mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Features

arXiv 2202.01273 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The label noise transition matrix, denoting the transition probabilities from clean labels to noisy labels, is crucial for designing statistically robust solutions. Existing estimators for noise transition matrices, e.g., using either anchor points or clusterability, focus on computer vision tasks that are relatively easier to obtain high-quality representations. We observe that tasks with lower-quality features fail to meet the anchor-point or clusterability condition, due to the coexistence of both uninformative and informative representations. To handle this issue, we propose a generic and practical information-theoretic approach to down-weight the less informative parts of the lower-quality features. This improvement is crucial to identifying and estimating the label noise transition matrix. The salient technical challenge is to compute the relevant information-theoretical metrics using only noisy labels instead of clean ones. We prove that the celebrated f-mutual information measure can often preserve the order when calculated using noisy labels. We then build our transition matrix estimator using this distilled version of features. The necessity and effectiveness of the proposed method are also demonstrated by evaluating the estimation error on a varied set of tabular data and text classification tasks with lower-quality features. Code is available at github.com/UCSC-REAL/BeyondImages.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2022.

Builds on

34 of 68 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  5. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  7. 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
  8. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  9. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  10. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  11. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  12. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
22 more
  1. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  2. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  3. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  4. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  5. 2020A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Futurecited by 121
  6. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  7. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  8. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  9. 2015A Review of Feature Selection Methods Based on Mutual Informationcited by 67
  10. 2020Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noisecited by 67
  11. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  12. 2014Spectral Methods meet EM: A Provably Optimal Algorithm for Crowdsourcingcited by 63
  13. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
  14. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  15. 2020When Optimizing f-divergence is Robust with Label Noisecited by 44
  16. 2019Noise-tolerant fair classificationcited by 40
  17. 2021Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Informationcited by 33
  18. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  19. 2021Understanding Instance-Level Label Noise: Disparate Impacts and Treatmentscited by 22
  20. 2020Policy Learning Using Weak Supervisioncited by 13
  21. 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
  22. 2021Alleviating Noisy-label Effects in Image Classification via Probability Transition Matrixcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 8; 2024: 9; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024LLM Unlearning via Loss Adjustment with Only Forget Datacited by 71
  2. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  3. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  4. 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
  5. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  6. 2023Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language Modelscited by 26
  7. 2024Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating Systemscited by 26
  8. 2022Open-Sampling: Exploring Out-of-Distribution data for Re-balancing Long-tailed datasetscited by 25
  9. 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
  10. 2023Deep Learning From Crowdsourced Labels: Coupled Cross-entropy Minimization, Identifiability, and Regularizationcited by 12
  11. 2024Split Conformal Prediction under Data Contaminationcited by 12
  12. 2024Dissecting Sample Hardness: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Hardness Characterization Methods for Data-Centric AIcited by 11
15 more
  1. 2023Mitigating Label Noise through Data Ambiguationcited by 10
  2. 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustnesscited by 10
  3. 2023Dynamics-Aware Loss for Learning with Label Noisecited by 8
  4. 2023The Importance of Human-Labeled Data in the Era of LLMscited by 8
  5. 2024Skeleton-Based Human Action Recognition with Noisy Labelscited by 8
  6. 2024FedFixer: Mitigating Heterogeneous Label Noise in Federated Learningcited by 8
  7. 2024Mitigating Label Noise using Prompt-Based Hyperbolic Meta-Learning in Open-Set Domain Generalizationcited by 6
  8. 2023Fairness Improves Learning from Noisily Labeled Long-Tailed Datacited by 5
  9. 2023Leveraging an Alignment Set in Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 4
  10. 2025Exploring the Noise Robustness of Online Conformal Predictioncited by 4
  11. 2025Sample Selection via Contrastive Fragmentation for Noisy Label Regressioncited by 4
  12. 2024Robust Learning under Hybrid Noisecited by 1
  13. 2025EReLiFM: Evidential Reliability-Aware Residual Flow Meta-Learning for Open-Set Domain Generalization under Noisy Labelscited by 1
  14. 2023Hypothesis Testing for Class-Conditional Noise Using Local Maximum Likelihoodcited by 0
  15. 2026SLT: Robust Quantum Neural Networks for Noisy-Label Medical Image Classification via Supermartingale-based Label Transitioncited by 0