mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mitigating Label Noise through Data Ambiguation

arXiv 2305.13764 ↗First posted 23 May 2023cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Label noise poses an important challenge in machine learning, especially in deep learning, in which large models with high expressive power dominate the field. Models of that kind are prone to memorizing incorrect labels, thereby harming generalization performance. Many methods have been proposed to address this problem, including robust loss functions and more complex label correction approaches. Robust loss functions are appealing due to their simplicity, but typically lack flexibility, while label correction usually adds substantial complexity to the training setup. In this paper, we suggest to address the shortcomings of both methodologies by "ambiguating" the target information, adding additional, complementary candidate labels in case the learner is not sufficiently convinced of the observed training label. More precisely, we leverage the framework of so-called superset learning to construct set-valued targets based on a confidence threshold, which deliver imprecise yet more reliable beliefs about the ground-truth, effectively helping the learner to suppress the memorization effect. In an extensive empirical evaluation, our method demonstrates favorable learning behavior on synthetic and real-world noise, confirming the effectiveness in detecting and correcting erroneous training labels.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.

Builds on

48 of 68 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  5. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  6. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  7. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  8. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  9. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  10. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  11. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  12. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
36 more
  1. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  2. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  3. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  4. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  5. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  6. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  7. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  8. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  9. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  10. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  11. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  12. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  13. 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
  14. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  15. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  16. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  17. 2020Learning Diverse and Discriminative Representations via the Principle of Maximal Coding Rate Reductioncited by 142
  18. 2016Deep Label Distribution Learning with Label Ambiguitycited by 104
  19. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  20. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  21. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  22. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  23. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  24. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  25. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  26. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  27. 2020When Optimizing f-divergence is Robust with Label Noisecited by 44
  28. 2020Learning to Purify Noisy Labels via Meta Soft Label Correctorcited by 39
  29. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 39
  30. 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
  31. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
  32. 2022SELC: Self-Ensemble Label Correction Improves Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 24
  33. 2023Learning from Noisy Labels with Decoupled Meta Label Purifiercited by 21
  34. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels by Efficient Transition Matrix Estimation to Combat Label Miscorrectioncited by 20
  35. 2021Sample Prior Guided Robust Model Learning to Suppress Noisy Labelscited by 8
  36. 2022Blessing of Nonconvexity in Deep Linear Models: Depth Flattens the Optimization Landscape Around the True Solutioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

10 papers.