mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sample Prior Guided Robust Model Learning to Suppress Noisy Labels

arXiv 2112.01197 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Imperfect labels are ubiquitous in real-world datasets and seriously harm the model performance. Several recent effective methods for handling noisy labels have two key steps: 1) dividing samples into cleanly labeled and wrongly labeled sets by training loss, 2) using semi-supervised methods to generate pseudo-labels for samples in the wrongly labeled set. However, current methods always hurt the informative hard samples due to the similar loss distribution between the hard samples and the noisy ones. In this paper, we proposed PGDF (Prior Guided Denoising Framework), a novel framework to learn a deep model to suppress noise by generating the samples' prior knowledge, which is integrated into both dividing samples step and semi-supervised step. Our framework can save more informative hard clean samples into the cleanly labeled set. Besides, our framework also promotes the quality of pseudo-labels during the semi-supervised step by suppressing the noise in the current pseudo-labels generating scheme. To further enhance the hard samples, we reweight the samples in the cleanly labeled set during training. We evaluated our method using synthetic datasets based on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, as well as on the real-world datasets WebVision and Clothing1M. The results demonstrate substantial improvements over state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2021.

Builds on

42 of 54 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  5. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  6. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  7. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  8. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  9. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  10. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  11. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  12. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
30 more
  1. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  2. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  3. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  4. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  5. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  6. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  7. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  8. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  9. 2017Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processingcited by 262
  10. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  11. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  12. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  13. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  14. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  15. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  16. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  17. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  18. 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
  19. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  20. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  21. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  22. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  23. 2021NGC: A Unified Framework for Learning with Open-World Noisy Datacited by 58
  24. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  25. 2019How does Early Stopping Help Generalization against Label Noise?cited by 41
  26. 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
  27. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
  28. 2019L_DMI: An Information-theoretic Noise-robust Loss Functioncited by 26
  29. 2020Noisy Concurrent Training for Efficient Learning under Label Noisecited by 13
  30. 2018Limited Gradient Descent: Learning With Noisy Labelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

8 papers.