mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Real-World Medical Image Classification with Noisy Labels: Challenges, Practice, and Outlook

arXiv 2512.09315 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from noisy labels remains a major challenge in medical image analysis, where annotation demands expert knowledge and substantial inter-observer variability often leads to inconsistent or erroneous labels. Despite extensive research on learning with noisy labels (LNL), the robustness of existing methods in medical imaging has not been systematically assessed. To address this gap, we introduce LNMBench, a comprehensive benchmark for Label Noise in Medical imaging. LNMBench encompasses 10 representative methods evaluated across 7 datasets, 6 imaging modalities, and 3 noise patterns, establishing a unified and reproducible framework for robustness evaluation under realistic conditions. Comprehensive experiments reveal that the performance of existing LNL methods degrades substantially under high and real-world noise, highlighting the persistent challenges of class imbalance and domain variability in medical data. Motivated by these findings, we further propose a simple yet effective improvement to enhance model robustness under such conditions. The LNMBench codebase is publicly released to facilitate standardized evaluation, promote reproducible research, and provide practical insights for developing noise-resilient algorithms in both research and real-world medical applications.The codebase is publicly available on https://github.com/myyy777/LNMBench.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.

Builds on

41 of 58 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
  4. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  5. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  6. 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
  7. 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  9. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
  10. 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 590
  11. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  12. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
29 more
  1. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  2. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  3. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  4. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learningcited by 209
  5. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  6. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  7. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  8. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  9. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  10. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  11. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  12. 2020Interpreting Chest X-rays via CNNs that Exploit Hierarchical Disease Dependencies and Uncertainty Labelscited by 56
  13. 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
  14. 2019Robust Learning at Noisy Labeled Medical Images: Applied to Skin Lesion Classificationcited by 33
  15. 2020A Survey on Deep Learning with Noisy Labels: How to train your model when you cannot trust on the annotations?cited by 25
  16. 2019Quantifying and Leveraging Classification Uncertainty for Chest Radiograph Assessmentcited by 23
  17. 2021Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right: Combating Confirmation Bias in Learning with Label Noisecited by 18
  18. 2023Benchmarking common uncertainty estimation methods with histopathological images under domain shift and label noisecited by 15
  19. 2025OpenMIBOOD: Open Medical Imaging Benchmarks for Out-Of-Distribution Detectioncited by 13
  20. 2021Hierarchical Knowledge Guided Learning for Real-world Retinal Diseases Recognitioncited by 10
  21. 2022Cross-Field Transformer for Diabetic Retinopathy Grading on Two-field Fundus Imagescited by 9
  22. 2022Instance-dependent Label Distribution Estimation for Learning with Label Noisecited by 9
  23. 2023Dynamics-Aware Loss for Learning with Label Noisecited by 8
  24. 2023Improving Medical Image Classification in Noisy Labels Using Only Self-supervised Pretrainingcited by 8
  25. 2023Source-free Video Domain Adaptation by Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 6
  26. 2024QMix: Quality-aware Learning with Mixed Noise for Robust Retinal Disease Diagnosiscited by 5
  27. 2022A Gift from Label Smoothing: Robust Training with Adaptive Label Smoothing via Auxiliary Classifier under Label Noisecited by 4
  28. 2024ANNE: Adaptive Nearest Neighbors and Eigenvector-based Sample Selection for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 3
  29. 2024Unleashing the Potential of Open-set Noisy Samples Against Label Noise for Medical Image Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.