mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise

arXiv 2012.11854 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.AIcited by 90

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The presence of label noise often misleads the training of deep neural networks. Departing from the recent literature which largely assumes the label noise rate is only determined by the true label class, the errors in human-annotated labels are more likely to be dependent on the difficulty levels of tasks, resulting in settings with instance-dependent label noise. We first provide evidences that the heterogeneous instance-dependent label noise is effectively down-weighting the examples with higher noise rates in a non-uniform way and thus causes imbalances, rendering the strategy of directly applying methods for class-dependent label noise questionable. Built on a recent work peer loss [24], we then propose and study the potentials of a second-order approach that leverages the estimation of several covariance terms defined between the instance-dependent noise rates and the Bayes optimal label. We show that this set of second-order statistics successfully captures the induced imbalances. We further proceed to show that with the help of the estimated second-order statistics, we identify a new loss function whose expected risk of a classifier under instance-dependent label noise is equivalent to a new problem with only class-dependent label noise. This fact allows us to apply existing solutions to handle this better-studied setting. We provide an efficient procedure to estimate these second-order statistics without accessing either ground truth labels or prior knowledge of the noise rates. Experiments on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 with synthetic instance-dependent label noise and Clothing1M with real-world human label noise verify our approach. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/CAL.

Key facts. Cited by 90 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 20; 2022: 22; 2023: 25; 2024: 12; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

90 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  2. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  3. 2021Open-Vocabulary Instance Segmentation via Robust Cross-Modal Pseudo-Labelingcited by 84
  4. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  5. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  6. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  7. 2021Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning under a Structural Causal Modelcited by 50
  8. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  9. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  10. 2023When Source-Free Domain Adaptation Meets Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  11. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  12. 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
38 more
  1. 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
  2. 2021Estimating Instance-dependent Bayes-label Transition Matrix using a Deep Neural Networkcited by 30
  3. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  4. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  5. 2022Beyond Images: Label Noise Transition Matrix Estimation for Tasks with Lower-Quality Featurescited by 27
  6. 2021Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels via Regularization between Representationscited by 26
  7. 2023Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language Modelscited by 26
  8. 2022Open-Sampling: Exploring Out-of-Distribution data for Re-balancing Long-tailed datasetscited by 25
  9. 2021Understanding Instance-Level Label Noise: Disparate Impacts and Treatmentscited by 22
  10. 2023Learning on Graphs under Label Noisecited by 22
  11. 2021Adaptive Sample Selection for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 20
  12. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels by Efficient Transition Matrix Estimation to Combat Label Miscorrectioncited by 20
  13. 2022SimT: Handling Open-set Noise for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 17
  14. 2022Instance-Dependent Noisy Label Learning via Graphical Modellingcited by 17
  15. 2022Weak Proxies are Sufficient and Preferable for Fairness with Missing Sensitive Attributescited by 17
  16. 2024RobustTSF: Towards Theory and Design of Robust Time Series Forecasting with Anomaliescited by 17
  17. 2022Centrality and Consistency: Two-Stage Clean Samples Identification for Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labelscited by 16
  18. 2023Distributionally Robust Post-hoc Classifiers under Prior Shiftscited by 16
  19. 2021An Instance-Dependent Simulation Framework for Learning with Label Noisecited by 14
  20. 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
  21. 2021Learning to Rectify for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 12
  22. 2022Trustable Co-label Learning from Multiple Noisy Annotatorscited by 12
  23. 2024Cost-Sensitive Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts with Workload Constraintscited by 12
  24. 2023Transferring Annotator- and Instance-dependent Transition Matrix for Learning from Crowdscited by 11
  25. 2022L2B: Learning to Bootstrap Robust Models for Combating Label Noisecited by 10
  26. 2022PADDLES: Phase-Amplitude Spectrum Disentangled Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  27. 2022Blind Knowledge Distillation for Robust Image Classificationcited by 9
  28. 2021Sample Prior Guided Robust Model Learning to Suppress Noisy Labelscited by 8
  29. 2023The Importance of Human-Labeled Data in the Era of LLMscited by 8
  30. 2023Regularly Truncated M-estimators for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 8
  31. 2023Regroup Median Loss for Combating Label Noisecited by 8
  32. 2024Skeleton-Based Human Action Recognition with Noisy Labelscited by 8
  33. 2024Tackling Noisy Labels with Network Parameter Additive Decompositioncited by 8
  34. 2024FedFixer: Mitigating Heterogeneous Label Noise in Federated Learningcited by 8
  35. 2024Label Noise: Ignorance Is Blisscited by 8
  36. 2023GraphCleaner: Detecting Mislabelled Samples in Popular Graph Learning Benchmarkscited by 7
  37. 2021An Empirical Study and Analysis on Open-Set Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 6
  38. 2021Learning from Noisy Labels via Dynamic Loss Thresholdingcited by 6

50 most cited of 90 All 90 (JSON)