mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploiting Correlation to Achieve Faster Learning Rates in Low-Rank Preference Bandits

arXiv 2202.11795 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the Correlated Preference Bandits problem with random utility-based choice models (RUMs), where the goal is to identify the best item from a given pool of n items through online subsetwise preference feedback. We investigate whether models with a simple correlation structure, e.g. low rank, can result in faster learning rates. While we show that the problem can be impossible to solve for the general `low rank' choice models, faster learning rates can be attained assuming more structured item correlations. In particular, we introduce a new class of Block-Rank based RUM model, where the best item is shown to be (ε,δ)-PAC learnable with only O(r ε-2 log(n/δ)) samples. This improves on the standard sample complexity bound of tildeO(nε-2 log(1/δ)) known for the usual learning algorithms which might not exploit the item-correlations (r ll n). We complement the above sample complexity with a matching lower bound (up to logarithmic factors), justifying the tightness of our analysis. Surprisingly, we also show a lower bound of Omega(nε-2log(1/δ)) when the learner is forced to play just duels instead of larger subsetwise queries. Further, we extend the results to a more general `noisy Block-Rank' model, which ensures robustness of our techniques. Overall, our results justify the advantage of playing subsetwise queries over pairwise preferences (k=2), we show the latter provably fails to exploit correlation.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.

Builds on

18 of 47 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  2. 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 148
  3. 2015Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Banditscited by 79
  4. 2017Preferential Bayesian Optimizationcited by 72
  5. 2014Reducing Dueling Bandits to Cardinal Banditscited by 62
  6. 2014Nonstochastic Multi-Armed Bandits with Graph-Structured Feedbackcited by 61
  7. 2017Multi-dueling Bandits with Dependent Armscited by 35
  8. 2019Multi-Armed Bandits with Correlated Armscited by 33
  9. 2016A Relative Exponential Weighing Algorithm for Adversarial Utility-based Dueling Banditscited by 31
  10. 2018PAC Battling Bandits in the Plackett-Luce Modelcited by 27
  11. 2018PAC Ranking from Pairwise and Listwise Queries: Lower Bounds and Upper Boundscited by 17
  12. 2015Online Learning with Gaussian Payoffs and Side Observationscited by 15
6 more
  1. 2017A Nearly Instance Optimal Algorithm for Top-k Ranking under the Multinomial Logit Modelcited by 12
  2. 2020Multi-Armed Bandits with Dependent Armscited by 12
  3. 2016Data-driven Rank Breaking for Efficient Rank Aggregationcited by 10
  4. 2016Best-of-K Banditscited by 7
  5. 2015Cheap Banditscited by 6
  6. 2020Best-item Learning in Random Utility Models with Subset Choicescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

11 papers.