ACD-U: Asymmetric co-teaching with machine unlearning for robust learning with noisy labels
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are prone to memorizing incorrect labels during training, which degrades their generalizability. Although recent methods have combined sample selection with semi-supervised learning (SSL) to exploit the memorization effect -- where networks learn from clean data before noisy data -- they cannot correct selection errors once a sample is misclassified. To overcome this, we propose asymmetric co-teaching with different architectures (ACD)-U, an asymmetric co-teaching framework that uses different model architectures and incorporates machine unlearning. ACD-U addresses this limitation through two core mechanisms. First, its asymmetric co-teaching pairs a contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP)-pretrained vision Transformer with a convolutional neural network (CNN), leveraging their complementary learning behaviors: the pretrained model provides stable predictions, whereas the CNN adapts throughout training. This asymmetry, where the vision Transformer is trained only on clean samples and the CNN is trained through SSL, effectively mitigates confirmation bias. Second, selective unlearning enables post-hoc error correction by identifying incorrectly memorized samples through loss trajectory analysis and CLIP consistency checks, and then removing their influence via Kullback--Leibler divergence-based forgetting. This approach shifts the learning paradigm from passive error avoidance to active error correction. Experiments on synthetic and real-world noisy datasets, including CIFAR-10/100, CIFAR-N, WebVision, Clothing1M, and Red Mini-ImageNet, demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, particularly in high-noise regimes and under instance-dependent noise. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/meruemon/ACD-U.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 43 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2026.
Builds on
43 of 70 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustness13 Mar
- 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
- 2022Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teacher17 May
- 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning22 Oct
- 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar
Other references · 38
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
26 more
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2020Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Modelscited by 250
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
- 2019How does Early Stopping Help Generalization against Label Noise?cited by 41
- 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
- 2021Faster Meta Update Strategy for Noise-Robust Deep Learningcited by 38
- 2023Twin Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 28
- 2024CLIPCleaner: Cleaning Noisy Labels with CLIPcited by 16
- 2024Vision-Language Models are Strong Noisy Label Detectorscited by 16
- 2021SSR: An Efficient and Robust Framework for Learning with Unknown Label Noisecited by 13
- 2023Fine tuning Pre trained Models for Robustness Under Noisy Labelscited by 8
- 2024PLReMix: Combating Noisy Labels with Pseudo-Label Relaxed Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.