GraphCleaner: Detecting Mislabelled Samples in Popular Graph Learning Benchmarks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Label errors have been found to be prevalent in popular text, vision, and audio datasets, which heavily influence the safe development and evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Despite increasing efforts towards improving the quality of generic data types, such as images and texts, the problem of mislabel detection in graph data remains underexplored. To bridge the gap, we explore mislabelling issues in popular real-world graph datasets and propose GraphCleaner, a post-hoc method to detect and correct these mislabelled nodes in graph datasets. GraphCleaner combines the novel ideas of 1) Synthetic Mislabel Dataset Generation, which seeks to generate realistic mislabels; and 2) Neighborhood-Aware Mislabel Detection, where neighborhood dependency is exploited in both labels and base classifier predictions. Empirical evaluations on 6 datasets and 6 experimental settings demonstrate that GraphCleaner outperforms the closest baseline, with an average improvement of 0.14 in F1 score, and 0.16 in MCC. On real-data case studies, GraphCleaner detects real and previously unknown mislabels in popular graph benchmarks: PubMed, Cora, CiteSeer and OGB-arxiv; we find that at least 6.91% of PubMed data is mislabelled or ambiguous, and simply removing these mislabelled data can boost evaluation performance from 86.71% to 89.11%.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2023.
Builds on
27 of 36 references.
References · 27
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 976
- 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 506
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
15 more
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2020Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models Out-performs Graph Neural Networkscited by 202
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
- 2020Unifying Graph Convolutional Neural Networks and Label Propagationcited by 98
- 2021Be Confident! Towards Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks via Confidence Calibrationcited by 92
- 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
- 2021NRGNN: Learning a Label Noise-Resistant Graph Neural Network on Sparsely and Noisily Labeled Graphscited by 73
- 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
- 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 58
- 2019Non-Parametric Calibration for Classificationcited by 57
- 2019Learning Graph Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 30
- 2021Understanding Square Loss in Training Overparametrized Neural Network Classifierscited by 14
- 2020Residual Correlation in Graph Neural Network Regressioncited by 11
- 2022Birds of a Feather Trust Together: Knowing When to Trust a Classifier via Adaptive Neighborhood Aggregationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Position: Graph Foundation Models are Already Herecited by 86
- 2023Label-free Node Classification on Graphs with Large Language Models (LLMS)cited by 72
- 2024A Survey of Graph Neural Networks in Real world: Imbalance, Noise, Privacy and OOD Challengescited by 54
- 2025Position: Graph Learning Will Lose Relevance Due To Poor Benchmarkscited by 53
- 2024GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Datacited by 20
- 2024NoisyGL: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph Neural Networks under Label Noisecited by 17
- 2026A Fair Evaluation of Graph Foundation Models for Node Property Predictioncited by 4
- 2026A Fair Evaluation of Graph Foundation Models for Node Property Prediction23 Jun 2026
- 2025Position: Graph Learning Will Lose Relevance Due To Poor Benchmarks20 Feb 2025
- 2024GraphLand: Evaluating Graph Machine Learning Models on Diverse Industrial Data22 Sep 2024
- 2024NoisyGL: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph Neural Networks under Label Noise6 Jun 2024
- 2024A Survey of Graph Neural Networks in Real world: Imbalance, Noise, Privacy and OOD Challenges7 Mar 2024
- 2024Position: Graph Foundation Models are Already Here3 Feb 2024
- 2023Label-free Node Classification on Graphs with Large Language Models (LLMS)7 Oct 2023