CroSel: Cross Selection of Confident Pseudo Labels for Partial-Label Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Partial-label learning (PLL) is an important weakly supervised learning problem, which allows each training example to have a candidate label set instead of a single ground-truth label. Identification-based methods have been widely explored to tackle label ambiguity issues in PLL, which regard the true label as a latent variable to be identified. However, identifying the true labels accurately and completely remains challenging, causing noise in pseudo labels during model training. In this paper, we propose a new method called CroSel, which leverages historical predictions from the model to identify true labels for most training examples. First, we introduce a cross selection strategy, which enables two deep models to select true labels of partially labeled data for each other. Besides, we propose a novel consistency regularization term called co-mix to avoid sample waste and tiny noise caused by false selection. In this way, CroSel can pick out the true labels of most examples with high precision. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of CroSel, which consistently outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets. Additionally, our method achieves over 90% accuracy and quantity for selecting true labels on CIFAR-type datasets under various settings.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2023.
Builds on
27 of 48 references.
References · 27
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2020Pre-Trained Image Processing Transformercited by 891
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
15 more
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
- 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
- 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
- 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
- 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalizationcited by 33
- 2022SoLar: Sinkhorn Label Refinery for Imbalanced Partial-Label Learningcited by 30
- 2017Learning from Ambiguously Labeled Face Imagescited by 29
- 2021Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels via Regularization between Representationscited by 26
- 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
- 2023Long-Tailed Partial Label Learning via Dynamic Rebalancingcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2025Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithmscited by 11
- 2024Partial-Label Learning with a Reject Optioncited by 3
- 2025Partial-Label Learning with Conformal Candidate Cleaningcited by 2
- 2025Tuning the Right Foundation Models is What you Need for Partial Label Learningcited by 2
- 2025Robust Partial-Label Learning by Leveraging Class Activation Valuescited by 1
- 2024PLOOD: Partial Label Learning with Out-of-distribution Objectscited by 0
- 2025Towards Robust Incremental Learning under Ambiguous Supervisioncited by 0
- 2025Diffusion Disambiguation Models for Partial Label Learningcited by 0
- 2025Amortized Variational Inference for Partial-Label Learning: A Probabilistic Approach to Label Disambiguationcited by 0
- 2026Mitigating Instance Entanglement in Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 0
- 2026Holistic Optimal Label Selection for Robust Prompt Learning under Partial Labelscited by 0
- 2026Holistic Optimal Label Selection for Robust Prompt Learning under Partial Labels8 Apr 2026
- 2026Mitigating Instance Entanglement in Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learning5 Mar 2026
- 2025Amortized Variational Inference for Partial-Label Learning: A Probabilistic Approach to Label Disambiguation24 Oct 2025
- 2025Diffusion Disambiguation Models for Partial Label Learning1 Jul 2025
- 2025Tuning the Right Foundation Models is What you Need for Partial Label Learning5 Jun 2025
- 2025Robust Partial-Label Learning by Leveraging Class Activation Values17 Feb 2025
- 2025Realistic Evaluation of Deep Partial-Label Learning Algorithms14 Feb 2025
- 2025Partial-Label Learning with Conformal Candidate Cleaning11 Feb 2025
- 2025Towards Robust Incremental Learning under Ambiguous Supervision23 Jan 2025
- 2024PLOOD: Partial Label Learning with Out-of-distribution Objects11 Mar 2024
- 2024Partial-Label Learning with a Reject Option1 Feb 2024