Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning with noisy labels has gained increasing attention because the inevitable imperfect labels in real-world scenarios can substantially hurt the deep model performance. Recent studies tend to regard low-loss samples as clean ones and discard high-loss ones to alleviate the negative impact of noisy labels. However, real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. The imbalance issue is prone to causing failure in the loss-based sample selection since the under-learning of tail classes also leans to produce high losses. To this end, we propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets. Specifically, we propose Class-Balance-based sample Selection (CBS) to prevent the tail class samples from being neglected during training. We propose Confidence-based Sample Augmentation (CSA) for the chosen clean samples to enhance their reliability in the training process. To exploit selected noisy samples, we resort to prediction history to rectify labels of noisy samples. Moreover, we introduce the Average Confidence Margin (ACM) metric to measure the quality of corrected labels by leveraging the model's evolving training dynamics, thereby ensuring that low-quality corrected noisy samples are appropriately masked out. Lastly, consistency regularization is imposed on filtered label-corrected noisy samples to boost model performance. Comprehensive experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method, especially in imbalanced scenarios. Comprehensive experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method, especially in imbalanced scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2024.
Builds on
51 of 79 references.
References · 51
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
38 more
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2021ElasticFace: Elastic Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 143
- 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
- 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
- 2021Understanding and Improving Early Stopping for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2021Contrast to Divide: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 69
- 2021On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Modelscited by 54
- 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
- 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
- 2021Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 34
- 2021Webly Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Benchmark Datasets and An Approachcited by 32
- 2022Uncertainty-Aware Learning Against Label Noise on Imbalanced Datasetscited by 28
- 2023Twin Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 28
- 2022SELC: Self-Ensemble Label Correction Improves Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 24
- 2022Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correctioncited by 22
- 2021Adaptive Sample Selection for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 20
- 2020Salvage Reusable Samples from Noisy Data for Robust Learningcited by 19
- 2022Saliency Guided Inter- and Intra-Class Relation Constraints for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 19
- 2021Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right: Combating Confirmation Bias in Learning with Label Noisecited by 18
- 2020Suppressing Mislabeled Data via Grouping and Self-Attentioncited by 17
- 2021Delving into Sample Loss Curve to Embrace Noisy and Imbalanced Datacited by 16
- 2023Multi-Granularity Denoising and Bidirectional Alignment for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 16
- 2019A Novel Self-Supervised Re-labeling Approach for Training with Noisy Labelscited by 10
- 2023MarginMatch: Improving Semi-Supervised Learning with Pseudo-Marginscited by 10
- 2021Self-paced Resistance Learning against Overfitting on Noisy Labelscited by 6
- 2020Hyper RPCA: Joint Maximum Correntropy Criterion and Laplacian Scale Mixture Modeling On-the-Fly for Moving Object Detectioncited by 5
- 2020Meta Segmentation Network for Ultra-Resolution Medical Imagescited by 3
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Foster Adaptivity and Balance in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 9
- 2024Applications of Knowledge Distillation in Remote Sensing: A Surveycited by 8
- 2025Robust Dynamic Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 4
- 2024Inference-Time Rule Eraser: Fair Recognition via Distilling and Removing Biased Rulescited by 1
- 2024Robust Noisy Label Learning via Two-Stream Sample Distillationcited by 1
- 2025Label-Noise Resistant Learning via Optimal Brain Damage Maskingcited by 0
- 2025Label-Noise Resistant Learning via Optimal Brain Damage Masking13 Aug 2025
- 2025Robust Dynamic Facial Expression Recognition22 Feb 2025
- 2024Applications of Knowledge Distillation in Remote Sensing: A Survey18 Sep 2024
- 2024Foster Adaptivity and Balance in Learning with Noisy Labels3 Jul 2024
- 2024Robust Noisy Label Learning via Two-Stream Sample Distillation16 Apr 2024
- 2024Inference-Time Rule Eraser: Fair Recognition via Distilling and Removing Biased Rules7 Apr 2024