mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ANNE: Adaptive Nearest Neighbors and Eigenvector-based Sample Selection for Robust Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2411.01613 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An important stage of most state-of-the-art (SOTA) noisy-label learning methods consists of a sample selection procedure that classifies samples from the noisy-label training set into noisy-label or clean-label subsets. The process of sample selection typically consists of one of the two approaches: loss-based sampling, where high-loss samples are considered to have noisy labels, or feature-based sampling, where samples from the same class tend to cluster together in the feature space and noisy-label samples are identified as anomalies within those clusters. Empirically, loss-based sampling is robust to a wide range of noise rates, while feature-based sampling tends to work effectively in particular scenarios, e.g., the filtering of noisy instances via their eigenvectors (FINE) sampling exhibits greater robustness in scenarios with low noise rates, and the K nearest neighbor (KNN) sampling mitigates better high noise-rate problems. This paper introduces the Adaptive Nearest Neighbors and Eigenvector-based (ANNE) sample selection methodology, a novel approach that integrates loss-based sampling with the feature-based sampling methods FINE and Adaptive KNN to optimize performance across a wide range of noise rate scenarios. ANNE achieves this integration by first partitioning the training set into high-loss and low-loss sub-groups using loss-based sampling. Subsequently, within the low-loss subset, sample selection is performed using FINE, while the high-loss subset employs Adaptive KNN for effective sample selection. We integrate ANNE into the noisy-label learning state of the art (SOTA) method SSR+, and test it on CIFAR-10/-100 (with symmetric, asymmetric and instance-dependent noise), Webvision and ANIMAL-10, where our method shows better accuracy than the SOTA in most experiments, with a competitive training time.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2024.

Builds on

41 of 59 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  2. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  3. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  4. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  5. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  7. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  8. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  9. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  10. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  11. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  12. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
29 more
  1. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  2. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  3. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  4. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  5. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 113
  6. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  7. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  8. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  9. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  10. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  11. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  12. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  13. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  14. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  15. 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 68
  16. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  17. 2021NGC: A Unified Framework for Learning with Open-World Noisy Datacited by 58
  18. 2021Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning under a Structural Causal Modelcited by 50
  19. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  20. 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
  21. 2021Boosting Co-teaching with Compression Regularization for Label Noisecited by 31
  22. 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
  23. 2022Uncertainty-Aware Learning Against Label Noise on Imbalanced Datasetscited by 28
  24. 2021PropMix: Hard Sample Filtering and Proportional MixUp for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 17
  25. 2022Instance-Dependent Noisy Label Learning via Graphical Modellingcited by 17
  26. 2022Centrality and Consistency: Two-Stage Clean Samples Identification for Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labelscited by 16
  27. 2021SSR: An Efficient and Robust Framework for Learning with Unknown Label Noisecited by 13
  28. 2022Blind Knowledge Distillation for Robust Image Classificationcited by 9
  29. 2022Bootstrapping the Relationship Between Images and Their Clean and Noisy Labelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.