Finding Stationary Points by Comparisons
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of finding stationary points of non-convex functions when access to the objective is provided only through a comparison oracle that, given two points, outputs which has the larger function value. For a twice differentiable fcolonmathbb Rn→mathbb R with Lipschitz gradient and Hessian, we develop an algorithm that visits an ε-stationary point using widetilde O(n2/ε1.5) queries. Our approach uses a subroutine that estimates the normalized Hessian to accuracy δ using widetilde O(n2log(1/δ)) queries. We further study this problem with a quantum comparison oracle model where queries can be made in superpositions, and develop the first quantum algorithm that finds an ε-stationary point, which takes widetilde O(n/ε1.5) queries.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
- 2023Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise Comparisonscited by 244
- 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points Icited by 125
- 2016Matrix Completion has No Spurious Local Minimumcited by 124
- 2021Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferencescited by 105
- 2023Is RLHF More Difficult than Standard RL?cited by 96
- 2022Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximationcited by 80
- 2013Regularized M-estimators with nonconvexity: Statistical and algorithmic theory for local optimacited by 66
- 2020Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guaranteescited by 65
- 2019Dueling Posterior Sampling for Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
17 more
- 2018How To Make the Gradients Small Stochastically: Even Faster Convex and Nonconvex SGDcited by 55
- 2019Gradientless Descent: High-Dimensional Zeroth-Order Optimizationcited by 42
- 2023Zeroth-Order Optimization Meets Human Feedback: Provable Learning via Ranking Oraclescited by 34
- 2019Stochastic Three Points Method for Unconstrained Smooth Minimizationcited by 24
- 2017On the Optimization Landscape of Tensor Decompositionscited by 21
- 2024FedRLHF: A Convergence-Guaranteed Federated Framework for Privacy-Preserving and Personalized RLHFcited by 11
- 2015Decomposing Overcomplete 3rd Order Tensors using Sum-of-Squares Algorithmscited by 10
- 2019A Stochastic Derivative Free Optimization Method with Momentumcited by 9
- 2021On Faster Convergence of Scaled Sign Gradient Descentcited by 6
- 2023First and zeroth-order implementations of the regularized Newton method with lazy approximated Hessianscited by 6
- 2022Dueling Convex Optimization with General Preferencescited by 5
- 2021Smooth Convex Optimization using Sub-Zeroth-Order Oraclescited by 3
- 2024Acceleration Exists! Optimization Problems When Oracle Can Only Compare Objective Function Valuescited by 3
- 2024On The Global Convergence Of Online RLHF With Neural Parametrizationcited by 3
- 2023Faster Convergence with Multiway Preferencescited by 2
- 2025Balancing Gradient and Hessian Queries in Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026Function-free Optimization via Comparison Oraclescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.