mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Data Pruning under Label Noise via Maximizing Re-labeling Accuracy

arXiv 2311.01002 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data pruning, which aims to downsize a large training set into a small informative subset, is crucial for reducing the enormous computational costs of modern deep learning. Though large-scale data collections invariably contain annotation noise and numerous robust learning methods have been developed, data pruning for the noise-robust learning scenario has received little attention. With state-of-the-art Re-labeling methods that self-correct erroneous labels while training, it is challenging to identify which subset induces the most accurate re-labeling of erroneous labels in the entire training set. In this paper, we formalize the problem of data pruning with re-labeling. We first show that the likelihood of a training example being correctly re-labeled is proportional to the prediction confidence of its neighborhood in the subset. Therefore, we propose a novel data pruning algorithm, Prune4Rel, that finds a subset maximizing the total neighborhood confidence of all training examples, thereby maximizing the re-labeling accuracy and generalization performance. Extensive experiments on four real and one synthetic noisy datasets show that algname outperforms the baselines with Re-labeling models by up to 9.1% as well as those with a standard model by up to 21.6%.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2023.

Builds on

40 of 58 references.

References · 40

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  7. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  8. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  9. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  10. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  11. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  12. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
28 more
  1. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  2. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  3. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  4. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  5. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
  6. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  7. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  8. 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 337
  9. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  10. 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
  11. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  12. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  13. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  14. 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
  15. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  16. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  17. 2020Theoretical Analysis of Self-Training with Deep Networks on Unlabeled Datacited by 179
  18. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  19. 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 146
  20. 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
  21. 2022Coverage-centric Coreset Selection for High Pruning Ratescited by 115
  22. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  23. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  24. 2020Multi-Task Curriculum Framework for Open-Set Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 82
  25. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  26. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  27. 2022Meta-Query-Net: Resolving Purity-Informativeness Dilemma in Open-set Active Learningcited by 24
  28. 2021Consistency Regularization Can Improve Robustness to Label Noisecited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 8; 2025: 4; 2026: 6.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 83
  2. 2023Spanning Training Progress: Temporal Dual-Depth Scoring (TDDS) for Enhanced Dataset Pruningcited by 38
  3. 2024CLIPCleaner: Cleaning Noisy Labels with CLIPcited by 16
  4. 2023Refined Coreset Selection: Towards Minimal Coreset Size under Model Performance Constraintscited by 13
  5. 2024Zero-Shot Coreset Selection via Iterative Subspace Samplingcited by 9
  6. 2024GDeR: Safeguarding Efficiency, Balancing, and Robustness via Prototypical Graph Pruningcited by 8
  7. 2024Evolution-aware VAriance (EVA) Coreset Selection for Medical Image Classificationcited by 7
  8. 2024Data Pruning via Separability, Integrity, and Model Uncertainty-Aware Importance Samplingcited by 2
  9. 2024Geometric Median (GM) Matching for Robust Data Pruningcited by 1
  10. 2025Geometric Median Matching for Robust k-Subset Selection from Noisy Datacited by 1
  11. 2026Labeled TrustSet Guided: Batch Active Learning with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  12. 2026The Label Imitation Game: Turing Test Network for Zero-Shot Pseudo-Label Pruningcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2024Bayesian uncertainty-aware deep learning with noisy labels: Tackling annotation ambiguity in EEG seizure detectioncited by 0
  2. 2025References Indeed Matter? Reference-Free Preference Optimization for Conversational Query Reformulationcited by 0
  3. 2025LARP: Learner-Agnostic Robust Data Prefilteringcited by 0
  4. 2025Explore and Establish Synergistic Effects Between Weight Pruning and Coreset Selection in Neural Network Trainingcited by 0
  5. 2026DREAM: Dual-Standard Semantic Homogeneity with Dynamic Optimization for Graph Learning with Label Noisecited by 0
  6. 2026Minimax Generalized Cross-Entropycited by 0
  7. 2026Beyond Loss Values: Robust Dynamic Pruning via Loss Trajectory Alignmentcited by 0
  8. 2026Unmasking Removal-Budget Confounding: A Matched Operating-Point Evaluation Framework for Adaptive Data Cleaningcited by 0