mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unleashing the Potential of Open-set Noisy Samples Against Label Noise for Medical Image Classification

arXiv 2406.12293 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Addressing mixed closed-set and open-set label noise in medical image classification remains a largely unexplored challenge. Unlike natural image classification, which often separates and processes closed-set and open-set noisy samples from clean ones, medical image classification contends with high inter-class similarity, complicating the identification of open-set noisy samples. Additionally, existing methods often fail to fully utilize open-set noisy samples for label noise mitigation, leading to their exclusion or the application of uniform soft labels. To address these challenges, we propose the Extended Noise-robust Contrastive and Open-set Feature Augmentation framework for medical image classification tasks. This framework incorporates the Extended Noise-robust Supervised Contrastive Loss, which helps differentiate features among both in-distribution and out-of-distribution classes. This loss treats open-set noisy samples as an extended class, improving label noise mitigation by weighting contrastive pairs according to label reliability. Additionally, we develop the Open-set Feature Augmentation module that enriches open-set samples at the feature level and then assigns them dynamic class labels, thereby leveraging the model's capacity and reducing overfitting to noisy data. We evaluated the proposed framework on both a synthetic noisy dataset and a real-world noisy dataset. The results indicate the superiority of our framework over four existing methods and the effectiveness of leveraging open-set noisy samples to combat label noise.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

38 of 58 references.

References · 38

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  7. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  8. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
  9. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  10. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  11. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  12. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
26 more
  1. 2022Quantifying Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: Are Conditional Entropy and Mutual Information Appropriate Measures?cited by 124
  2. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  3. 2021Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysiscited by 104
  4. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  5. 2020Annotation-efficient deep learning for automatic medical image segmentationcited by 79
  6. 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
  7. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
  8. 2022Instance-Dependent Label-Noise Learning with Manifold-Regularized Transition Matrix Estimationcited by 49
  9. 2021Hard Sample Aware Noise Robust Learning for Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 48
  10. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  11. 2019Robust Learning at Noisy Labeled Medical Images: Applied to Skin Lesion Classificationcited by 33
  12. 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
  13. 2022Robust Medical Image Classification from Noisy Labeled Data with Global and Local Representation Guided Co-trainingcited by 21
  14. 2020Salvage Reusable Samples from Noisy Data for Robust Learningcited by 19
  15. 2021Co-Correcting: Noise-tolerant Medical Image Classification via mutual Label Correctioncited by 16
  16. 2021Learning from Ambiguous Labels for Lung Nodule Malignancy Predictioncited by 15
  17. 2022Is your noise correction noisy? PLS: Robustness to label noise with two stage detectioncited by 11
  18. 2021NVUM: Non-Volatile Unbiased Memory for Robust Medical Image Classificationcited by 9
  19. 2022Instance-dependent Label Distribution Estimation for Learning with Label Noisecited by 9
  20. 2023Latent Class-Conditional Noise Modelcited by 9
  21. 2023Manifold DivideMix: A Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Severe Label Noisecited by 9
  22. 2024Tackling Noisy Labels with Network Parameter Additive Decompositioncited by 8
  23. 2022Less is More: Adaptive Curriculum Learning for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosiscited by 6
  24. 2023Improving Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation Across Clinical Sites: A Federated Learning Approach with Noise-Resilient Trainingcited by 4
  25. 2022Test Time Transform Prediction for Open Set Histopathological Image Recognitioncited by 3
  26. 2023URL: Combating Label Noise for Lung Nodule Malignancy Gradingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.