mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels by Anchor Hallucination and Hard Sample Label Correction

arXiv 2407.07331 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from noisy-labeled data is crucial for real-world applications. Traditional Noisy-Label Learning (NLL) methods categorize training data into clean and noisy sets based on the loss distribution of training samples. However, they often neglect that clean samples, especially those with intricate visual patterns, may also yield substantial losses. This oversight is particularly significant in datasets with Instance-Dependent Noise (IDN), where mislabeling probabilities correlate with visual appearance. Our approach explicitly distinguishes between clean vs.noisy and easy vs. hard samples. We identify training samples with small losses, assuming they have simple patterns and correct labels. Utilizing these easy samples, we hallucinate multiple anchors to select hard samples for label correction. Corrected hard samples, along with the easy samples, are used as labeled data in subsequent semi-supervised training. Experiments on synthetic and real-world IDN datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method over other state-of-the-art NLL methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.

Builds on

23 of 27 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  2. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  3. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  6. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  7. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  8. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  9. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  10. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  11. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  12. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
11 more
  1. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  2. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  3. 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
  4. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  5. 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
  6. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  7. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  8. 2021Hallucination Improves Few-Shot Object Detectioncited by 50
  9. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  10. 2020ProSelfLC: Progressive Self Label Correction for Training Robust Deep Neural Networkscited by 33
  11. 2022Centrality and Consistency: Two-Stage Clean Samples Identification for Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labelscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.