mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When VLMs Meet Image Classification: Test Sets Renovation via Missing Label Identification

arXiv 2505.16149 ↗First posted 22 May 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Image classification benchmark datasets such as CIFAR, MNIST, and ImageNet serve as critical tools for model evaluation. However, despite the cleaning efforts, these datasets still suffer from pervasive noisy labels and often contain missing labels due to the co-existing image pattern where multiple classes appear in an image sample. This results in misleading model comparisons and unfair evaluations. Existing label cleaning methods focus primarily on noisy labels, but the issue of missing labels remains largely overlooked. Motivated by these challenges, we present a comprehensive framework named REVEAL, integrating state-of-the-art pre-trained vision-language models (e.g., LLaVA, BLIP, Janus, Qwen) with advanced machine/human label curation methods (e.g., Docta, Cleanlab, MTurk), to systematically address both noisy labels and missing label detection in widely-used image classification test sets. REVEAL detects potential noisy labels and omissions, aggregates predictions from various methods, and refines label accuracy through confidence-informed predictions and consensus-based filtering. Additionally, we provide a thorough analysis of state-of-the-art vision-language models and pre-trained image classifiers, highlighting their strengths and limitations within the context of dataset renovation by revealing 10 observations. Our method effectively reveals missing labels from public datasets and provides soft-labeled results with likelihoods. Through human verifications, REVEAL significantly improves the quality of 6 benchmark test sets, highly aligning to human judgments and enabling more accurate and meaningful comparisons in image classification.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 45 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

Builds on

45 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Vision-Language Models are Strong Noisy Label Detectors29 Sep
  2. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar

Other references · 43

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  3. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  4. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  5. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  6. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  7. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,876
  8. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  9. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  10. 2025Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scalingcited by 812
  11. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 627
  12. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 577
31 more
  1. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  2. 2024Janus: Decoupling Visual Encoding for Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generationcited by 457
  3. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  4. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  5. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  6. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  7. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  8. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  9. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  10. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  11. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  12. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  13. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  14. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
  15. 2019Learning a Deep ConvNet for Multi-label Classification with Partial Labelscited by 124
  16. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  17. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  18. 2019Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergencescited by 61
  19. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 59
  20. 2020When Optimizing f-divergence is Robust with Label Noisecited by 44
  21. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  22. 2023Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language Modelscited by 26
  23. 2021Multi-label Classification with Partial Annotations using Class-aware Selective Losscited by 25
  24. 2024Automatic Dataset Construction (ADC): Sample Collection, Data Curation, and Beyondcited by 18
  25. 2023Learning in Imperfect Environment: Multi-Label Classification with Long-Tailed Distribution and Partial Labelscited by 17
  26. 2023Distributionally Robust Post-hoc Classifiers under Prior Shiftscited by 16
  27. 2020Policy Learning Using Weak Supervisioncited by 13
  28. 2021Constrained Instance and Class Reweighting for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 12
  29. 2023Human and AI Perceptual Differences in Image Classification Errorscited by 9
  30. 2023Fairness Improves Learning from Noisily Labeled Long-Tailed Datacited by 5
  31. 2022Label Structure Preserving Contrastive Embedding for Multi-Label Learning with Missing Labelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Doomed to Re-Annotate, Forever: The ImageNet Story
  2. 2023Vision-language Assisted Attribute Learning
  3. 2025Human-Corrected Labels Learning: Enhancing Labels Quality via Human Correction of VLMs Discrepancies
  4. 2024Improving Multi-label Recognition using Class Co-Occurrence Probabilities
  5. 2025Bridging Weakly-Supervised Learning and VLM Distillation: Noisy Partial Label Learning for Efficient Downstream Adaptation
  6. 2025No Labels Needed: Zero-Shot Image Classification with Collaborative Self-Learning
  7. 2025Auto-Labeling Data for Object Detection
  8. 2026Adapting Vision-Language Models from Iconic to Inclusive for Multi-Label Recognition Without Labels