mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trustable Co-label Learning from Multiple Noisy Annotators

arXiv 2203.04199 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised deep learning depends on massive accurately annotated examples, which is usually impractical in many real-world scenarios. A typical alternative is learning from multiple noisy annotators. Numerous earlier works assume that all labels are noisy, while it is usually the case that a few trusted samples with clean labels are available. This raises the following important question: how can we effectively use a small amount of trusted data to facilitate robust classifier learning from multiple annotators? This paper proposes a data-efficient approach, called Trustable Co-label Learning (TCL), to learn deep classifiers from multiple noisy annotators when a small set of trusted data is available. This approach follows the coupled-view learning manner, which jointly learns the data classifier and the label aggregator. It effectively uses trusted data as a guide to generate trustable soft labels (termed co-labels). A co-label learning can then be performed by alternately reannotating the pseudo labels and refining the classifiers. In addition, we further improve TCL for a special complete data case, where each instance is labeled by all annotators and the label aggregator is represented by multilayer neural networks to enhance model capacity. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets clearly demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach. Source code is available at https://github.com/ShikunLi/TCL

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

Builds on

24 of 98 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  6. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  7. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  8. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  9. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  10. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  11. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  12. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
12 more
  1. 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
  2. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  3. 2017Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classificationcited by 77
  4. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  5. 2017Learning the Structure of Generative Models without Labeled Datacited by 50
  6. 2017Learning From Noisy Singly-labeled Datacited by 50
  7. 2019Learning Dependency Structures for Weak Supervision Modelscited by 32
  8. 2020Learning from Crowds by Modeling Common Confusionscited by 32
  9. 2019Max-MIG: an Information Theoretic Approach for Joint Learning from Crowdscited by 26
  10. 2016Exploiting Web Images for Dataset Construction: A Domain Robust Approachcited by 22
  11. 2014Error Rate Bounds and Iterative Weighted Majority Voting for Crowdsourcingcited by 20
  12. 2018Learning Supervised Topic Models for Classification and Regression from Crowdscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

12 papers.