Learning to Rectify for Robust Learning with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Label noise significantly degrades the generalization ability of deep models in applications. Effective strategies and approaches, textite.g. re-weighting, or loss correction, are designed to alleviate the negative impact of label noise when training a neural network. Those existing works usually rely on the pre-specified architecture and manually tuning the additional hyper-parameters. In this paper, we propose warped probabilistic inference (WarPI) to achieve adaptively rectifying the training procedure for the classification network within the meta-learning scenario. In contrast to the deterministic models, WarPI is formulated as a hierarchical probabilistic model by learning an amortization meta-network, which can resolve sample ambiguity and be therefore more robust to serious label noise. Unlike the existing approximated weighting function of directly generating weight values from losses, our meta-network is learned to estimate a rectifying vector from the input of the logits and labels, which has the capability of leveraging sufficient information lying in them. This provides an effective way to rectify the learning procedure for the classification network, demonstrating a significant improvement of the generalization ability. Besides, modeling the rectifying vector as a latent variable and learning the meta-network can be seamlessly integrated into the SGD optimization of the classification network. We evaluate WarPI on four benchmarks of robust learning with noisy labels and achieve the new state-of-the-art under variant noise types. Extensive study and analysis also demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2021.
Builds on
54 of 93 references.
References · 54
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2018Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimizationcited by 476
38 more
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2018Probabilistic Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 254
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2015Cost Sensitive Learning of Deep Feature Representations from Imbalanced Datacited by 167
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
- 2018Meta-Learning Probabilistic Inference For Predictioncited by 108
- 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
- 2016Deep Label Distribution Learning with Label Ambiguitycited by 104
- 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
- 2019Meta-Learning with Warped Gradient Descentcited by 98
- 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
- 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
- 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
- 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
- 2017Meta-Learning and Universality: Deep Representations and Gradient Descent can Approximate any Learning Algorithmcited by 65
- 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
- 2020Learning to Purify Noisy Labels via Meta Soft Label Correctorcited by 39
- 2020Improving Generalization by Controlling Label-Noise Information in Neural Network Weightscited by 35
- 2019MetaFun: Meta-Learning with Iterative Functional Updatescited by 34
- 2019L_DMI: An Information-theoretic Noise-robust Loss Functioncited by 26
- 2019Adaptive Posterior Learning: few-shot learning with a surprise-based memory modulecited by 25
- 2020NoiseRank: Unsupervised Label Noise Reduction with Dependence Modelscited by 20
- 2020Robustness of Accuracy Metric and its Inspirations in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 20
- 2020Learning to Learn Kernels with Variational Random Featurescited by 18
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalizationcited by 33
- 2022Jigsaw-ViT: Learning Jigsaw Puzzles in Vision Transformercited by 21
- 2023Fine-Grained Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 15
- 2023Dynamics-Aware Loss for Learning with Label Noisecited by 8
- 2024SURE: SUrvey REcipes for building reliable and robust deep networkscited by 8
- 2023MetaViewer: Towards A Unified Multi-View Representationcited by 5
- 2023Compensation Learning in Semantic Segmentationcited by 5
- 2022Maximising the Utility of Validation Sets for Imbalanced Noisy-label Meta-learningcited by 1
- 2024Robust Learning under Hybrid Noisecited by 1
- 2025RoNFA: Robust Neural Field-based Approach for Few-Shot Image Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 0
- 2025Learning to Retrieve with Weakened Labels: Robust Training under Label Noisecited by 0
- 2026Variational Rectification Inference for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 0
- 2026Variational Rectification Inference for Learning with Noisy Labels18 Mar 2026
- 2025Learning to Retrieve with Weakened Labels: Robust Training under Label Noise15 Dec 2025
- 2025RoNFA: Robust Neural Field-based Approach for Few-Shot Image Classification with Noisy Labels3 Jun 2025
- 2024Robust Learning under Hybrid Noise4 Jul 2024
- 2024SURE: SUrvey REcipes for building reliable and robust deep networks1 Mar 2024
- 2023Compensation Learning in Semantic Segmentation26 Apr 2023
- 2023Dynamics-Aware Loss for Learning with Label Noise21 Mar 2023
- 2023MetaViewer: Towards A Unified Multi-View Representation11 Mar 2023
- 2023Fine-Grained Classification with Noisy Labels4 Mar 2023
- 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalization24 Aug 2022
- 2022Maximising the Utility of Validation Sets for Imbalanced Noisy-label Meta-learning17 Aug 2022
- 2022Jigsaw-ViT: Learning Jigsaw Puzzles in Vision Transformer25 Jul 2022