 2024Measuring and Reducing LLM Hallucination without Gold-Standard Answerscited by 31
  12. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
38 more
  1. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
  2. 2023Understanding and Mitigating the Label Noise in Pre-training on Downstream Taskscited by 27
  3. 2025Recognition through Reasoning: Reinforcing Image Geo-localization with Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 27
  4. 2023Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language Modelscited by 26
  5. 2022Open-Sampling: Exploring Out-of-Distribution data for Re-balancing Long-tailed datasetscited by 25
  6. 2022Is the Performance of My Deep Network Too Good to Be True? A Direct Approach to Estimating the Bayes Error in Binary Classificationcited by 24
  7. 2025Early Stopping Against Label Noise Without Validation Datacited by 21
  8. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels by Efficient Transition Matrix Estimation to Combat Label Miscorrectioncited by 20
  9. 2023Robust Data Pruning under Label Noise via Maximizing Re-labeling Accuracycited by 20
  10. 2025HeurAgenix: Leveraging LLMs for Solving Complex Combinatorial Optimization Challengescited by 19
  11. 2024Experts Don't Cheat: Learning What You Don't Know By Predicting Pairscited by 18
  12. 2024Automatic Dataset Construction (ADC): Sample Collection, Data Curation, and Beyondcited by 18
  13. 2022Label-Noise Learning with Intrinsically Long-Tailed Datacited by 17
  14. 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
  15. 2023Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examplescited by 17
  16. 2025GUARD: Generation-time LLM Unlearning via Adaptive Restriction and Detectioncited by 17
  17. 2022Detecting Label Errors by using Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 16
  18. 2023BadLabel: A Robust Perspective on Evaluating and Enhancing Label-noise Learningcited by 16
  19. 2023AQuA: A Benchmarking Tool for Label Quality Assessmentcited by 16
  20. 2024Vision-Language Models are Strong Noisy Label Detectorscited by 16
  21. 2023Fine-Grained Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 15
  22. 2024Interpreting Predictive Probabilities: Model Confidence or Human Label Variation?cited by 15
  23. 2022Labeling Chaos to Learning Harmony: Federated Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 13
  24. 2023Learning Personalized Decision Support Policiescited by 13
  25. 2023Binary Classification with Confidence Differencecited by 13
  26. 2024The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic reviewcited by 13
  27. 2024A noisy elephant in the room: Is your out-of-distribution detector robust to label noise?cited by 13
  28. 2022Detecting Label Errors in Token Classification Datacited by 12
  29. 2023Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any modelcited by 12
  30. 2023CIFAR-10-Warehouse: Broad and More Realistic Testbeds in Model Generalization Analysiscited by 12
  31. 2024Split Conformal Prediction under Data Contaminationcited by 12
  32. 2023CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 11
  33. 2023Transferring Annotator- and Instance-dependent Transition Matrix for Learning from Crowdscited by 11
  34. 2024Tackling Noisy Clients in Federated Learning with End-to-end Label Correctioncited by 11
  35. 2025Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithmscited by 11
  36. 2022PADDLES: Phase-Amplitude Spectrum Disentangled Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  37. 2023When does Privileged Information Explain Away Label Noise?cited by 10
  38. 2023Mitigating Label Noise through Data Ambiguationcited by 10

50 most cited of 253 All 253 (JSON)