mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Embracing Biased Transition Matrices for Complementary-Label Learning with Many Classes

arXiv 2605.15586 ↗First posted 15 May 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Complementary-label learning (CLL) is a weakly supervised paradigm where instances are labeled with classes they do not belong to. Despite a decade of research, CLL methods remain competitive mainly on 10-class classification, with scaling to large label spaces continuing to be an enduring bottleneck. This limitation stems from the common assumption of uniform label generation in traditional methods, which fatally dilutes the learning signal in many-class settings. In this paper, we demonstrate that this long-standing barrier can be overcome by deliberately designing a biased (non-uniform) generation process that restricts complementary labels to a subset of classes. This finding motivates us to propose Bias-Induced Constrained Labeling (BICL), a principled framework spanning data collection to training that leverages this bias. BICL enables effective learning on CIFAR-100 and TinyImageNet-200, achieving more than sevenfold accuracy improvements over traditional methods. Our findings establish a new trajectory for making CLL feasible for many classes in real-world applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

Builds on

30 of 46 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  5. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  6. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  7. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  8. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  9. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  10. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  11. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  12. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
18 more
  1. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  2. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  3. 2020BYOL works even without batch statisticscited by 95
  4. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  5. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  6. 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
  7. 2019Learning with Multiple Complementary Labelscited by 53
  8. 2018Classification from Pairwise Similarity and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
  9. 2022SoLar: Sinkhorn Label Refinery for Imbalanced Partial-Label Learningcited by 31
  10. 2020Unbiased Risk Estimators Can Mislead: A Case Study of Learning with Complementary Labelscited by 29
  11. 2021Learning from Similarity-Confidence Datacited by 19
  12. 2023Binary Classification with Confidence Differencecited by 13
  13. 2023Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practicalcited by 10
  14. 2020Pairwise Supervision Can Provably Elicit a Decision Boundarycited by 9
  15. 2022Reduction from Complementary-Label Learning to Probability Estimatescited by 7
  16. 2022Class-Imbalanced Complementary-Label Learning via Weighted Losscited by 7
  17. 2023CLImage: Human-Annotated Datasets for Complementary-Label Learningcited by 7
  18. 2025Intra-Cluster Mixup: An Effective Data Augmentation Technique for Complementary-Label Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.