mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning from Multi-Source Imperfect Preferences

arXiv 2603.20453 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) replaces hard-to-specify rewards with pairwise trajectory preferences, yet regret-oriented theory often assumes that preference labels are generated consistently from a single ground-truth objective. In practical RLHF systems, however, feedback is typically multi-source (annotators, experts, reward models, heuristics) and can exhibit systematic, persistent mismatches due to subjectivity, expertise variation, and annotation/modeling artifacts. We study episodic RL from multi-source imperfect preferences through a cumulative imperfection budget: for each source, the total deviation of its preference probabilities from an ideal oracle is at most ω over K episodes. We propose a unified algorithm with regret tildeO(√K/M+ω), which exhibits a best-of-both-regimes behavior: it achieves M-dependent statistical gains when imperfection is small (where M is the number of sources), while remaining robust with unavoidable additive dependence on ω when imperfection is large. We complement this with a lower bound tildeOmega(max√K/M,ω), which captures the best possible improvement with respect to M and the unavoidable dependence on ω, and a counterexample showing that na"ively treating imperfect feedback as oracle-consistent can incur regret as large as tildeOmega(minω√K,K). Technically, our approach involves imperfection-adaptive weighted comparison learning, value-targeted transition estimation to control hidden feedback-induced distribution shift, and sub-importance sampling to keep the weighted objectives analyzable, yielding regret guarantees that quantify when multi-source feedback provably improves RLHF and how cumulative imperfection fundamentally limits it.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.

Builds on

36 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 17

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Robust Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for Large Language Models Fine-Tuning3 Apr
  2. 2025Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback1 Mar
  3. 2024Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs18 Sep
  4. 2024Robust Reinforcement Learning from Corrupted Human Feedback21 Jun
  5. 2024Optimizing Autonomous Driving for Safety: A Human-Centric Approach with LLM-Enhanced RLHF6 Jun
  6. 2024Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF31 May
  7. 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregation30 Apr
  8. 2024Exploration-Driven Policy Optimization in RLHF: Theoretical Insights on Efficient Data Utilization15 Feb
  9. 2024Corruption Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback9 Feb
  10. 2024A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback8 Jan
  11. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback22 Dec
  12. 2023Nash Learning from Human Feedback1 Dec
5 more
  1. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback1 Sep
  2. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback27 Jul
  3. 2023Is RLHF More Difficult than Standard RL?25 Jun
  4. 2023Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise Comparisons26 Jan
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 19

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,162
  4. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
  5. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
  6. 2023Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedbackcited by 422
  7. 2020Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted Regressioncited by 234
  8. 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 232
  9. 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 180
  10. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedbackcited by 135
  11. 2022Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximationcited by 81
  12. 2022Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Linear Contextual Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 51
7 more
  1. 2022Corruption-Robust Algorithms with Uncertainty Weighting for Nonlinear Contextual Bandits and Markov Decision Processescited by 33
  2. 2021On the Theory of Reinforcement Learning with Once-per-Episode Feedbackcited by 32
  3. 2013Learning Trajectory Preferences for Manipulators via Iterative Improvementcited by 31
  4. 2020Online learning in MDPs with linear function approximation and bandit feedbackcited by 30
  5. 2023A Near-Optimal Algorithm for Safe Reinforcement Learning Under Instantaneous Hard Constraintscited by 17
  6. 2022Investigations of Performance and Bias in Human-AI Teamwork in Hiringcited by 16
  7. 2024ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Modelscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Kernel-Based MDPs from Episodic Preferential Feedback
  2. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  3. 2026Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
  4. 2025Towards Efficient Online Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
  5. 2026A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language Models
  6. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint
  7. 2022Models of human preference for learning reward functions
  8. 2025Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?