mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey of Label-noise Representation Learning: Past, Present and Future

arXiv 2011.04406 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2020cs.LGcited by 121

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classical machine learning implicitly assumes that labels of the training data are sampled from a clean distribution, which can be too restrictive for real-world scenarios. However, statistical-learning-based methods may not train deep learning models robustly with these noisy labels. Therefore, it is urgent to design Label-Noise Representation Learning (LNRL) methods for robustly training deep models with noisy labels. To fully understand LNRL, we conduct a survey study. We first clarify a formal definition for LNRL from the perspective of machine learning. Then, via the lens of learning theory and empirical study, we figure out why noisy labels affect deep models' performance. Based on the theoretical guidance, we categorize different LNRL methods into three directions. Under this unified taxonomy, we provide a thorough discussion of the pros and cons of different categories. More importantly, we summarize the essential components of robust LNRL, which can spark new directions. Lastly, we propose possible research directions within LNRL, such as new datasets, instance-dependent LNRL, and adversarial LNRL. We also envision potential directions beyond LNRL, such as learning with feature-noise, preference-noise, domain-noise, similarity-noise, graph-noise and demonstration-noise.

Key facts. Cited by 121 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 20; 2022: 35; 2023: 20; 2024: 27; 2025: 10; 2026: 9.

121 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  2. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  3. 2021MultiWOZ 2.4: A Multi-Domain Task-Oriented Dialogue Dataset with Essential Annotation Corrections to Improve State Tracking Evaluationcited by 86
  4. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  5. 2022Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeabilitycited by 62
  6. 2022FedCorr: Multi-Stage Federated Learning for Label Noise Correctioncited by 61
  7. 2022Will Large-scale Generative Models Corrupt Future Datasets?cited by 59
  8. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  9. 2022DrugOOD: Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Dataset Curator and Benchmark for AI-aided Drug Discovery -- A Focus on Affinity Prediction Problems with Noise Annotationscited by 54
  10. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  11. 2021Automatic Sleep Staging of EEG Signals: Recent Development, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 41
  12. 2024Impact of Preference Noise on the Alignment Performance of Generative Language Modelscited by 41
38 more
  1. 2022Calibrated One-class Classification for Unsupervised Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 39
  2. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
  3. 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Black-Box Source Modelscited by 32
  4. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  5. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
  6. 2021Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels via Regularization between Representationscited by 26
  7. 2022CMW-Net: Learning a Class-Aware Sample Weighting Mapping for Robust Deep Learningcited by 24
  8. 2021RIM: Reliable Influence-based Active Learning on Graphscited by 23
  9. 2022PiCO+: Contrastive Label Disambiguation for Robust Partial Label Learningcited by 21
  10. 2025Early Stopping Against Label Noise Without Validation Datacited by 21
  11. 2021On the Robustness of Average Losses for Partial-Label Learningcited by 20
  12. 2021Noise-robust Graph Learning by Estimating and Leveraging Pairwise Interactionscited by 20
  13. 2023A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptionscited by 20
  14. 2021Learning From Long-Tailed Data With Noisy Labelscited by 17
  15. 2022Label-Noise Learning with Intrinsically Long-Tailed Datacited by 17
  16. 2023Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examplescited by 17
  17. 2024A Review of Pseudo-Labeling for Computer Visioncited by 16
  18. 2024Vision-Language Models are Strong Noisy Label Detectorscited by 16
  19. 2022ADMoE: Anomaly Detection with Mixture-of-Experts from Noisy Labelscited by 15
  20. 2022On the Power-Law Hessian Spectrums in Deep Learningcited by 14
  21. 2021SSR: An Efficient and Robust Framework for Learning with Unknown Label Noisecited by 13
  22. 2022On the Overlooked Structure of Stochastic Gradientscited by 13
  23. 2021Constrained Instance and Class Reweighting for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 12
  24. 2021Rethinking Importance Weighting for Transfer Learningcited by 11
  25. 2022ASSIST: Towards Label Noise-Robust Dialogue State Trackingcited by 11
  26. 2022Losses over Labels: Weakly Supervised Learning via Direct Loss Constructioncited by 11
  27. 2023Weakly Supervised AUC Optimization: A Unified Partial AUC Approachcited by 11
  28. 2024Dissecting Sample Hardness: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Hardness Characterization Methods for Data-Centric AIcited by 11
  29. 2024Tackling Noisy Clients in Federated Learning with End-to-end Label Correctioncited by 11
  30. 2021Estimating the electrical power output of industrial devices with end-to-end time-series classification in the presence of label noisecited by 10
  31. 2023Counterfactual Prediction Under Outcome Measurement Errorcited by 10
  32. 2024KADEL: Knowledge-Aware Denoising Learning for Commit Message Generationcited by 10
  33. 2022Production federated keyword spotting via distillation, filtering, and joint federated-centralized trainingcited by 9
  34. 2022Towards Confident Detection of Prostate Cancer using High Resolution Micro-ultrasoundcited by 9
  35. 2023Latent Class-Conditional Noise Modelcited by 9
  36. 2024Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Modelscited by 9
  37. 2024AIM: Attributing, Interpreting, Mitigating Data Unfairnesscited by 9
  38. 2023Benchmarking the Reliability of Post-training Quantization: a Particular Focus on Worst-case Performancecited by 8

50 most cited of 121 All 121 (JSON)