mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise Comparisons

arXiv 2301.11270 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 244

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

We provide a theoretical framework for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Our analysis shows that when the true reward function is linear, the widely used maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) converges under both the Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model and the Plackett-Luce (PL) model. However, we show that when training a policy based on the learned reward model, MLE fails while a pessimistic MLE provides policies with improved performance under certain coverage assumptions. Additionally, we demonstrate that under the PL model, the true MLE and an alternative MLE that splits the K-wise comparison into pairwise comparisons both converge. Moreover, the true MLE is asymptotically more efficient. Our results validate the empirical success of existing RLHF algorithms in InstructGPT and provide new insights for algorithm design. Furthermore, our results unify the problem of RLHF and max-entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), and provide the first sample complexity bound for max-entropy IRL.

Key facts. Cited by 244 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 53 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2023.

Builds on

53 of 103 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Benchmarks and Algorithms for Offline Preference-Based Reward Learning3 Jan
  2. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
  3. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  4. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback17 Dec
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences18 Sep
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 47

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  4. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  5. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  6. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  7. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
  8. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
  9. 2021Implicit Behavioral Cloningcited by 442
  10. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 362
  11. 2022Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotescited by 290
  12. 2021Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedbackcited by 287
35 more
  1. 2021Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimismcited by 275
  2. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
  3. 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 256
  4. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 244
  5. 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 157
  6. 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 155
  7. 2017Deep TAMER: Interactive Agent Shaping in High-Dimensional State Spacescited by 122
  8. 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
  9. 2022Adversarially Trained Actor Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 111
  10. 2021Provable Benefits of Actor-Critic Methods for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 109
  11. 2021Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferencescited by 105
  12. 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 98
  13. 2022Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximationcited by 80
  14. 2015Simple, Robust and Optimal Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 68
  15. 2020Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guaranteescited by 65
  16. 2014Reducing Dueling Bandits to Cardinal Banditscited by 62
  17. 2015Estimation from Pairwise Comparisons: Sharp Minimax Bounds with Topology Dependencecited by 59
  18. 2019Dueling Posterior Sampling for Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
  19. 2015Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Dueling Bandit Problemcited by 51
  20. 2021Efficient and Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits under Realizabilitycited by 44
  21. 2015Spectral MLE: Top-K Rank Aggregation from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 34
  22. 2021On the Theory of Reinforcement Learning with Once-per-Episode Feedbackcited by 32
  23. 2013Learning Trajectory Preferences for Manipulators via Iterative Improvementcited by 31
  24. 2016A Relative Exponential Weighing Algorithm for Adversarial Utility-based Dueling Banditscited by 31
  25. 2018PAC Battling Bandits in the Plackett-Luce Modelcited by 27
  26. 2014Minimax-optimal Inference from Partial Rankingscited by 22
  27. 2018Approximate Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 21
  28. 2018Active Ranking with Subset-wise Preferencescited by 21
  29. 2016Learning Dynamic Robot-to-Human Object Handover from Human Feedbackcited by 19
  30. 2022Pessimism for Offline Linear Contextual Bandits using ℓp Confidence Setscited by 18
  31. 2022When is Realizability Sufficient for Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning?cited by 17
  32. 2017Minimax Rates and Efficient Algorithms for Noisy Sortingcited by 15
  33. 2022Provably Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory-Wise Rewardcited by 13
  34. 2017Learning from Comparisons and Choicescited by 12
  35. 2022Exploiting Correlation to Achieve Faster Learning Rates in Low-Rank Preference Banditscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 43; 2024: 83; 2025: 75; 2026: 43.

244 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  2. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
  3. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignmentcited by 283
  4. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
  5. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignmentcited by 228
  6. 2025MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agentscited by 226
  7. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPTcited by 221
  8. 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
  9. 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHFcited by 181
  10. 2023Text2Reward: Reward Shaping with Language Models for Reinforcement Learningcited by 153
  11. 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 136
  12. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 133
38 more
  1. 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFcited by 126
  2. 2023Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHFcited by 125
  3. 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 124
  4. 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
  5. 2024Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizercited by 109
  6. 2024Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHFcited by 106
  7. 2024Critique-out-Loud Reward Modelscited by 105
  8. 2024Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanismcited by 102
  9. 2023Is RLHF More Difficult than Standard RL?cited by 96
  10. 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMscited by 89
  11. 2025MAPoRL: Multi-Agent Post-Co-Training for Collaborative Large Language Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 80
  12. 2025Outcome-based Exploration for LLM Reasoningcited by 79
  13. 2024Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHFcited by 73
  14. 2024An Overview of Diffusion Models: Applications, Guided Generation, Statistical Rates and Optimizationcited by 72
  15. 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregationcited by 71
  16. 2023Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback: Learning Dynamic Choices via Pessimismcited by 69
  17. 2024Robust Preference Optimization through Reward Model Distillationcited by 67
  18. 2024REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewardscited by 66
  19. 2024Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspectivecited by 62
  20. 2024Active Preference Optimization for Sample Efficient RLHFcited by 61
  21. 2023Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignmentcited by 57
  22. 2024Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and Overoptimization in RLHFcited by 57
  23. 2023Provable Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
  24. 2024Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Modelcited by 52
  25. 2024Axioms for AI Alignment from Human Feedbackcited by 50
  26. 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignmentcited by 48
  27. 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignmentcited by 46
  28. 2025Syntactic and Semantic Control of Large Language Models via Sequential Monte Carlocited by 45
  29. 2023RLCD: Reinforcement Learning from Contrastive Distillation for Language Model Alignmentcited by 42
  30. 2024Dataset Reset Policy Optimization for RLHFcited by 41
  31. 2025Prompt Curriculum Learning for Efficient LLM Post-Trainingcited by 40
  32. 2024Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queriescited by 39
  33. 2023PARL: A Unified Framework for Policy Alignment in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 38
  34. 2024Overcoming Reward Overoptimization via Adversarial Policy Optimization with Lightweight Uncertainty Estimationcited by 33
  35. 2024Sharp Analysis for KL-Regularized Contextual Bandits and RLHFcited by 32
  36. 2024How Far Are We From AGI: Are LLMs All We Need?cited by 31
  37. 2023The Trickle-down Impact of Reward (In-)consistency on RLHFcited by 29
  38. 2023Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 28

50 most cited of 244 All 244 (JSON)

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
  2. 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL
  3. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
  4. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  5. 2024Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
  6. 2020Revisiting Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning: New Perspectives and Algorithms
  7. 2025Failure Modes of Maximum Entropy RLHF
  8. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF