mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transferring Annotator- and Instance-dependent Transition Matrix for Learning from Crowds

arXiv 2306.03116 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2023cs.HC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from crowds describes that the annotations of training data are obtained with crowd-sourcing services. Multiple annotators each complete their own small part of the annotations, where labeling mistakes that depend on annotators occur frequently. Modeling the label-noise generation process by the noise transition matrix is a power tool to tackle the label noise. In real-world crowd-sourcing scenarios, noise transition matrices are both annotator- and instance-dependent. However, due to the high complexity of annotator- and instance-dependent transition matrices (AIDTM), annotation sparsity, which means each annotator only labels a little part of instances, makes modeling AIDTM very challenging. Prior works simplify the problem by assuming the transition matrix is instance-independent or using simple parametric ways, which lose modeling generality. Motivated by this, we target a more realistic problem, estimating general AIDTM in practice. Without losing modeling generality, we parameterize AIDTM with deep neural networks. To alleviate the modeling challenge, we suppose every annotator shares its noise pattern with similar annotators, and estimate AIDTM via knowledge transfer. We hence first model the mixture of noise patterns by all annotators, and then transfer this modeling to individual annotators. Furthermore, considering that the transfer from the mixture of noise patterns to individuals may cause two annotators with highly different noise generations to perturb each other, we employ the knowledge transfer between identified neighboring annotators to calibrate the modeling. Theoretical analyses are derived to demonstrate that both the knowledge transfer from global to individuals and the knowledge transfer between neighboring individuals can help model general AIDTM. Experiments confirm the superiority of the proposed approach on synthetic and real-world crowd-sourcing data.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 122 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.

Builds on

48 of 122 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  5. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  6. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,547
  7. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,301
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  9. 2022Diffusion Models in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,015
  10. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  11. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 950
  12. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
36 more
  1. 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 654
  2. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  3. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
  4. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 372
  5. 2019Multi-Label Image Recognition with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 322
  6. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 290
  7. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  8. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  9. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
  10. 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  11. 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
  12. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  13. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  14. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  15. 2020Disentangling Human Error from the Ground Truth in Segmentation of Medical Imagescited by 58
  16. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  17. 2017Learning the Structure of Generative Models without Labeled Datacited by 50
  18. 2017Learning From Noisy Singly-labeled Datacited by 50
  19. 2021Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning under a Structural Causal Modelcited by 50
  20. 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
  21. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  22. 2020Learning from Crowds by Modeling Common Confusionscited by 32
  23. 2021Estimating Instance-dependent Bayes-label Transition Matrix using a Deep Neural Networkcited by 30
  24. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  25. 2019Max-MIG: an Information Theoretic Approach for Joint Learning from Crowdscited by 26
  26. 2014Error Rate Bounds and Iterative Weighted Majority Voting for Crowdsourcingcited by 21
  27. 2020Adversarial Crowdsourcing Through Robust Rank-One Matrix Completioncited by 21
  28. 2019Wasserstein Adversarial Regularization (WAR) on label noisecited by 16
  29. 2022Learning Hyper Label Model for Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 16
  30. 2022Trustable Co-label Learning from Multiple Noisy Annotatorscited by 12
  31. 2022Knowledge Learning with Crowdsourcing: A Brief Review and Systematic Perspectivecited by 11
  32. 2022Learning from Multiple Annotator Noisy Labels via Sample-wise Label Fusioncited by 10
  33. 2020Efficient PAC Learning from the Crowd with Pairwise Comparisonscited by 7
  34. 2021Wisdom of the Crowd Voting: Truthful Aggregation of Voter Information and Preferencescited by 7
  35. 2018Millionaire: A Hint-guided Approach for Crowdsourcingcited by 2
  36. 2019Deep Robust Subjective Visual Property Prediction in Crowdsourcingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

11 papers.