An Empirical Study of Automated Mislabel Detection in Real World Vision Datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Major advancements in computer vision can primarily be attributed to the use of labeled datasets. However, acquiring labels for datasets often results in errors which can harm model performance. Recent works have proposed methods to automatically identify mislabeled images, but developing strategies to effectively implement them in real world datasets has been sparsely explored. Towards improved data-centric methods for cleaning real world vision datasets, we first conduct more than 200 experiments carefully benchmarking recently developed automated mislabel detection methods on multiple datasets under a variety of synthetic and real noise settings with varying noise levels. We compare these methods to a Simple and Efficient Mislabel Detector (SEMD) that we craft, and find that SEMD performs similarly to or outperforms prior mislabel detection approaches. We then apply SEMD to multiple real world computer vision datasets and test how dataset size, mislabel removal strategy, and mislabel removal amount further affect model performance after retraining on the cleaned data. With careful design of the approach, we find that mislabel removal leads per-class performance improvements of up to 8% of a retrained classifier in smaller data regimes.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2023.
Builds on
32 of 48 references.
References · 32
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
- 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
- 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
20 more
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2022SatMAE: Pre-training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagerycited by 402
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2022A Survey of Vision-Language Pre-Trained Modelscited by 177
- 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 164
- 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 158
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
- 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
- 2022When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetcited by 60
- 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
- 2022Characterizing Datapoints via Second-Split Forgettingcited by 37
- 2021Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels via Regularization between Representationscited by 26
- 2022METER-ML: A Multi-Sensor Earth Observation Benchmark for Automated Methane Source Mappingcited by 17
- 2022Identifying Incorrect Annotations in Multi-Label Classification Datacited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Measuring Stochastic Data Complexity with Boltzmann Influence Functionscited by 1
- 2024Noisy Ostracods: A Fine-Grained, Imbalanced Real-World Dataset for Benchmarking Robust Machine Learning and Label Correction Methodscited by 1
- 2026Adaptive Ensemble Selection for Noisy Labels on Tabular Datacited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Ensemble Selection for Noisy Labels on Tabular Data26 Sep 2026
- 2024Noisy Ostracods: A Fine-Grained, Imbalanced Real-World Dataset for Benchmarking Robust Machine Learning and Label Correction Methods3 Dec 2024
- 2024Measuring Stochastic Data Complexity with Boltzmann Influence Functions4 Jun 2024