mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noise

arXiv 2011.00379 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2020cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 67

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work examines how to train fair classifiers in settings where training labels are corrupted with random noise, and where the error rates of corruption depend both on the label class and on the membership function for a protected subgroup. Heterogeneous label noise models systematic biases towards particular groups when generating annotations. We begin by presenting analytical results which show that naively imposing parity constraints on demographic disparity measures, without accounting for heterogeneous and group-dependent error rates, can decrease both the accuracy and the fairness of the resulting classifier. Our experiments demonstrate these issues arise in practice as well. We address these problems by performing empirical risk minimization with carefully defined surrogate loss functions and surrogate constraints that help avoid the pitfalls introduced by heterogeneous label noise. We provide both theoretical and empirical justifications for the efficacy of our methods. We view our results as an important example of how imposing fairness on biased data sets without proper care can do at least as much harm as it does good.

Key facts. Cited by 67 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 16; 2022: 16; 2023: 20; 2024: 7; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

67 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  2. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  3. 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
  4. 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
  5. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  6. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  7. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  8. 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
  9. 2021Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive Attributescited by 31
  10. 2021Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debuggingcited by 30
  11. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  12. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
38 more
  1. 2022Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness Constraintscited by 27
  2. 2023Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language Modelscited by 26
  3. 2023Ground(less) Truth: A Causal Framework for Proxy Labels in Human-Algorithm Decision-Makingcited by 25
  4. 2021Fair Classification with Adversarial Perturbationscited by 23
  5. 2021Fairness-Aware PAC Learning from Corrupted Datacited by 18
  6. 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
  7. 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 17
  8. 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
  9. 2023AQuA: A Benchmarking Tool for Label Quality Assessmentcited by 16
  10. 2023Uncertainty-based Fairness Measurescited by 15
  11. 2023Post-hoc Bias Scoring Is Optimal For Fair Classificationcited by 14
  12. 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
  13. 2022A Sandbox Tool to Bias(Stress)-Test Fairness Algorithmscited by 12
  14. 2023On (assessing) the fairness of risk score modelscited by 12
  15. 2024Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approachcited by 12
  16. 2025U-Fair: Uncertainty-based Multimodal Multitask Learning for Fairer Depression Detectioncited by 12
  17. 2023Counterfactual Prediction Under Outcome Measurement Errorcited by 10
  18. 2021Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approachcited by 9
  19. 2024Accuracy on the wrong line: On the pitfalls of noisy data for out-of-distribution generalisationcited by 9
  20. 2024Understanding Domain Generalization: A Noise Robustness Perspectivecited by 8
  21. 2024The Fragility of Fairness: Causal Sensitivity Analysis for Fair Machine Learningcited by 8
  22. 2022Understanding Unfairness in Fraud Detection through Model and Data Bias Interactionscited by 7
  23. 2022Disparate Censorship & Undertesting: A Source of Label Bias in Clinical Machine Learningcited by 7
  24. 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
  25. 2023Quantifying and mitigating the impact of label errors on model disparity metricscited by 7
  26. 2021Optimizing Black-box Metrics with Iterative Example Weightingcited by 6
  27. 2021Adaptive Data Debiasing through Bounded Explorationcited by 5
  28. 2022Social Bias Meets Data Bias: The Impacts of Labeling and Measurement Errors on Fairness Criteriacited by 5
  29. 2022Learning with Noisy Labels over Imbalanced Subpopulationscited by 5
  30. 2022FairRoad: Achieving Fairness for Recommender Systems with Optimized Antidote Datacited by 5
  31. 2023Fairness and Sequential Decision Making: Limits, Lessons, and Opportunitiescited by 5
  32. 2023Fairness Improves Learning from Noisily Labeled Long-Tailed Datacited by 5
  33. 2023How Far Can Fairness Constraints Help Recover From Biased Data?cited by 5
  34. 2022Prisoners of Their Own Devices: How Models Induce Data Bias in Performative Predictioncited by 4
  35. 2023Leveraging an Alignment Set in Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 4
  36. 2024From Biased Selective Labels to Pseudo-Labels: An Expectation-Maximization Framework for Learning from Biased Decisionscited by 4
  37. 2023Mitigating Source Bias for Fairer Weak Supervisioncited by 3
  38. 2022A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environmentscited by 2

50 most cited of 67 All 67 (JSON)