Beyond Loss Values: Robust Dynamic Pruning via Loss Trajectory Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing dynamic data pruning methods often fail under noisy-label settings, as they typically rely on per-sample loss as the ranking criterion. This could mistakenly lead to preserving noisy samples due to their high loss values, resulting in significant performance drop. To address this, we propose AlignPrune, a noise-robust module designed to enhance the reliability of dynamic pruning under label noise. Specifically, AlignPrune introduces the Dynamic Alignment Score (DAS), which is a loss-trajectory-based criterion that enables more accurate identification of noisy samples, thereby improving pruning effectiveness. As a simple yet effective plug-and-play module, AlignPrune can be seamlessly integrated into state-of-the-art dynamic pruning frameworks, consistently outperforming them without modifying either the model architecture or the training pipeline. Extensive experiments on five widely-used benchmarks across various noise types and pruning ratios demonstrate the effectiveness of AlignPrune, boosting accuracy by up to 6.3% over state-of-the-art baselines. Our results offer a generalizable solution for pruning under noisy data, encouraging further exploration of learning in real-world scenarios. Code is available at: https://github.com/leonqin430/AlignPrune.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.
Builds on
55 of 67 references.
References · 55
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 671
38 more
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 146
- 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
- 2022Coverage-centric Coreset Selection for High Pruning Ratescited by 115
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
- 2020Submodular Combinatorial Information Measures with Applications in Machine Learningcited by 88
- 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
- 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
- 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
- 2025Scaling Language-Free Visual Representation Learningcited by 62
- 2021Accelerating Deep Learning with Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 43
- 2023Spanning Training Progress: Temporal Dual-Depth Scoring (TDDS) for Enhanced Dataset Pruningcited by 38
- 2023Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learningcited by 26
- 2022Meta-Query-Net: Resolving Purity-Informativeness Dilemma in Open-set Active Learningcited by 24
- 2022Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correctioncited by 22
- 2025Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertaintycited by 22
- 2024Benchmarking Object Detectors with COCO: A New Path Forwardcited by 21
- 2023Robust Data Pruning under Label Noise via Maximizing Re-labeling Accuracycited by 20
- 2024Diversified Batch Selection for Training Accelerationcited by 14
- 2025Data Pruning by Information Maximizationcited by 14
- 2024Flaws of ImageNet, Computer Vision's Favourite Datasetcited by 12
- 2025Instance-dependent Early Stoppingcited by 10
- 2024ELFS: Label-Free Coreset Selection with Proxy Training Dynamicscited by 9
- 2025Scale Efficient Training for Large Datasetscited by 7
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.