mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimation

arXiv 2206.02791 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 49

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In label-noise learning, estimating the transition matrix has attracted more and more attention as the matrix plays an important role in building statistically consistent classifiers. However, it is very challenging to estimate the transition matrix T(x), where x denotes the instance, because it is unidentifiable under the instance-dependent noise(IDN). To address this problem, we have noticed that, there are psychological and physiological evidences showing that we humans are more likely to annotate instances of similar appearances to the same classes, and thus poor-quality or ambiguous instances of similar appearances are easier to be mislabeled to the correlated or same noisy classes. Therefore, we propose assumption on the geometry of T(x) that "the closer two instances are, the more similar their corresponding transition matrices should be". More specifically, we formulate above assumption into the manifold embedding, to effectively reduce the degree of freedom of T(x) and make it stably estimable in practice. The proposed manifold-regularized technique works by directly reducing the estimation error without hurting the approximation error about the estimation problem of T(x). Experimental evaluations on four synthetic and two real-world datasets demonstrate that our method is superior to state-of-the-art approaches for label-noise learning under the challenging IDN.

Key facts. Cited by 49 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2022.

Builds on

34 of 57 references.

References · 34

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  6. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  7. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  8. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  9. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  10. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  11. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  12. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
22 more
  1. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  2. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  3. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  4. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  5. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  6. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  7. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  8. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  9. 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
  10. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  11. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  12. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  13. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  14. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  15. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  16. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  17. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 67
  18. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  19. 2017Learning with Confident Examples: Rank Pruning for Robust Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 52
  20. 2016Loss factorization, weakly supervised learning and label noise robustnesscited by 24
  21. 2021Noise-resistant Deep Metric Learning with Ranking-based Instance Selectioncited by 23
  22. 2020Meta Transition Adaptation for Robust Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 15; 2024: 17; 2025: 4; 2026: 8.

49 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Label-Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models for Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 20
  2. 2022Instance-Dependent Noisy Label Learning via Graphical Modellingcited by 17
  3. 2023FedDiv: Collaborative Noise Filtering for Federated Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 13
  4. 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustnesscited by 10
  5. 2022Instance-dependent Label Distribution Estimation for Learning with Label Noisecited by 9
  6. 2023Federated Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labelcited by 9
  7. 2024Diversified and Personalized Multi-rater Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
  8. 2024Foster Adaptivity and Balance in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 9
  9. 2024Trusted Multi-view Learning under Noisy Supervisioncited by 8
  10. 2024Generalizable Person Re-identification via Balancing Alignment and Uniformitycited by 8
  11. 2023Quantifying and mitigating the impact of label errors on model disparity metricscited by 7
  12. 2024Estimating Noisy Class Posterior with Part-level Labels for Noisy Label Learningcited by 7
37 more
  1. 2022A Survey of Computer Vision Technologies In Urban and Controlled-environment Agriculturecited by 6
  2. 2023Combating Label Noise With A General Surrogate Model For Sample Selectioncited by 6
  3. 2024Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selectioncited by 6
  4. 2022ProSelfLC: Progressive Self Label Correction Towards A Low-Temperature Entropy Statecited by 5
  5. 2024QMix: Quality-aware Learning with Mixed Noise for Robust Retinal Disease Diagnosiscited by 5
  6. 2023Instance-dependent Noisy-label Learning with Graphical Model Based Noise-rate Estimationcited by 4
  7. 2023PNT-Edge: Towards Robust Edge Detection with Noisy Labels by Learning Pixel-level Noise Transitionscited by 4
  8. 2024Learning with Noisy Labels: Interconnection of Two Expectation-Maximizationscited by 4
  9. 2024Camera-aware Label Refinement for Unsupervised Person Re-identificationcited by 4
  10. 2024Extracting Clean and Balanced Subset for Noisy Long-tailed Classificationcited by 3
  11. 2024D2SP: Dynamic Dual-Stage Purification Framework for Dual Noise Mitigation in Vision-based Affective Recognitioncited by 3
  12. 2024ANNE: Adaptive Nearest Neighbors and Eigenvector-based Sample Selection for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 3
  13. 2025Enhanced Sample Selection with Confidence Tracking: Identifying Correctly Labeled yet Hard-to-Learn Samples in Noisy Datacited by 3
  14. 2026Optimal Transport for LLM Reward Modeling from Noisy Preferencecited by 3
  15. 2023LNL+K: Enhancing Learning with Noisy Labels Through Noise Source Knowledge Integrationcited by 2
  16. 2025GeoT: Geometry-guided Instance-dependent Transition Matrix for Semi-supervised Tooth Point Cloud Segmentationcited by 2
  17. 2025Noise-Aware Generalization: Robustness to In-Domain Noise and Out-of-Domain Generalizationcited by 2
  18. 2022Neighbour Consistency Guided Pseudo-Label Refinement for Unsupervised Person Re-Identificationcited by 1
  19. 2023Asymmetric Co-teaching with Multi-view Consensus for Noisy Label Learningcited by 1
  20. 2023Towards the Identifiability in Noisy Label Learning: A Multinomial Mixture Modelling Approachcited by 1
  21. 2023PASS: Peer-Agreement based Sample Selection for training with Noisy Labelscited by 1
  22. 2023Bridging Generative and Discriminative Noisy-Label Learning via Direction-Agnostic EM Formulationcited by 1
  23. 2024Unleashing the Potential of Open-set Noisy Samples Against Label Noise for Medical Image Classificationcited by 1
  24. 2024NoisyAG-News: A Benchmark for Addressing Instance-Dependent Noise in Text Classificationcited by 1
  25. 2024Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labels by Anchor Hallucination and Hard Sample Label Correctioncited by 1
  26. 2026AURA: Adaptive Uncertainty-aware Refinement for LLM-as-a-Judge Auditingcited by 1
  27. 2023Rethinking the Value of Labels for Instance-Dependent Label Noise Learningcited by 0
  28. 2023A Unified Framework for Connecting Noise Modeling to Boost Noise Detectioncited by 0
  29. 2023Hypothesis Testing for Class-Conditional Noise Using Local Maximum Likelihoodcited by 0
  30. 2024Learning from Noisy Labels for Long-tailed Data via Optimal Transportcited by 0
  31. 2025Learning to Clean: Reinforcement Learning for Noisy Label Correctioncited by 0
  32. 2026FedCova: Robust Federated Covariance Learning Against Noisy Labelscited by 0
  33. 2026Optimizing What We Trust: Reliability-Guided QUBO Selection of Multi-Agent Weak Framing Signals for Arabic Sentiment Predictioncited by 0
  34. 2026MIND: Decoupling Model-Induced Label Noise via Latent Manifold Disentanglementcited by 0
  35. 2026Learning Robust Recommenders from Noisy Implicit Feedback via GMM-Weighted Bayesian Transition Matrixcited by 0
  36. 2026Where LLM Annotators Fail: Label-Free Learning on Graphs with LLMscited by 0
  37. 2026Analyzing Training-Free Corruption Detection for Object Detection Datasetscited by 0