Mitigating the Impact of False Negatives in Dense Retrieval with Contrastive Confidence Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In open-domain Question Answering (QA), dense retrieval is crucial for finding relevant passages for answer generation. Typically, contrastive learning is used to train a retrieval model that maps passages and queries to the same semantic space. The objective is to make similar ones closer and dissimilar ones further apart. However, training such a system is challenging due to the false negative issue, where relevant passages may be missed during data annotation. Hard negative sampling, which is commonly used to improve contrastive learning, can introduce more noise in training. This is because hard negatives are those closer to a given query, and thus more likely to be false negatives. To address this issue, we propose a novel contrastive confidence regularizer for Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) loss, a commonly used loss for dense retrieval. Our analysis shows that the regularizer helps dense retrieval models be more robust against false negatives with a theoretical guarantee. Additionally, we propose a model-agnostic method to filter out noisy negative passages in the dataset, improving any downstream dense retrieval models. Through experiments on three datasets, we demonstrate that our method achieves better retrieval performance in comparison to existing state-of-the-art dense retrieval systems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2023.
Builds on
33 of 47 references.
References · 33
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 619
- 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 410
21 more
- 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 398
- 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 354
- 2020Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrievalcited by 213
- 2021Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 203
- 2021RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingcited by 175
- 2019Poly-encoders: Transformer Architectures and Pre-training Strategies for Fast and Accurate Multi-sentence Scoringcited by 164
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
- 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
- 2021Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for dense text retrievalcited by 82
- 2021End-to-End Training of Neural Retrievers for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 75
- 2021Domain-matched Pre-training Tasks for Dense Retrievalcited by 53
- 2020IIRC: A Dataset of Incomplete Information Reading Comprehension Questionscited by 52
- 2021PAIR: Leveraging Passage-Centric Similarity Relation for Improving Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 50
- 2022Multi-View Document Representation Learning for Open-Domain Dense Retrievalcited by 41
- 2022ERNIE-Search: Bridging Cross-Encoder with Dual-Encoder via Self On-the-fly Distillation for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 41
- 2022PROD: Progressive Distillation for Dense Retrievalcited by 20
- 2022ConTextual Masked Auto-Encoder for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 16
- 2021Mitigating False-Negative Contexts in Multi-document Question Answering with Retrieval Marginalizationcited by 10
- 2023Coarse-to-Fine Knowledge Selection for Document Grounded Dialogscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Cooperative Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question Answering: Mutual Information Exchange and Ranking by Contrasting Layerscited by 2
- 2025MInCo: Mitigating Information Conflicts in Distracted Visual Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2025Optimizing What Matters: AUC-Driven Learning for Robust Neural Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026ECIsem: Semantic Residual Effective Contrastive Information for Evaluating Hard Negativescited by 0
- 2026ECIsem: Semantic Residual Effective Contrastive Information for Evaluating Hard Negatives22 Mar 2026
- 2025Cooperative Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question Answering: Mutual Information Exchange and Ranking by Contrasting Layers11 Dec 2025
- 2025Optimizing What Matters: AUC-Driven Learning for Robust Neural Retrieval30 Sep 2025
- 2025MInCo: Mitigating Information Conflicts in Distracted Visual Model-based Reinforcement Learning5 Apr 2025