mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regroup Median Loss for Combating Label Noise

arXiv 2312.06273 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The deep model training procedure requires large-scale datasets of annotated data. Due to the difficulty of annotating a large number of samples, label noise caused by incorrect annotations is inevitable, resulting in low model performance and poor model generalization. To combat label noise, current methods usually select clean samples based on the small-loss criterion and use these samples for training. Due to some noisy samples similar to clean ones, these small-loss criterion-based methods are still affected by label noise. To address this issue, in this work, we propose Regroup Median Loss (RML) to reduce the probability of selecting noisy samples and correct losses of noisy samples. RML randomly selects samples with the same label as the training samples based on a new loss processing method. Then, we combine the stable mean loss and the robust median loss through a proposed regrouping strategy to obtain robust loss estimation for noisy samples. To further improve the model performance against label noise, we propose a new sample selection strategy and build a semi-supervised method based on RML. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, for both the traditionally trained and semi-supervised models, RML achieves a significant improvement on synthetic and complex real-world datasets. The source code of the paper has been released.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2023.

Builds on

36 of 48 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  2. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  3. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  4. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  6. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  7. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  8. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  9. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  10. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  11. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  12. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
24 more
  1. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  2. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  3. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  4. 2018Context Encoding for Semantic Segmentationcited by 289
  5. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  6. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  7. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  8. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  9. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  10. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  11. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  12. 2015Accelerating Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Classification and Detectioncited by 109
  13. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  14. 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
  15. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  16. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  17. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  18. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  19. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  20. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  21. 2018Deep Bilevel Learningcited by 48
  22. 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
  23. 2020When OT meets MoM: Robust estimation of Wasserstein Distancecited by 23
  24. 2022Improving Generalization of Deep Neural Network Acoustic Models with Length Perturbation and N-best Based Label Smoothingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

8 papers.