Binary Classification with Instance and Label Dependent Label Noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning with label dependent label noise has been extensively explored in both theory and practice; however, dealing with instance (i.e., feature) and label dependent label noise continues to be a challenging task. The difficulty arises from the fact that the noise rate varies for each instance, making it challenging to estimate accurately. The question of whether it is possible to learn a reliable model using only noisy samples remains unresolved. We answer this question with a theoretical analysis that provides matching upper and lower bounds. Surprisingly, our results show that, without any additional assumptions, empirical risk minimization achieves the optimal excess risk bound. Specifically, we derive a novel excess risk bound proportional to the noise level, which holds in very general settings, by comparing the empirical risk minimizers obtained from clean samples and noisy samples. Second, we show that the minimax lower bound for the 0-1 loss is a constant proportional to the average noise rate. Our findings suggest that learning solely with noisy samples is impossible without access to clean samples or strong assumptions on the distribution of the data.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2023.
Builds on
23 of 46 references.
References · 23
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
11 more
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
- 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
- 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
- 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
- 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
- 2014Making Risk Minimization Tolerant to Label Noisecited by 54
- 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
- 2017Exponential convergence of testing error for stochastic gradient methodscited by 13
- 2019Classification with unknown class-conditional label noise on non-compact feature spacescited by 9
- 2021Binary classification with corrupted labelscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.
- 2024Label Noise: Ignorance Is Blisscited by 9
- 2024Retraining with Predicted Hard Labels Provably Increases Model Accuracycited by 5
- 2024Label Noise: Ignorance Is Bliss31 Oct 2024
- 2024Retraining with Predicted Hard Labels Provably Increases Model Accuracy17 Jun 2024