mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tackling Noisy Labels with Network Parameter Additive Decomposition

arXiv 2403.13241 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2024cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given data with noisy labels, over-parameterized deep networks suffer overfitting mislabeled data, resulting in poor generalization. The memorization effect of deep networks shows that although the networks have the ability to memorize all noisy data, they would first memorize clean training data, and then gradually memorize mislabeled training data. A simple and effective method that exploits the memorization effect to combat noisy labels is early stopping. However, early stopping cannot distinguish the memorization of clean data and mislabeled data, resulting in the network still inevitably overfitting mislabeled data in the early training stage.In this paper, to decouple the memorization of clean data and mislabeled data, and further reduce the side effect of mislabeled data, we perform additive decomposition on network parameters. Namely, all parameters are additively decomposed into two groups, i.e., parameters w are decomposed as w=bmσ+bmγ. Afterward, the parameters bmσ are considered to memorize clean data, while the parameters bmγ are considered to memorize mislabeled data. Benefiting from the memorization effect, the updates of the parameters bmσ are encouraged to fully memorize clean data in early training, and then discouraged with the increase of training epochs to reduce interference of mislabeled data. The updates of the parameters bmγ are the opposite. In testing, only the parameters bmσ are employed to enhance generalization. Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world benchmarks confirm the superior performance of our method.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2024.

Builds on

44 of 74 references.

References · 44

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  4. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  5. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  6. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  7. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  9. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  10. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  11. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  12. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
32 more
  1. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  2. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  3. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  4. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  5. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  6. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  7. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  8. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  9. 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 158
  10. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  11. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  12. 2018CurriculumNet: Weakly Supervised Learning from Large-Scale Web Imagescited by 126
  13. 2019Scalable and Order-robust Continual Learning with Additive Parameter Decompositioncited by 125
  14. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  15. 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  16. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  17. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  18. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  19. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
  20. 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
  21. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  22. 2019How does Early Stopping Help Generalization against Label Noise?cited by 41
  23. 2022Large-Scale Pre-training for Person Re-identification with Noisy Labelscited by 41
  24. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  25. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
  26. 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
  27. 2020Class2Simi: A Noise Reduction Perspective on Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 25
  28. 2020Coresets for Robust Training of Neural Networks against Noisy Labelscited by 24
  29. 2020Meta Transition Adaptation for Robust Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 17
  30. 2021Adaptive Hierarchical Similarity Metric Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 8
  31. 2021MetaLabelNet: Learning to Generate Soft-Labels from Noisy-Labelscited by 5
  32. 2023Improve Noise Tolerance of Robust Loss via Noise-Awarenesscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

8 papers.