mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Drainage: A Unifying Framework for Addressing Class Uncertainty

arXiv 2512.03182 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern deep learning faces significant challenges with noisy labels, class ambiguity, as well as the need to robustly reject out-of-distribution or corrupted samples. In this work, we propose a unified framework based on the concept of a "drainage node'' which we add at the output of the network. The node serves to reallocate probability mass toward uncertainty, while preserving desirable properties such as end-to-end training and differentiability. This mechanism provides a natural escape route for highly ambiguous, anomalous, or noisy samples, particularly relevant for instance-dependent and asymmetric label noise. In systematic experiments involving the addition of varying proportions of instance-dependent noise or asymmetric noise to CIFAR-10/100 labels, our drainage formulation achieves an accuracy increase of up to 9% over existing approaches in the high-noise regime. Our results on real-world datasets, such as mini-WebVision, mini-ImageNet and Clothing-1M, match or surpass existing state-of-the-art methods. Qualitative analysis reveals a denoising effect, where the drainage neuron consistently absorbs corrupt, mislabeled, or outlier data, leading to more stable decision boundaries. Furthermore, our drainage formulation enables applications well beyond classification, with immediate benefits for web-scale, semi-supervised dataset cleaning, and open-set applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  6. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  7. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  8. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  9. 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 353
  10. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  11. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  12. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
4 more
  1. 2017Generative OpenMax for Multi-Class Open Set Classificationcited by 157
  2. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  3. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  4. 2024Dissecting Out-of-Distribution Detection and Open-Set Recognition: A Critical Analysis of Methods and Benchmarkscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.