mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2502.01968 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 39

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies show that in supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of large language models (LLMs), data quality matters more than quantity. While most data cleaning methods concentrate on filtering entire samples, the quality of individual tokens within a sample can vary significantly. After pre-training, even in high-quality samples, patterns or phrases that are not task-related can be redundant, uninformative, or even harmful. Continuing to fine-tune on these patterns may offer limited benefit and even degrade downstream task performance. In this paper, we investigate token quality from a noisy-label perspective and propose a generic token cleaning pipeline for SFT tasks. Our method filters out uninformative tokens while preserving those carrying key task-specific information. Specifically, we first evaluate token quality by examining the influence of model updates on each token, then apply a threshold-based separation. The token influence can be measured in a single pass with a fixed reference model or iteratively with self-evolving reference models. The benefits and limitations of both methods are analyzed theoretically by error upper bounds. Extensive experiments show that our framework consistently improves downstream performance. Code is available at https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/TokenCleaning.

Key facts. Cited by 39 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2025.

Builds on

42 of 55 references.

References · 42

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  8. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  9. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  10. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  11. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  12. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
30 more
  1. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  2. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
  3. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  4. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
  5. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  6. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
  7. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  8. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  9. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  10. 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 201
  11. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  12. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  13. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 133
  14. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  15. 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 108
  16. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  17. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
  18. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
  19. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  20. 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 57
  21. 2017Learning with Confident Examples: Rank Pruning for Robust Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 52
  22. 2023Dataset Quantizationcited by 47
  23. 2024Automated Data Curation for Robust Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 27
  24. 2023Unmasking and Improving Data Credibility: A Study with Datasets for Training Harmless Language Modelscited by 26
  25. 2024Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating Systemscited by 26
  26. 2024Mixed Preference Optimization: Reinforcement Learning with Data Selection and Better Reference Modelcited by 25
  27. 2022Detecting Label Errors by using Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 16
  28. 2021Can Less be More? When Increasing-to-Balancing Label Noise Rates Considered Beneficialcited by 13
  29. 2023Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any modelcited by 12
  30. 2024Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approachcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 19; 2026: 20.

39 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025GUARD: Generation-time LLM Unlearning via Adaptive Restriction and Detectioncited by 17
  2. 2025SelecTKD: Selective Token-Weighted Knowledge Distillation for LLMscited by 17
  3. 2026ProFit: Leveraging High-Value Signals in SFT via Probability-Guided Token Selectioncited by 16
  4. 2025T-SHIRT: Token-Selective Hierarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 12
  5. 2025Beyond Scaling Law: A Data-Efficient Distillation Framework for Reasoningcited by 11
  6. 2025Winning the Pruning Gamble: A Unified Approach to Joint Sample and Token Pruning for Efficient Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 8
  7. 2025IF-GUIDE: Influence Function-Guided Detoxification of LLMscited by 7
  8. 2025AgenticMath: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Agentic-based Math Data Generationcited by 7
  9. 2025Better Reasoning with Less Data: Enhancing VLMs Through Unified Modality Scoringcited by 6
  10. 2025MobileLLM-R1: Exploring the Limits of Sub-Billion Language Model Reasoners with Open Training Recipescited by 6
  11. 2025Improving the OOD Performance of Closed-Source LLMs on NLI Through Strategic Data Selectioncited by 4
  12. 2025Towards Understanding Valuable Preference Data for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 4
27 more
  1. 2025Rethinking Supervised Fine-Tuning: Emphasizing Key Answer Tokens for Improved LLM Accuracycited by 4
  2. 2025ssToken: Self-modulated and Semantic-aware Token Selection for LLM Fine-tuningcited by 3
  3. 2025LM-mixup: Text Data Augmentation via Language Model based Mixupcited by 3
  4. 2025Label Smoothing Improves Gradient Ascent in LLM Unlearningcited by 3
  5. 2026Gradients Must Earn Their Influence: Unifying SFT with Generalized Entropic Objectivescited by 3
  6. 2026Token-level Data Selection for Safe LLM Fine-tuningcited by 3
  7. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Modelscited by 3
  8. 2025Evaluating LLM-Contaminated Crowdsourcing Data Without Ground Truthcited by 2
  9. 2025Rethinking Hate Speech Detection on Social Media: Can LLMs Replace Traditional Models?cited by 2
  10. 2026Small-Margin Preferences Still Matter-If You Train Them Rightcited by 2
  11. 2026TailSFT: Filtered Fine-Tuning Improves Post-Training Performancecited by 2
  12. 2026LLMdoctor: Token-Level Flow-Guided Preference Optimization for Efficient Test-Time Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 1
  13. 2026Explainable Token-level Noise Filtering for LLM Fine-tuning Datasetscited by 1
  14. 2026Forget What Matters, Keep the Rest: Selective Unlearning of Informative Tokenscited by 1
  15. 2026AlphaToken: Decoupling Adaptation and Stability for Path-Aware Response Token Valuation in LLM Post-Trainingcited by 1
  16. 2026CODEBLOCK: Learning to Supervise Code at the Right Granularitycited by 1
  17. 2025Incentivizing High-quality Participation From Federated Learning Agentscited by 0
  18. 2025Agile Deliberation: Concept Deliberation for Subjective Visual Classificationcited by 0
  19. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning Needs to Unlock the Potential of Token Prioritycited by 0
  20. 2026One Algorithm, Two Goals: Dual Scoring for Parameter and Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
  21. 2026Let the Target Select for Itself: Data Selection via Target-Aligned Pathscited by 0
  22. 2026Learning Multi-Indicator Weights for Data Selection: A Joint Task-Model Adaptation Framework with Efficient Proxiescited by 0
  23. 2026Unifying Data, Memory, and Compute Efficiency in LLM training: A Surveycited by 0
  24. 2026Token Utility Is Selection-Conditioned: Coupled Selection of Prompt Context and Response Supervision for Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 0
  25. 2026Decoupling Token Roles in Autoregressive Pretrainingcited by 0
  26. 2026Rethinking Token Reweighting for SFT: Suppress, Reverse, and Extrapolate Learned Featurescited by 0
  27. 2026Training LLM Judges from Language Feedback via Position-Selective Self-Distillationcited by 0