mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards the Identifiability in Noisy Label Learning: A Multinomial Mixture Modelling Approach

arXiv 2301.01405 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from noisy labels (LNL) is crucial in deep learning, in which one of the approaches is to identify clean-label samples from poorly-annotated datasets. Such an identification is challenging because the conventional LNL problem, which assumes only one noisy label per instance, is non-identifiable, i.e., clean labels cannot be estimated theoretically without additional heuristics. This paper presents a novel data-driven approach that addresses this issue without requiring any heuristics about clean samples. We discover that the LNL problem becomes identifiable if there are at least 2C - 1 i.i.d. noisy labels per instance, where C is the number of classes. Our finding relies on the assumption of i.i.d. noisy labels and multinomial mixture modelling, making it easier to interpret than previous studies that require full-rank noisy-label transition matrices. To fulfil this condition without additional manual annotations, we propose a method that automatically generates additional i.i.d. noisy labels through nearest neighbours. These noisy labels are then used in the Expectation-Maximisation algorithm to infer clean labels. Our method demonstrably estimates clean labels accurately across various label noise benchmarks, including synthetic, web-controlled, and real-world datasets. Furthermore, the model trained with our method performs competitively with many state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2023.

Builds on

41 of 73 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  8. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  9. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  10. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  11. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  12. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
29 more
  1. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  2. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  3. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  4. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  5. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  6. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  7. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  8. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  9. 2021Efficient and Modular Implicit Differentiationcited by 199
  10. 2017OSQP: An Operator Splitting Solver for Quadratic Programscited by 156
  11. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  12. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  13. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  14. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  15. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  16. 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
  17. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  18. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  19. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  20. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  21. 2021Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning under a Structural Causal Modelcited by 50
  22. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  23. 2021Faster Meta Update Strategy for Noise-Robust Deep Learningcited by 38
  24. 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
  25. 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
  26. 2021Boosting Co-teaching with Compression Regularization for Label Noisecited by 31
  27. 2014Identifiability of the Simplex Volume Minimization Criterion for Blind Hyperspectral Unmixing: The No Pure-Pixel Casecited by 26
  28. 2022TPU-KNN: K Nearest Neighbor Search at Peak FLOP/scited by 18
  29. 2017Blind Multiclass Ensemble Classificationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.