mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cost-Sensitive Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts with Workload Constraints

arXiv 2403.06906 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning to defer (L2D) aims to improve human-AI collaboration systems by learning how to defer decisions to humans when they are more likely to be correct than an ML classifier. Existing research in L2D overlooks key real-world aspects that impede its practical adoption, namely: i) neglecting cost-sensitive scenarios, where type I and type II errors have different costs; ii) requiring concurrent human predictions for every instance of the training dataset; and iii) not dealing with human work-capacity constraints. To address these issues, we propose the textitdeferral under cost and capacity constraints framework (DeCCaF). DeCCaF is a novel L2D approach, employing supervised learning to model the probability of human error under less restrictive data requirements (only one expert prediction per instance) and using constraint programming to globally minimize the error cost, subject to workload limitations. We test DeCCaF in a series of cost-sensitive fraud detection scenarios with different teams of 9 synthetic fraud analysts, with individual work-capacity constraints. The results demonstrate that our approach performs significantly better than the baselines in a wide array of scenarios, achieving an average 8.4% reduction in the misclassification cost. The code used for the experiments is available at https://github.com/feedzai/deccaf

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

Builds on

26 of 55 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  3. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  4. 2022Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routingcited by 611
  5. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  6. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
  7. 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 262
  8. 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
  9. 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
  10. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  11. 2020A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scorescited by 74
  12. 2021Towards Unbiased and Accurate Deferral to Multiple Expertscited by 71
14 more
  1. 2022Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifierscited by 68
  2. 2023Who Should Predict? Exact Algorithms For Learning to Defer to Humanscited by 68
  3. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  4. 2018Direct Uncertainty Prediction for Medical Second Opinionscited by 61
  5. 2022Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts: Consistent Surrogate Losses, Confidence Calibration, and Conformal Ensemblescited by 59
  6. 2021Hybrid Intelligencecited by 55
  7. 2022Sample Efficient Learning of Predictors that Complement Humanscited by 46
  8. 2022Forming Effective Human-AI Teams: Building Machine Learning Models that Complement the Capabilities of Multiple Expertscited by 40
  9. 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 39
  10. 2022Advancing Human-AI Complementarity: The Impact of User Expertise and Algorithmic Tuning on Joint Decision Makingcited by 33
  11. 2021Assessing the Impact of Automated Suggestions on Decision Making: Domain Experts Mediate Model Errors but Take Less Initiativecited by 28
  12. 2023Learning to Defer with Limited Expert Predictionscited by 25
  13. 2021Human-AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision-Making: "Automation Bias" and "Selective Adherence" to Algorithmic Advicecited by 22
  14. 2022Human-AI Collaboration in Decision-Making: Beyond Learning to Defercited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 7.

12 papers.