mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection

arXiv 2402.11242 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning with noisy labels has gained increasing attention because the inevitable imperfect labels in real-world scenarios can substantially hurt the deep model performance. Recent studies tend to regard low-loss samples as clean ones and discard high-loss ones to alleviate the negative impact of noisy labels. However, real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. The imbalance issue is prone to causing failure in the loss-based sample selection since the under-learning of tail classes also leans to produce high losses. To this end, we propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets. Specifically, we propose Class-Balance-based sample Selection (CBS) to prevent the tail class samples from being neglected during training. We propose Confidence-based Sample Augmentation (CSA) for the chosen clean samples to enhance their reliability in the training process. To exploit selected noisy samples, we resort to prediction history to rectify labels of noisy samples. Moreover, we introduce the Average Confidence Margin (ACM) metric to measure the quality of corrected labels by leveraging the model's evolving training dynamics, thereby ensuring that low-quality corrected noisy samples are appropriately masked out. Lastly, consistency regularization is imposed on filtered label-corrected noisy samples to boost model performance. Comprehensive experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method, especially in imbalanced scenarios. Comprehensive experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method, especially in imbalanced scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2024.

Builds on

51 of 79 references.

References · 51

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  3. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  4. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  5. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  6. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  7. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  8. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  9. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  10. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  11. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
  12. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
38 more
  1. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  2. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  3. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  4. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  5. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  6. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  7. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  8. 2021ElasticFace: Elastic Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 143
  9. 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
  10. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  11. 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  12. 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
  13. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  14. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  15. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  16. 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
  17. 2021On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Modelscited by 54
  18. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  19. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
  20. 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
  21. 2021Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 34
  22. 2021Webly Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Benchmark Datasets and An Approachcited by 32
  23. 2022Uncertainty-Aware Learning Against Label Noise on Imbalanced Datasetscited by 28
  24. 2023Twin Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 28
  25. 2022SELC: Self-Ensemble Label Correction Improves Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 24
  26. 2022Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correctioncited by 22
  27. 2021Adaptive Sample Selection for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 20
  28. 2020Salvage Reusable Samples from Noisy Data for Robust Learningcited by 19
  29. 2022Saliency Guided Inter- and Intra-Class Relation Constraints for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 19
  30. 2021Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right: Combating Confirmation Bias in Learning with Label Noisecited by 18
  31. 2020Suppressing Mislabeled Data via Grouping and Self-Attentioncited by 17
  32. 2021Delving into Sample Loss Curve to Embrace Noisy and Imbalanced Datacited by 16
  33. 2023Multi-Granularity Denoising and Bidirectional Alignment for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 16
  34. 2019A Novel Self-Supervised Re-labeling Approach for Training with Noisy Labelscited by 10
  35. 2023MarginMatch: Improving Semi-Supervised Learning with Pseudo-Marginscited by 10
  36. 2021Self-paced Resistance Learning against Overfitting on Noisy Labelscited by 6
  37. 2020Hyper RPCA: Joint Maximum Correntropy Criterion and Laplacian Scale Mixture Modeling On-the-Fly for Moving Object Detectioncited by 5
  38. 2020Meta Segmentation Network for Ultra-Resolution Medical Imagescited by 3

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

6 papers.