mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2106.15853 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2021cs.LGcited by 112

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The memorization effect of deep neural network (DNN) plays a pivotal role in many state-of-the-art label-noise learning methods. To exploit this property, the early stopping trick, which stops the optimization at the early stage of training, is usually adopted. Current methods generally decide the early stopping point by considering a DNN as a whole. However, a DNN can be considered as a composition of a series of layers, and we find that the latter layers in a DNN are much more sensitive to label noise, while their former counterparts are quite robust. Therefore, selecting a stopping point for the whole network may make different DNN layers antagonistically affected each other, thus degrading the final performance. In this paper, we propose to separate a DNN into different parts and progressively train them to address this problem. Instead of the early stopping, which trains a whole DNN all at once, we initially train former DNN layers by optimizing the DNN with a relatively large number of epochs. During training, we progressively train the latter DNN layers by using a smaller number of epochs with the preceding layers fixed to counteract the impact of noisy labels. We term the proposed method as progressive early stopping (PES). Despite its simplicity, compared with the early stopping, PES can help to obtain more promising and stable results. Furthermore, by combining PES with existing approaches on noisy label training, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on image classification benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 112 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2021.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  6. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  7. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  9. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  10. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  11. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  12. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
16 more
  1. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  2. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  3. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  4. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  5. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  6. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  7. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  8. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  9. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  10. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  11. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  12. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  13. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  14. 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
  15. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  16. 2020Class2Simi: A Noise Reduction Perspective on Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 20; 2023: 27; 2024: 29; 2025: 24; 2026: 9.

112 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  2. 2023Label-free Node Classification on Graphs with Large Language Models (LLMS)cited by 72
  3. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  4. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  5. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  6. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  7. 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalizationcited by 33
  8. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  9. 2023From Shortcuts to Triggers: Backdoor Defense with Denoised PoEcited by 26
  10. 2025Early Stopping Against Label Noise Without Validation Datacited by 21
  11. 2023FlatMatch: Bridging Labeled Data and Unlabeled Data with Cross-Sharpness for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 20
  12. 2024DELT: A Simple Diversity-driven EarlyLate Training for Dataset Distillationcited by 20
38 more
  1. 2023On the Over-Memorization During Natural, Robust and Catastrophic Overfittingcited by 19
  2. 2023Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examplescited by 17
  3. 2023FedA3I: Annotation Quality-Aware Aggregation for Federated Medical Image Segmentation against Heterogeneous Annotation Noisecited by 14
  4. 2022Two Decades of Bengali Handwritten Digit Recognition: A Surveycited by 13
  5. 2022Labeling Chaos to Learning Harmony: Federated Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 13
  6. 2023InstanT: Semi-supervised Learning with Instance-dependent Thresholdscited by 13
  7. 2022FedNoiL: A Simple Two-Level Sampling Method for Federated Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 12
  8. 2023Toward Robustness in Multi-label Classification: A Data Augmentation Strategy against Imbalance and Noisecited by 11
  9. 2022PADDLES: Phase-Amplitude Spectrum Disentangled Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  10. 2023When does Privileged Information Explain Away Label Noise?cited by 10
  11. 2022Blind Knowledge Distillation for Robust Image Classificationcited by 9
  12. 2023Latent Class-Conditional Noise Modelcited by 9
  13. 2023Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurationscited by 9
  14. 2024Foster Adaptivity and Balance in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 9
  15. 2023Regroup Median Loss for Combating Label Noisecited by 8
  16. 2024Noisy Label Processing for Classification: A Surveycited by 8
  17. 2022Bootstrapping the Relationship Between Images and Their Clean and Noisy Labelscited by 7
  18. 2024A Layer Selection Approach to Test Time Adaptationcited by 7
  19. 2022Label Noise-Robust Learning using a Confidence-Based Sieving Strategycited by 6
  20. 2022Adversarial Auto-Augment with Label Preservation: A Representation Learning Principle Guided Approachcited by 6
  21. 2023Random Smoothing Regularization in Kernel Gradient Descent Learningcited by 6
  22. 2024Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selectioncited by 6
  23. 2025ε-Softmax: Approximating One-Hot Vectors for Mitigating Label Noisecited by 6
  24. 2022SplitNet: Learnable Clean-Noisy Label Splitting for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 5
  25. 2023Unleashing the Potential of Regularization Strategies in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 5
  26. 2023Noisy Pair Corrector for Dense Retrievalcited by 5
  27. 2024PLReMix: Combating Noisy Labels with Pseudo-Label Relaxed Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 5
  28. 2025SelectMix: Enhancing Label Noise Robustness through Targeted Sample Mixingcited by 5
  29. 2026Reclaiming Lost Text Layers for Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 5
  30. 2024Learning with Noisy Labels: Interconnection of Two Expectation-Maximizationscited by 4
  31. 2024Stochastic Resetting Mitigates Latent Gradient Bias of SGD from Label Noisecited by 4
  32. 2025Imbalanced Medical Image Segmentation with Pixel-dependent Noisy Labelscited by 4
  33. 2025Enhancing Sample Selection Against Label Noise by Cutting Mislabeled Easy Examplescited by 4
  34. 2025Sample Selection via Contrastive Fragmentation for Noisy Label Regressioncited by 4
  35. 2025On the Role of Label Noise in the Feature Learning Processcited by 4
  36. 2025Delving into Instance-Dependent Label Noise in Graph Data: A Comprehensive Study and Benchmarkcited by 4
  37. 2022Towards Data-Algorithm Dependent Generalization: a Case Study on Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 3
  38. 2023Unreliable Partial Label Learning with Recursive Separationcited by 3

50 most cited of 112 All 112 (JSON)