Understanding and Mitigating the Bias in Sample Selection for Learning with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning with noisy labels aims to ensure model generalization given a label-corrupted training set. The sample selection strategy achieves promising performance by selecting a label-reliable subset for model training. In this paper, we empirically reveal that existing sample selection methods suffer from both data and training bias that are represented as imbalanced selected sets and accumulation errors in practice, respectively. However, only the training bias was handled in previous studies. To address this limitation, we propose a noIse-Tolerant Expert Model (ITEM) for debiased learning in sample selection. Specifically, to mitigate the training bias, we design a robust network architecture that integrates with multiple experts. Compared with the prevailing double-branch network, our network exhibits better performance of selection and prediction by ensembling these experts while training with fewer parameters. Meanwhile, to mitigate the data bias, we propose a mixed sampling strategy based on two weight-based data samplers. By training on the mixture of two class-discriminative mini-batches, the model mitigates the effect of the imbalanced training set while avoiding sparse representations that are easily caused by sampling strategies. Extensive experiments and analyses demonstrate the effectiveness of ITEM. Our code is available at this url hrefhttps://github.com/1998v7/ITEMITEM.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2024.
Builds on
36 of 57 references.
References · 36
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2019BBN: Bilateral-Branch Network with Cumulative Learning for Long-Tailed Visual Recognitioncited by 403
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
24 more
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
- 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
- 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
- 2021Robust Long-Tailed Learning under Label Noisecited by 35
- 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalizationcited by 33
- 2017Learning Deep Networks from Noisy Labels with Dropout Regularizationcited by 32
- 2022When Noisy Labels Meet Long Tail Dilemmas: A Representation Calibration Methodcited by 21
- 2023Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examplescited by 17
- 2021Delving into Sample Loss Curve to Embrace Noisy and Imbalanced Datacited by 16
- 2023Fine-Grained Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 15
- 2024Dirichlet-Based Prediction Calibration for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.