mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Rates

arXiv 1910.03231 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 142

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning with noisy labels is a common challenge in supervised learning. Existing approaches often require practitioners to specify noise rates, i.e., a set of parameters controlling the severity of label noises in the problem, and the specifications are either assumed to be given or estimated using additional steps. In this work, we introduce a new family of loss functions that we name as peer loss functions, which enables learning from noisy labels and does not require a priori specification of the noise rates. Peer loss functions work within the standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework. We show that, under mild conditions, performing ERM with peer loss functions on the noisy dataset leads to the optimal or a near-optimal classifier as if performing ERM over the clean training data, which we do not have access to. We pair our results with an extensive set of experiments. Peer loss provides a way to simplify model development when facing potentially noisy training labels, and can be promoted as a robust candidate loss function in such situations.

Key facts. Cited by 142 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 31; 2022: 25; 2023: 33; 2024: 28; 2025: 16; 2026: 9.

142 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  2. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  3. 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
  4. 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
  5. 2024LLM Unlearning via Loss Adjustment with Only Forget Datacited by 71
  6. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  7. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  8. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  9. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  10. 2022Self-Guided Noise-Free Data Generation for Efficient Zero-Shot Learningcited by 49
  11. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  12. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
38 more
  1. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  2. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  3. 2025Exploring Criteria of Loss Reweighting to Enhance LLM Unlearningcited by 39
  4. 2021TransFGU: A Top-down Approach to Fine-Grained Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 38
  5. 2021Contrastive Learning Improves Model Robustness Under Label Noisecited by 36
  6. 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalizationcited by 33
  7. 2024Measuring and Reducing LLM Hallucination without Gold-Standard Answerscited by 31
  8. 2021Estimating Instance-dependent Bayes-label Transition Matrix using a Deep Neural Networkcited by 30
  9. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  10. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  11. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
  12. 2021Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels via Regularization between Representationscited by 26
  13. 2021Understanding Instance-Level Label Noise: Disparate Impacts and Treatmentscited by 22
  14. 2023WBCAtt: A White Blood Cell Dataset Annotated with Detailed Morphological Attributescited by 22
  15. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels by Efficient Transition Matrix Estimation to Combat Label Miscorrectioncited by 20
  16. 2021Understanding the Interaction of Adversarial Training with Noisy Labelscited by 19
  17. 2021A Tale Of Two Long Tailscited by 19
  18. 2022Identifying Hard Noise in Long-Tailed Sample Distributioncited by 19
  19. 2021Consistency Regularization Can Improve Robustness to Label Noisecited by 18
  20. 2024Enhanced H-Consistency Boundscited by 18
  21. 2024Automatic Dataset Construction (ADC): Sample Collection, Data Curation, and Beyondcited by 18
  22. 2022Instance-Dependent Noisy Label Learning via Graphical Modellingcited by 17
  23. 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
  24. 2023Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examplescited by 17
  25. 2024RobustTSF: Towards Theory and Design of Robust Time Series Forecasting with Anomaliescited by 17
  26. 2021Exponentiated Gradient Reweighting for Robust Training Under Label Noise and Beyondcited by 16
  27. 2022Detecting Label Errors by using Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 16
  28. 2022Centrality and Consistency: Two-Stage Clean Samples Identification for Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labelscited by 16
  29. 2023BadLabel: A Robust Perspective on Evaluating and Enhancing Label-noise Learningcited by 16
  30. 2023Learning to Segment from Noisy Annotations: A Spatial Correction Approachcited by 16
  31. 2024ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Modelscited by 16
  32. 2023Fine-Grained Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 15
  33. 2023ReSup: Reliable Label Noise Suppression for Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 14
  34. 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
  35. 2021Constrained Instance and Class Reweighting for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 12
  36. 2021Being Properly Impropercited by 11
  37. 2022Learning from data in the mixed adversarial non-adversarial case: Finding the helpers and ignoring the trollscited by 11
  38. 2022PADDLES: Phase-Amplitude Spectrum Disentangled Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 10

50 most cited of 142 All 142 (JSON)