mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

STRAPPER: Preference-based Reinforcement Learning via Self-training Augmentation and Peer Regularization

arXiv 2307.09692 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) promises to learn a complex reward function with binary human preference. However, such human-in-the-loop formulation requires considerable human effort to assign preference labels to segment pairs, hindering its large-scale applications. Recent approache has tried to reuse unlabeled segments, which implicitly elucidates the distribution of segments and thereby alleviates the human effort. And consistency regularization is further considered to improve the performance of semi-supervised learning. However, we notice that, unlike general classification tasks, in PbRL there exits a unique phenomenon that we defined as similarity trap in this paper. Intuitively, human can have diametrically opposite preferredness for similar segment pairs, but such similarity may trap consistency regularization fail in PbRL. Due to the existence of similarity trap, such consistency regularization improperly enhances the consistency possiblity of the model's predictions between segment pairs, and thus reduces the confidence in reward learning, since the augmented distribution does not match with the original one in PbRL. To overcome such issue, we present a self-training method along with our proposed peer regularization, which penalizes the reward model memorizing uninformative labels and acquires confident predictions. Empirically, we demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning well a variety of locomotion and robotic manipulation behaviors using different semi-supervised alternatives and peer regularization.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.

Builds on

29 of 48 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  2. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  3. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  4. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  5. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  6. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  7. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  8. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  9. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
  10. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  11. 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 438
  12. 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Ataricited by 314
17 more
  1. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingcited by 298
  2. 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 246
  3. 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
  4. 2020Theoretical Analysis of Self-Training with Deep Networks on Unlabeled Datacited by 179
  5. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  6. 2017Deep TAMER: Interactive Agent Shaping in High-Dimensional State Spacescited by 122
  7. 2021B-Pref: Benchmarking Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  8. 2022SURF: Semi-supervised Reward Learning with Data Augmentation for Feedback-efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  9. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  10. 2018Batch Active Preference-Based Learning of Reward Functionscited by 87
  11. 2020Active Preference-Based Gaussian Process Regression for Reward Learningcited by 70
  12. 2022Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  13. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 56
  14. 2019Preferences Implicit in the State of the Worldcited by 33
  15. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28
  16. 2020Avoiding Side Effects in Complex Environmentscited by 24
  17. 2021Offline Preference-Based Apprenticeship Learningcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Similarity as Reward Alignment: Robust and Versatile Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2024Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning via Aligned Experience Estimation
  4. 2023Data Driven Reward Initialization for Preference based Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2023Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward Modeling
  6. 2024Online Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Self-augmented Feedback from Large Language Model
  7. 2023Provable Reward-Agnostic Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2024Sample-Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Dynamics Aware Rewards